Moderator: Cartographers
pepperonibread wrote:Question... How do I start a new poll?
Anarchist wrote:Looks good
Like the "Map of the future" on page 2 a bit more though
darkmagus wrote:If you keep the lost continental borders then I think you should make them even more subtle.
They look good but at the same time they are also slightly annoying.. (insert bad joke about girls here)
1st chair flute wrote:Wade how bout a new version of the map so we can gripe about new changes=)
haoala wrote:i think the sunken lands should be much, much less obvious, perhaps make them the same colour as the sea but their bordersa are ok i guess
wrightfan123 wrote:As the first person to say that you should veto (hey, I used a speeling word!) the submerged stuff, I will speak for anyone else who votes for that. I think with them it looks to cluttered. Maybe if you tone it down a whole lot, but otherwise, trash them.
wrightfan123 wrote:to answer your question, they look pretty cool...
pepperonibread wrote:wrightfan123 wrote:As the first person to say that you should veto (hey, I used a speeling word!) the submerged stuff, I will speak for anyone else who votes for that. I think with them it looks to cluttered. Maybe if you tone it down a whole lot, but otherwise, trash them.
I'm not sure if I like them that much either, but didn't you say this earlier:wrightfan123 wrote:to answer your question, they look pretty cool...
Flip-Flop!
haoala wrote:logically, Antarctica shouldnt even exists since it was the melting of it that contributed to the rising of sealevels. But of course this map would be unthinkable of without antarctica, so i guess theres no choice, but perhaps you could make just little islands in place of the large territories there are now.
just a suggestion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users