Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:45 pm**

Ruben Cassar wrote:
Kaplowitz wrote:
Ruben Cassar wrote:
t-o-m wrote:im not too keen on the sea

the filters you put on it look too textured than smooth, like the grain filter, and the one that puts the textured affect on th edges.
hmm...maybe something a little smoother would work, or maybe its just me that thinks this?

Aaaargh Tom! What are you telling me? I love that sea!

Me2, but id love it more if you made it more green.

But I look out of my window and I sea that blue sea not green. The Mediterranean is blue. I recognise the Mediterranean sea even in a movie. It's different from other seas. It's home. It's...well...it's the sea I learned to swim in! The sea where I caught a small squid (or was it a calamari?) and I just couldn't bear killing it so I released it again...ah happy memories. Hehe I'm in a strange mood today guys. Sorry! Seriously though...don't you think the Mediterranean is of a more blueish colour than a greenish one?

I have never seen the Mediterranean Sea

I have no clue
Your call

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:26 pm**

I really hate the red on the top and bottom borders...it really stands out, and I dislike it. Proably toning it down? I don't really know.

Also, I can't really read the purple territory beside Hippo Regius and Cartenna. I think you should change all the purple background territories should have white text.

I have not seen the Mediterranean sea either...so I have no problem with the sea colour

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:31 pm**

Well, blue is the right color to use, but I don't like the shade of blue you've picked. I also don't like the texture on the sea very much...

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:32 pm**

I can give you mine sea from IMperium romanum,if you need(these will be interesting,same sea like some part of Ancient roma map series)

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:35 pm**

Now i understand why you create these map,its these because melita :lol:

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:01 pm**

dittoeevee8888 wrote:I really hate the red on the top and bottom borders...it really stands out, and I dislike it. Proably toning it down? I don't really know.

Also, I can't really read the purple territory beside Hippo Regius and Cartenna. I think you should change all the purple background territories should have white text.

I have not seen the Mediterranean sea either...so I have no problem with the sea colour

The red is supposed to be Roman territory and the purple Carthaginian.

That territory is Iol. It's a strange name. Not lol but Iol.

Perhaps I will try to change all purple territories to white.

Edit: Ah just understood what you meant about the red parts. You meant the top and bottom segments. Hmm do other people dislike them? I could change the colour of course.

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:01 pm**

ZeakCytho wrote:Well, blue is the right color to use, but I don't like the shade of blue you've picked. I also don't like the texture on the sea very much...

Hmm. I might try some other shades in future revisions and make a poll?

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:02 pm**

Ruben Cassar wrote:
ZeakCytho wrote:Well, blue is the right color to use, but I don't like the shade of blue you've picked. I also don't like the texture on the sea very much...

Hmm. I might try some other shades in future revisions and make a poll?

Sure thing. I look forward to seeing this map develop.

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:05 pm**

qwert wrote:I can give you mine sea from IMperium romanum,if you need(these will be interesting,same sea like some part of Ancient roma map series)

No qwert that would be lame of me. Thanks for the offer though!

qwert wrote:Now i understand why you create these map,its these because melita

Ah qwert. You know me so well my friend! :p Melita was a very important strategic territory during the Punic Wars. The Maltese revolted against the Carthaginians to join Rome and Rome made them a civitas foederati as a sign of gratitude, in other words allies not conquered people. The Maltese even sent representatives to the Roman senate!

Anyway I have always wanted to make a map about the Punic Wars. It's got nothing to do with Melita.

Posted: **Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:16 pm**

No qwert that would be lame of me. Thanks for the offer though!

But you get mine permision to use these sea,no coppyright issue with that

well i spend 5 minutes to create some example(i have free 5 minutes).

you can reconsider these.its can be like-Rubben Qwert Ancient roman Map Series. :mrgreen:

Ah qwert. You know me so well my friend! :p Melita was a very important strategic territory during the Punic Wars. The Maltese revolted against the Carthaginians to join Rome and Rome made them a civitas foederati as a sign of gratitude, in other words allies not conquered people. The Maltese even sent representatives to the Roman senate!

Anyway I have always wanted to make a map about the Punic Wars. It's got nothing to do with Melita.

Sure,sure,melita its importan,because these,not because you from malta :lol:

Any way its interesting idea,but you need to give more ancient look of background and nonplayabile terittories.

Posted: **Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:34 am**

Version 1.10 - Added bonuses and map information section, toned down colour of red background

Posted: **Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:53 am**

As promised here is the poll on the sea colour.

SEA COLOUR POLL

Version 1.10 A

Version 1.10 B

Version 1.10 C

Posted: **Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:21 am**

I love C!

Posted: **Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:55 am**

C is the winner for me!

Posted: **Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:01 pm**

I hate C! It's too dull for me (I wouldn't call it Aquamarine but whatever). A and B are both fine for me though. (B preferred)

Too bad I'm the only one voting for B in the 4 people poll so far.

Posted: **Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:27 pm**

My vote goes to C.

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:20 pm**

Apart from the sea issue...does anyone have other comments to make about the map or gameplay perhaps?

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:26 pm**

could you find a medium between 10 B and 10 C?
that would be absolute perfect for me

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:35 pm**

t-o-m wrote:could you find a medium between 10 B and 10 C?
that would be absolute perfect for me

I said apart from the sea issue Tom! :p

Honestly I think I'm going to stick with C. It's grown on me and the majority prefer it.

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:15 pm**

C all the way for me!

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:46 pm**

Ruben Cassar wrote:
t-o-m wrote:could you find a medium between 10 B and 10 C?
that would be absolute perfect for me

I said apart from the sea issue Tom! :p

hehe sorry - i think that everyone likes C then, but i prefer a mixture

gl on whatever you pick

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:17 pm**

I voted for light blue (B).
I think it would work best with the colors (red and purple) on the land in the image.

I see that the water is really pixelated. Would you be able to smooth it out some? right now it is really harsh and doesn't really look like water.

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:26 pm**

Ruben Cassar wrote:Apart from the sea issue...does anyone have other comments to make about the map or gameplay perhaps?

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:29 pm**

Ruben Cassar wrote:
Ruben Cassar wrote:Apart from the sea issue...does anyone have other comments to make about the map or gameplay perhaps?

I think the sea could use some work.

:lol:

On a more serious note, I think the territory name font is a bit small right now, and you certainly have room to make it larger. I also don't like how some names are black and some are white - maybe pick a single color that's legible on all backgrounds instead?

Posted: **Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:32 pm**

A and B its almost same,well to me.
C is best of these three,but i think that can be more contrast,you know darken away from shore,and lighter close to shore.(beaches)

Conquer Club

[Abandoned] - Second Punic War

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Secundum Bellum Punicum (218-202 A.C.)

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2

Re: ROMA: Second Punic War - Vote in Sea Poll - map on pg. 1 & 2