Page 27 of 27

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:20 am
by Qwert
Im not work with calculation,i work with people and all sugestion what i get i put on vote poll,so you whas late.
Now you can follow mine next maps and give me opinion(WWII EUROPE,WWII ARDENNES OFFENSIVE)

Re:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:49 pm
by porkenbeans
jasnostj wrote:
Sven Hassel wrote:good for your opponent and bad for you :wink:

seriously now the bonus system is quite fine as it is, you can't really have a map with 3 continents, at 5 territories per continent, worth each 4 armies, the map is too small for such big bonuses


Well, they won, but that was mostly because of the lousy team mates I had.

I like objective criteria to determine how the bonuses for new maps are going to be, like the calculation I did, instead of subjective gut feeling, but that's just me. I understand my suggestion is not going to be followed through. I'm fine with that, don't worry. As I said, it helps me determining my strategy on this map.
Yes, and because you calculate the bonuses and take the time to work out a map, you have an advantage over a less skilled player. Which is how it should be. I think that all maps should be made that way. Even "Risk" is set up like this. 8-)