Conquer Club

Graphics are nice.

I'd like to see more mechanics in the gameplay. Like, you could have a power source, which moves a cog, which in turn moves a belt which moves some contraption... each part of the machine having a different function and awarding different bonuses.

Also, more territories would be good.

natty_dread wrote:Graphics are nice.

10x

natty_dread wrote:I'd like to see more mechanics in the gameplay. Like, you could have a power source, which moves a cog, which in turn moves a belt which moves some contraption... each part of the machine having a different function and awarding different bonuses.
Also, more territories would be good.

i'm not sure how i could do what you're asking. on the paper i will actually draw a map with teritories with mountains and rivers and stuff. and some terits will be special (ie: the steam will be steam geysers). so it's not going to be a blueprint of a weird contraption where each part is a terit. right now i just have some icons with lines between them because it's only a temporary thing until i get a better idea about the gameplay.
i could come up with more intricate bonuses and perhaps even more terits but keep in mind i would like to make this as a fast to play 2-4 player map with less than 40 terits.

new version
V3.
* redid the terits to better express what i plan to do.
* added baloons ports and various stuff around the map
* changed bonuses and rules (see map legend)
* the number of terits is now 44 but i will surely lower it in the next version by uniting some smaller terits. probably going to drop to 36

If you are still keen to have an "Age of " name, perhaps "Age of Mechanics" would serve.

I'll disagree on Age of Mechanics. It sounds like a dystopian future where unions finally triumphed and we pay exorbitant prices on oil changes.

i'm pretty satisfied with SteamWorks right now.
i'd appreciate some feedback on gameplay.

DiM wrote:i'm pretty satisfied with SteamWorks right now.
i'd appreciate some feedback on gameplay.

When i saw anchors and what appear to be different continents, i thought AoM again. I could be wrong, but thought you were aiming for something different.

At a quick glance, I'm not entirely confident that you can have an objective be killer neutral, as I believe the killer neutral goes into effect before the objective.

-Sully

cairnswk wrote:

DiM wrote:i'm pretty satisfied with SteamWorks right now.
i'd appreciate some feedback on gameplay.

When i saw anchors and what appear to be different continents, i thought AoM again. I could be wrong, but thought you were aiming for something different.

graphically speaking there could be similarities and that would not be a problem. after all AoM is placed in a fictive 18-19th century world while Steamworks is placed in a fantasy 19th century. so design-wise surely some things will be very similar. i just add pipes, steam, some cogs, perhaps some blueprints of a weird contraption and voila...steampunk
last night i got the idea to make some floating landmasses in a sort of isometric view and unite them via zeppelins and floating ships. that would truly be steampunk.
the only problem is that i can't possibly fit that into the current map size. so either i get approval for a supersize map or i reduce the number of terits.

i will try to present a different version later tonight.

Victor Sullivan wrote:At a quick glance, I'm not entirely confident that you can have an objective be killer neutral, as I believe the killer neutral goes into effect before the objective.

-Sully

i hate xml destroying or limiting all my plans

DiM wrote:the only problem is that i can't possibly fit that into the current map size. so either i get approval for a supersize map or i reduce the number of terits.

Well, why don't don't you post one with your ideas, and if people like it, then I'm sure we can approve the extra pixels for it to work.

We need territory names for this to pass on.

Other than that, balloon has two l's.

And we need a value for how much is lost with more than 1 steam.

Industrial Helix wrote:We need territory names for this to pass on.

Other than that, balloon has two l's.

And we need a value for how much is lost with more than 1 steam.

i'm currently redesigning the whole map. i'm remaking the borders, rethinking the bonuses improving the steampunk theme by using a historical location (even if it is from an alternate reality). i will post something when i'm finished.
oh, and the map is now 1000*1000px

V4 comes with a big update
Done:
*new terits (40) - a fantasy England torn apart by Evil Dr.DiM (:P) from his laboratory in Oxford.
*new bonuses - (need discussing)
*various artwork
*map is now playable by up to 8 people

to do:
*i still need to add some lines and various artwork on the map itself (some ships, waves, dragons, etc) to make it even more realistic.
*balance gameplay - discuss bonuses
*get permission for current size

Does "Engine + 2 steam = loss" mean that you're out of the game if you hold them?

