Conquer Club

The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: The Texan Wars BUG!!

Postby bryguy on Sat May 31, 2008 1:32 pm

DogComplex wrote:The territories of Pampa and Lubbock are switched in map ID's. I can't believe this wasn't picked up earlier. Please fix.

Thanks,

DogComplex


it WAS picked up earlier, almost as soon as the map was made live. We've been trying to fix it for a long time now.
Corporal bryguy
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby Halmir on Sat May 31, 2008 4:30 pm

Hi, please check out my game 2501596 and my comments at 2008-05-31 21:26:04 (my local time anyway :) )

I tried to attack Pampa but ended up in Lubbock, has someone landed paratroopers to rearrange the signposts? :s I fear there's a few territory links that could do with a bit of updating. Cheers!
Lieutenant Halmir
 
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:12 pm
Location: UK

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby Night Strike on Sat May 31, 2008 4:34 pm

Seriously, does no one read the thread and notice that this issue has been mentioned a couple dozen times and that a fix is on the way???
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby t-o-m on Sat May 31, 2008 4:35 pm

this is about the 20th time this has been mentioned - at least you came to the right place:)
the bug will be fixed soon
User avatar
Major t-o-m
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:22 pm

New Texas Map has some bugs...

Postby Appalachian on Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:56 pm

Where do I post to call an extermintor???????????
Anarkistsdream wrote:Says the guy with the drunk Irishman as his avatar!

Go Notre Dame!

;) :lol:


flabio wrote:CHEERS!!!! to you and Erin.....
User avatar
Sergeant Appalachian
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:42 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: New Texas Map has some bugs...

Postby TaCktiX on Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:06 pm

Anything dealing with a specific map, you put in the map's topic (it's in Final Forge).
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class TaCktiX
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Rapid City, SD

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby rocky mountain on Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:16 pm

Pampa and Lubbock are switched. it cost me the game

p.s.- i know it's been mentioned.
Image
best: place 2349; points 1617; GP 216; GW 102(47%); Lieutenant
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class rocky mountain
 
Posts: 415
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:08 pm

Re: New Texas Map has some bugs...

Postby gimil on Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:35 pm

[merged]
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby Oggled on Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:00 am

I have found a bug in it.
Basically, in game 2513402 (if i remember correctly), i tried to attack pampa from childress, but ended up conquering lubbock, even though it is through an impassable object. I defended lubbock as my border, but when people attacked lubbock from the indian territory, they conquered pampa - basically, something is wrong with it!
Sergeant 1st Class Oggled
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:33 pm

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby lackattack on Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:54 am

edbeard wrote:I see a lot of people having this

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

at the top of their XML. This is not necessary to my knowledge and is added when you view the XML with an XML editor. When you write the XML, <map> should always be at the start


Actually, we must have that line in every map xml file. In this case I had to add it back myself.

XML Tutorial wrote:First of all, your XML file must begin with this on the first line:

Code: Select all
<?xml version="1.0"?>
User avatar
Sergeant lackattack
 
Posts: 6096
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby bryguy on Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:45 am

lackattack wrote:
edbeard wrote:I see a lot of people having this

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

at the top of their XML. This is not necessary to my knowledge and is added when you view the XML with an XML editor. When you write the XML, <map> should always be at the start


Actually, we must have that line in every map xml file. In this case I had to add it back myself.

XML Tutorial wrote:First of all, your XML file must begin with this on the first line:

Code: Select all
<?xml version="1.0"?>


what does that line DO anyways?
Corporal bryguy
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby AndyDufresne on Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:56 pm

Edbeard's file was uploaded today I believe.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24919
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby Appalachian on Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:29 am

Has the fix been made?
Anarkistsdream wrote:Says the guy with the drunk Irishman as his avatar!

Go Notre Dame!

;) :lol:


flabio wrote:CHEERS!!!! to you and Erin.....
User avatar
Sergeant Appalachian
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:42 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby edbeard on Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:09 pm

Appalachian wrote:Has the fix been made?


yes it has.
User avatar
Lieutenant edbeard
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:41 am

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby rgbubba on Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:55 pm

Thanks to all for your help in resolving these issues. I hope the next time it will be done better.
"ENJOY THE GAME"
Image
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby scottp on Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:46 pm

RG, thanks for all the work that went into this map. It's one of my favorites.

Hate to bring up a negative, but isn't that Longhorn emblem you're using the copyrighted mark that the University of Texas holds? They do aggressively protect their mark. Just FYI.
User avatar
Major scottp
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Dead Zone, TX

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby rgbubba on Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:54 pm

scottp wrote:RG, thanks for all the work that went into this map. It's one of my favorites.

Hate to bring up a negative, but isn't that Longhorn emblem you're using the copyrighted mark that the University of Texas holds? They do aggressively protect their mark. Just FYI.
Last edited by rgbubba on Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"ENJOY THE GAME"
Image
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby scottp on Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:50 am

okay, cool.

thanks again for the effort. one of my very favorite maps, ESPECIALLY since the old classic and middle earth maps went poof!
User avatar
Major scottp
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Dead Zone, TX

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby nolefan5311 on Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:22 pm

What does the community think about changing the XML and coding Austin as a starting neutral? As it is now, it is included in the randomly allocated territories, and is dropped in a majority of games, causing an unnecessary advantage to the player who drops it.
User avatar
Captain nolefan5311
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby rgbubba on Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:43 pm

Please email me at rgbubba@yahoo.com for any issues you have on the Texan Wars! I might can fix the map!
"ENJOY THE GAME"
Image
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby nolefan5311 on Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:45 pm

You fixing the map would require it to back into Beta phase, when we can just have the Foundry Foreman edit the XML. Are you opposed to the changes?
User avatar
Captain nolefan5311
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby chapcrap on Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:12 pm

I am not opposed. However, if done, I think that giving it a higher bonus would be good. +2 if neutral.
Lieutenant chapcrap
 
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby nolefan5311 on Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:15 pm

chapcrap wrote:I am not opposed. However, if done, I think that giving it a higher bonus would be good. +2 if neutral.


That would require graphic changes to the map, which I'm not sure the mapmaker would be willing/able to do.
User avatar
Captain nolefan5311
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby chapcrap on Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:19 pm

nolefan5311 wrote:
chapcrap wrote:I am not opposed. However, if done, I think that giving it a higher bonus would be good. +2 if neutral.


That would require graphic changes to the map, which I'm not sure the mapmaker would be willing/able to do.

Fine!!

I would be ok with it starting neutral.
Lieutenant chapcrap
 
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Postby GaryDenton on Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:44 am

The map shows bridges between San Antonio and Victoria but they do not connect on the map.

NEVER MIND - I realized those are supposed to be barbed wire.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class GaryDenton
 
Posts: 798
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:58 am
Location: Houston area

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users