Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:01 amGilligan wrote:So is this going to be "WWII: Australia" in Start a game, join, etc.?
Yup!
Yup!
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
Battle For Australia [Quenched]
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=358&t=14066
Page 15 of 17
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:01 amYup!
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:02 pmWisse wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
Wisse wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
5 Quenches!!!
the 6th one is coming
China?
yup
Looks great.
Yah but, when are they going to be playable?
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:03 pmsorry 
came out wrong. im new to posting, hehehehe 
came out wrong. im new to posting, hehehehe Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:26 amWell done! Great job cairns.
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:56 pmThanks Ruben...I hope everyone enjoys it.Ruben Cassar wrote:Well done! Great job cairns.
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:20 pmits a good map. it has alot of potential. idont think there should be so many area bonuses. 
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 ampeteeson10 wrote:its a good map. it has alot of potential. idont think there should be so many area bonuses.
Thanks peteeson for your suggestion.
The map is now quenched, and up for play.
If there is enough call by other to alter the bnouses, then it may occur, but the bonuses have been worked out by a well-tried formulae.
Hope you enjoy playing the map.Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:52 pmHey cairnswk,
I took too long to install this map and now the XML file is gone. Sorry! Could you re-upload it or send to info@conquerclub.com?
Thanks
I took too long to install this map and now the XML file is gone. Sorry! Could you re-upload it or send to info@conquerclub.com?
Thanks
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:34 amlackattack wrote:Hey cairnswk,
I took too long to install this map and now the XML file is gone. Sorry! Could you re-upload it or send to info@conquerclub.com?
Thanks
Lackattack...no worries....posted below!
http://www.sendspace.com/file/x8laqx
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:01 pmHip hip hooray!
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:05 pmDoes this still have the always neutral territories?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:06 pmgame play is asowme!!
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:07 pmThe Bismarks says 4 but gives 6 is this a bug?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:09 amyes Nc_Hunt3r...you got lucky this round....a fix has been sent to lackattack. Thanks for your post.Nc_Hunt3r wrote:The Bismarks says 4 but gives 6 is this a bug?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:11 amyes coleman...those neutrals are fixed...for now!Coleman wrote:Does this still have the always neutral territories?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:13 amWOW dominationnation...that's excellent feedback so soon.dominationnation wrote:game play is asowme!!
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:59 amNice map, and I checked the XML. No mistakes I found, so the map can really be played as it should be now.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:14 amcairnswk wrote:yes Nc_Hunt3r...you got lucky this round....a fix has been sent to lackattack. Thanks for your post.Nc_Hunt3r wrote:The Bismarks says 4 but gives 6 is this a bug?
lol I didnt get lucky I was on the bad end of someone with bismarcks hehe. Great map though looks good.. Thanks for your hard work
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:50 amForza AZ wrote:Nice map, and I checked the XML. No mistakes I found, so the map can really be played as it should be now.
Thanks Forza AZ. Appreciate you checking.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:52 amNc_Hunt3r wrote:cairnswk wrote:yes Nc_Hunt3r...you got lucky this round....a fix has been sent to lackattack. Thanks for your post.Nc_Hunt3r wrote:The Bismarks says 4 but gives 6 is this a bug?
lol I didnt get lucky I was on the bad end of someone with bismarcks hehe. Great map though looks good.. Thanks for your hard work
Oh I'm sorry
Mmmmm I don't know....maybe it'll all come out in the wash! you know Karma!Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:30 pmI like the map, but having all the neutrals in the middle could give someone a distinct advantage. Was it a fluke that our game has neutrals in just the middle band of territories? (548042) If there's going to be neutrals, they should be mixed up.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:51 pmNight Strike wrote:I like the map, but having all the neutrals in the middle could give someone a distinct advantage. Was it a fluke that our game has neutrals in just the middle band of territories? (548042) If there's going to be neutrals, they should be mixed up.
Thanks Night Strike for your comments...those neutrals in the middle are deliberate...this whole concept is meant to represent the attack from the north by the Japanese and the holding of the south by the Allies...the neutrals in the middle are territories that were conquered by both side in order to destroy the Japanese advance on Australia. Regardless of this fact, if you play the map like a normal map, there are definite chalenges in there to overcome, and eveyone can still enjoy it.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:54 pmso its normal in a 4 player game for each player to have 12 countries and neutral to start with 18?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:38 pmnmhunate wrote:so its normal in a 4 player game for each player to have 12 countries and neutral to start with 18?
Yes, that correct nmhunate!
v32 Sepik River Update
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:52 am