Hm. What if you hold 2 engines and 2 steams, will that cancel the effect of "blown engine" or are you still out of the game?

Either way, I'm not sure if it'll work - the losing condition is coded as a set of territories you need to hold to stay in the game...

natty_dread wrote:Does "Engine + 2 steam = loss" mean that you're out of the game if you hold them?

Hm. What if you hold 2 engines and 2 steams, will that cancel the effect of "blown engine" or are you still out of the game?

Either way, I'm not sure if it'll work - the losing condition is coded as a set of territories you need to hold to stay in the game...

the idea is that if you have more steam than engines you lose the game.
if that can't be coded then i guess i could do a negative bonus. something like:
7 engine + 1 steam = +7
...
3 engine + 1 steam = +3
2 engine + 1 steam = +2
1 engine + 1 steam = +1
1 engine + 2 steam = +0
1 engine + 3 steam = -1
...
1 engine + 7 steam = -5

would that be possible?

Yeah I don't think the losing condition can be coded like that. The losing condition works by having a list of sets of territories/continents in the xml, and you need to hold x of these sets on any given time to stay in the game. So it's really more based on losing a territory rather than holding one.

The negative bonus is doable, it just needs quite a bit of coding - you need to enter all combinations of steam and engine amounts in the xml as individual bonuses.

natty_dread wrote:Yeah I don't think the losing condition can be coded like that. The losing condition works by having a list of sets of territories/continents in the xml, and you need to hold x of these sets on any given time to stay in the game. So it's really more based on losing a territory rather than holding one.

The negative bonus is doable, it just needs quite a bit of coding - you need to enter all combinations of steam and engine amounts in the xml as individual bonuses.

ok, thanks for the input. i'll do the negative bonuses instead.

Too bad losing conditions like that are not (yet) possible, but i'm quite sure it's possible to get a negative bonus (i'm not sure what happens to the game if someone happens to end up with -1 armies to deploy tho). i have done something simular in operation drug war but it still required quite a bit of code. the only difference is that in ODW i didn't have negative numbers as far as i remember but the idea is the same.

something along the lines of "when you hold X amount of steam and X amount of engines you get X bonus" should be perfectly possible and not even too hard.

The map and gameplay look promising, i like the idea of risking to die (or losing your extra resources) while taking the objective (much like oasis, but still completely different). The paper looks very realistic now too, however the colors seem to be floating above the paper instead of actually being written on the paper, maybe you could try to blend them in a bit. This is especially visible at the limegreen, red, yellow and purple lines, slightly less so on the other bright colors. Also, the steam on the regions might be hard to see for people with eyeproblems, maybe you should think about those people too and try to find a solution for ti without destroying the graphics too much. The limegreen island is currently overpowered (bonus of 5 and only 1 border)

zimmah wrote:Too bad losing conditions like that are not (yet) possible, but i'm quite sure it's possible to get a negative bonus (i'm not sure what happens to the game if someone happens to end up with -1 armies to deploy tho). i have done something simular in operation drug war but it still required quite a bit of code. the only difference is that in ODW i didn't have negative numbers as far as i remember but the idea is the same.

something along the lines of "when you hold X amount of steam and X amount of engines you get X bonus" should be perfectly possible and not even too hard.

The map and gameplay look promising, i like the idea of risking to die (or losing your extra resources) while taking the objective (much like oasis, but still completely different). The paper looks very realistic now too, however the colors seem to be floating above the paper instead of actually being written on the paper, maybe you could try to blend them in a bit. This is especially visible at the limegreen, red, yellow and purple lines, slightly less so on the other bright colors. Also, the steam on the regions might be hard to see for people with eyeproblems, maybe you should think about those people too and try to find a solution for ti without destroying the graphics too much. The limegreen island is currently overpowered (bonus of 5 and only 1 border)

thanks for the input zimmah. the bonuses are totally debatable i just threw around some numbers to get a feel of what it might look. so if anybody has bonus suggestions feel free to voice them and we'll have a chat.

i know that the colours don't quite blend in. i could easily do that but i'm afraid they might not be so well to distinguish. on the other hand having those colours is not really that important because people can easily identify the regions from the minimap mock-up so i could even take them out altogether.
i will also make the steam from the regions much more visible.

in the meantime i'd love to hear gameplay feedback from everybody. what bonuses should i place, what connections should i add/remove what terits should have engines/steam/etc?

zimmah wrote:... (i'm not sure what happens to the game if someone happens to end up with -1 armies to deploy tho). ...

