Battle For Australia [Quenched]

by **cairnswk** on Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:11 am

v34 Small

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... av034S.jpg

Large

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... av034L.jpg

by **Teya** on Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:26 am

You have different explanations on small & large map.. I also dont think you need to put the "on this map" part, but thats just me.

by **cairnswk** on Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:20 am

Teya wrote:You have different explanations on small & large map.. I also dont think you need to put the "on this map" part, but thats just me.

Teya...can u do a refresh in your browser please.

by **lackattack** on Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:14 am

18 neutral territories are deployed sounds off to me.

how about 18 territories are initially neutral on this map?

by **cairnswk** on Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:34 am

lackattack wrote:18 neutral territories are deployed sounds off to me.

how about 18 territories are initially neutral on this map?

Done Lackattack...as below:

Small V35

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... av035S.jpg

Large V35

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... av035L.jpg

by **lackattack** on Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:15 pm

done!

by **Heimdall** on Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:59 pm

I just started two 6 player games on this map and i swear the the neutrals are in the exact same spot in both games? Am i dreaming? :roll:

Games
600987
573527

by **DiM** on Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:15 pm

Heimdall wrote:I just started two 6 player games on this map and i swear the the neutrals are in the exact same spot in both games? Am i dreaming?
Games
600987
573527

this map has 18 teritories that start as neutral in each game. they are the same every time.

by **Heimdall** on Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:42 pm

DiM wrote:
Heimdall wrote:I just started two 6 player games on this map and i swear the the neutrals are in the exact same spot in both games? Am i dreaming?
Games
600987
573527

this map has 18 teritories that start as neutral in each game. they are the same every time.

That can be fixed i hope?

by **yeti_c** on Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:02 am

Nope - that's the way the map is to be played...

It's to promote Japan vs Australia gameplay.

C.

by **Qwert** on Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:17 am

I think that Andy must create new subforum for quenched maps.

by **cairnswk** on Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:45 am

yeti_c wrote:Nope - that's the way the map is to be played...

It's to promote Japan vs Australia gameplay.

C.

All...its not only to promote the Japan Vs the Allies gameplay but also a north vs south gameplay.

I agree also with Qwert above....it would be nice to have a quenched sub forum alongside a Final Forge sub forum.

by **ga7** on Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:58 pm

I just noticed there was some misspelled names, so if you ever do an update:
Bouganville should be Bougainville
Choisuel should be Choiseul

by **cairnswk** on Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:58 pm

Lackattack.

As per our previous conversation some weeks ago, i have changed the Battle For Australia map to no neutrals, and changed the notation on the map accordingly.

I have also changed the names on each map for Bougainville and Choiseul
as per the post above from ga7.

Links

XML

http://h1.ripway.com/cairnswk/battle_fo ... utrals.xml

V36 Small

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... av036S.jpg

v36 Large

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... av036L.jpg

V36 Small

v36 Large

by **BeakerWMA** on Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:07 pm

No neutrals makes me sad

I hated that the first time I played the map, but after awhile I thought it set it apart and grew to like it.

by **cairnswk** on Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:10 pm

BeakerWMA wrote:No neutrals makes me sad

I hated that the first time I played the map, but after awhile I thought it set it apart and grew to like it.

BeakerWMA....sorry about that, but i will PM lackattack and ask him if it is possible to have both neutral and non-neutral version available.

by **unriggable** on Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:44 pm

No neutrals? WTF? that's what makes this map so awesome...

by **cairnswk** on Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:52 pm

BeakerWMA wrote:No neutrals makes me sad

I hated that the first time I played the map, but after awhile I thought it set it apart and grew to like it.

BreakWMA......unfortunately lackattack has said her prefers to not have two versions available to keep things unconfusing. so for now BFA will go to no neutrals for the time being.

by **unriggable** on Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:39 pm

cairnswk wrote:
BeakerWMA wrote:No neutrals makes me sad

I hated that the first time I played the map, but after awhile I thought it set it apart and grew to like it.

BreakWMA......unfortunately lackattack has said her prefers to not have two versions available to keep things unconfusing. so for now BFA will go to no neutrals for the time being.

Sigh...that kind of makes it lose it's flavor. Why did he say he wanted no neutrals? The notice on the top right is self explanatory.

by **cairnswk** on Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:37 am

unriggable wrote:
cairnswk wrote:
BeakerWMA wrote:No neutrals makes me sad

I hated that the first time I played the map, but after awhile I thought it set it apart and grew to like it.

BreakWMA......unfortunately lackattack has said her prefers to not have two versions available to keep things unconfusing. so for now BFA will go to no neutrals for the time being.

Sigh...that kind of makes it lose it's flavor. Why did he say he wanted no neutrals? The notice on the top right is self explanatory.

Lack didn't say he wanted no neutrals...i decided to change because not everyone was happy with all those neutral terts, and using neutrals also makes some of the map totally useless if nobody is going to conquer those neutral terts, and that is generally what happens.

by **nagerous** on Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:57 pm

Maybe it shouldn't say all neutral territories have been removed as that just creates confusion now.

by **cairnswk** on Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:40 pm

nagerous wrote:Maybe it shouldn't say all neutral territories have been removed as that just creates confusion now.

ah...time to have it removed then. thanks nagerous.

by **iancanton** on Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:12 pm

in the xml, bougainville is misspelled bouganville, though it's spelled correctly on the map.

ian.

by **iancanton** on Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:53 am

iancanton wrote:in the xml, bougainville is misspelled bouganville, though it's spelled correctly on the map.

any chance of fixing the xml error?

ian.

by **cairnswk** on Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:21 pm

iancanton wrote:
iancanton wrote:in the xml, bougainville is misspelled bouganville, though it's spelled correctly on the map.

any chance of fixing the xml error?

ian.

Sent

Battle For Australia [Quenched]

V34 Update with Notation about neutrals

V35 Updates

V36 Small and Large no neutral changes.

Re:

Re: Re:

Re: Re:

Who is online