Moderator: Cartographers
DJ Teflon wrote:Regarding the Saraha, I was meaning background/shading wise, not suggesting an extra territory or anything. Looking again, I think it may benefit from removing the border along the bottom of the map - then it would be consistent with the north-east of the map and just be clearer that it extends beyond the edge of the map?
Minor point but probaby related to other minor point above.
thenobodies80 wrote:this map is very good.
Only a little thing...Is possible a different graphic for routes?
Good work you are on the right way!
barterer2002 wrote:The anchors are better in this version but for instance, the Normandy anchor is unclear that it goes with Normandy. Perhaps if they connect the tert with the water it would be better.
rjz115dude wrote:WOW...first impression this is a really good map but i feel that their aren't enough territories or differences in bonuses. It looks really good, but there aren't any differneces between bonuses. If you could make another map with some more terretories this map would be perfect
miniwally wrote:what would you prefer we discuss graphics or gameplay?
Aline_Cedrac wrote:Wow! It's really perfect, I dare saying! And the arrows, I see now, they are merely aesthetic!
I would really feel like a crusadier if I played on this map...! Forward! You have my total support, as you already know!
aequitas08 wrote:hmm... maybe the picture didn't load right but i don't see shields on the small map, otherwise it looks good. i look forward to playing on this map someday.
Balsiefen wrote:Graphically, its a little hard to tell which territory the shields at paris and lorraine and the port at normandy are on.
MrBenn wrote:I was going to pick up on the Orleans/Lorraine shield...
Balsiefen wrote:Also the legend on the small map is a little hard to read.
MrBenn wrote:and the island of Malta will be completely covered by the army number...
Balsiefen wrote:I love this map, cant believe I've kept on missing it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users