There is a failsafe in the code such that regardless of calculated bonuses, you always have at least one troop to deploy on each round.

First, I must say your map is simply stunning! Second, I must say that I do see some problems gameplay-wise:

• The continent names need to be more prominent; I don't even see one for the blue island.
• The island bonuses definitely need adjustment:
  
  • Blue: +1 (4 territories, 1 border)
  • Orange: +1 (5 territories, 1 border)
  • Red: +2 (6 territories, 2 borders)
  • Yellow: +2 or +3 (7 territories, 2 borders)
  • Magenta: +2 or +3 (7 territories, 2 borders)
  • Brown: +1 (5 territories, 1 border)
  • Green: +1 (5 territories, 1 border)
  • (Remember each will receive an additional +1 for holding the engine and steam)
• That being said, I think movement overall has been stifled on this map. No island should have only one border, and I'd even argue 2 is a little small. I suggest that each island should have one port and one balloon and Oxford should be able to bombard the whole map. I realize this may be a bit extreme, but I think these adjustments will improve the gameplay fourfold. Oxford would be a little more involved, as it wouldn't just be a piece of the objective, it could be used strategically as a way to break bonuses (and you could really screw someone over by bombarding someone's engine and overloading their other with steam, if they had 2 and 2) and it would be a great tool for fog games. Since Oxford doesn't assault anything, I think it balances out the power.
• If each island were to have one port and one balloon, I'd make the bonus changes as follows:
  
  • Blue: +2 (4 territories, 2 borders)
  • Orange: +2 (5 territories, 2 borders)
  • Red: +2 or +3 (6 territories, 2 borders)
  • Yellow: +3 (7 territories, 2 borders)
  • Magenta: +3 (7 territories, 2 borders)
  • Brown: +2 (5 territories, 2 borders)
  • Green: +2 (5 territories, 2 borders)
• If Oxford's bombardment power were implemented, too:
  
  • Blue: +2 (4 territories, 2 borders, 4 bombardments)
  • Orange: +3 (5 territories, 2 borders, 5 bombardments)
  • Red: +4 (6 territories, 2 borders, 6 bombardments)
  • Yellow: +5 (7 territories, 2 borders, 7 bombardments)
  • Magenta: +5 (7 territories, 2 borders, 7 bombardments)
  • Brown: +3 (5 territories, 2 borders, 5 bombardments)
  • Green: +3 (5 territories, 2 borders, 5 bombardments)
• I imagine engines, steam and Oxford will start neutral? That's 24 deployable, so that's decent. I'd suggest neutral 2's on the steam and engines, or 1 on steam and 2 on engines, to promote using those bonuses instead of early eliminations in 7-8 player games. And maybe 5 neutral on Oxford?

This is great work, DiM, I am very excited about this map

-Sully

Victor Sullivan wrote:First, I must say your map is simply stunning! Second, I must say that I do see some problems gameplay-wise:

• The continent names need to be more prominent; I don't even see one for the blue island.
• The island bonuses definitely need adjustment:
  
  • Blue: +1 (4 territories, 1 border)
  • Orange: +1 (5 territories, 1 border)
  • Red: +2 (6 territories, 2 borders)
  • Yellow: +2 or +3 (7 territories, 2 borders)
  • Magenta: +2 or +3 (7 territories, 2 borders)
  • Brown: +1 (5 territories, 1 border)
  • Green: +1 (5 territories, 1 border)
  • (Remember each will receive an additional +1 for holding the engine and steam)

wouldn't 1-border islands become slightly more rewarding if you also count the steam+engine then? because a +2 bonus on 1 border sounds much more interestng then a +3 bonus on 2 borders to me, or am i seeing this wrong?


/// nvm i should learn to read the complete post before replying,

i very much lke the ideas of extra borders and oxfort being able to bombard the whole map. (why didn't i think of that?)

great input. many thanks.
will get right on it and post an updated version later today.

V5:

DONE:
*steam icons are more visible
*removed continent names
*better blended the continent colours
*changed bonuses
*oxford can bombard any territory
*added ports and balloons to each continent
*each engine and steam will start with 2 neutral
*oxford starts with 5 neutral