Conquer Club

jaytorade wrote:I think there really needs to be an arrow or other indication on the playing area of the map that Fujian and Taipai bombard each other. I didnt realize this just from the layout.

Thanks, Jaytorade

anamainiacks wrote:The 'i' on Jiangxi and Shanghai are rather hard to see on the small map.

Also, not much of a problem, but Bangladesh could be more centralised on the small map. It looks like it could shift up and left a bit more (:

isaiah40 wrote:

jaytorade wrote:I think there really needs to be an arrow or other indication on the playing area of the map that Fujian and Taipai bombard each other. I didnt realize this just from the layout.

Thanks, Jaytorade

You mean like here?

Victor Sullivan wrote:No, I think me meant have an actual arrow on the map (like I suggested I while back ) to make the bombardment more obvious.

-Sully

isaiah40 wrote:

anamainiacks wrote:The 'i' on Jiangxi and Shanghai are rather hard to see on the small map.

Also, not much of a problem, but Bangladesh could be more centralised on the small map. It looks like it could shift up and left a bit more (:

So you can read them right? Can you please explain what you mean by "more centralised"?

isaiah40 wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:No, I think me meant have an actual arrow on the map (like I suggested I while back ) to make the bombardment more obvious.

-Sully

The problem with that is then people would think that they can attack between the two. But let me see what I can do, I would have to squeeze it in the legend without shrinking the text any.

isaiah40 wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:No, I think me meant have an actual arrow on the map (like I suggested I while back ) to make the bombardment more obvious.

-Sully

The problem with that is then people would think that they can attack between the two. But let me see what I can do, I would have to squeeze it in the legend without shrinking the text any.

AndyDufresne wrote:Overall, the few games I've played on this map so far have been pretty great. I might add this map to my regular rotation of 1vs1.


--Andy

Victor Sullivan wrote:Well, the idea is to make the map as player-friendly as possible, yes?

-Sully

MrBenn wrote:

Industrial Helix wrote:Fractured Europe... you mean a topsy-turvey world where Europe is broken into several countries, each ruled by some various party ranging from nazi to monarchy to democracy to communist? It's called the History of Europe since the fall of Rome. I think Europe is already quite fractured and I dunno how easy of a sell this is going to be... what about picking on the USA's great rival Russia... oh-wait... The UK would make a good fractured addition though. My advice is to pick something that isn't already broken up.

On the whole I'd side with IH here...

England has always struggled with Europe - we're in it, but see ourselves as very separate from it. Personally, I would think that very few Brits have a great affinity with Europe and the EU, and as for the rest of Europe, I think it depends on politics much more than any great desire for Continental Unity. Indeed, some of the fiercest rivalrys are held amongst neighbouring states/nations.

Halmir wrote:

MrBenn wrote:

Industrial Helix wrote:Fractured Europe... you mean a topsy-turvey world where Europe is broken into several countries, each ruled by some various party ranging from nazi to monarchy to democracy to communist? It's called the History of Europe since the fall of Rome. I think Europe is already quite fractured and I dunno how easy of a sell this is going to be... what about picking on the USA's great rival Russia... oh-wait... The UK would make a good fractured addition though. My advice is to pick something that isn't already broken up.

On the whole I'd side with IH here...

England has always struggled with Europe - we're in it, but see ourselves as very separate from it. Personally, I would think that very few Brits have a great affinity with Europe and the EU, and as for the rest of Europe, I think it depends on politics much more than any great desire for Continental Unity. Indeed, some of the fiercest rivalrys are held amongst neighbouring states/nations.

The easy way of doing this (with a nod to history) is to look at Britain post Roman but pre Arthur - a whole bunch of warring Baronial states. It doens't take much imagination to see everyone reverting to that after some calamity! Plus you could add in raiding Vikings, Saxons etc.

PS loving the series, keep up the good work!!

chuck_thunder wrote:I love the look of this map. After playing a bit, i think the capital bonus are a bit unbalanced. Perhaps 1, 3, 6, 9 troops would be better.

chuck_thunder wrote:I love the look of this map. After playing a bit, i think the capital bonus are a bit unbalanced. Perhaps 1, 3, 6, 9 troops would be better.

CJ Lues wrote:Hey guys!

Its a nice map! me and my team are playing it at the moment, i love the graphics!

Just one thing... i placed a nice big stack on Hunan, but i can't attack anywhere with it...!

Will someone plz look into it...

Regards,
CJ

isaiah40 wrote:

CJ Lues wrote:Hey guys!

Its a nice map! me and my team are playing it at the moment, i love the graphics!

Just one thing... i placed a nice big stack on Hunan, but i can't attack anywhere with it...!

Will someone plz look into it...

Regards,
CJ

Game number?

Bruceswar wrote:The legend is hard to read. Maybe a slight font change would make it much easier to read? Otherwise nice map.

Gillipig wrote:I'd suggest you make the capitals 3 neutrals instead of 2. As it is now it's all about capitals and very little about the other bonuses.