Conquer Club

Extreme Global Warming [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby pepperonibread on Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:43 am

Question... How do I start a new poll?
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Postby DiM on Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:34 am

pepperonibread wrote:Question... How do I start a new poll?


ask a mod to remove the old one and then edit first post to insert new poll.
ā€œIn the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.ā€- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby Anarchist on Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:27 am

Looks good

Like the "Map of the future" on page 2 a bit more though

can always make human built Atols aswell
just a thought
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Anarchist
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:25 am
Location: A little island in the Pacific

Postby haoala on Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:12 am

actually, i would prefer it without you showing how the continents sank, they are i little confusing when looking at the continents
Gain the upper hand
User avatar
Lieutenant haoala
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Directly opposite the South of Napo

Postby darkmagus on Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:29 am

If you keep the lost continental borders then I think you should make them even more subtle.
They look good but at the same time they are also slightly annoying.. (insert bad joke about girls here)
Private darkmagus
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 4:18 pm

Postby pepperonibread on Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:41 pm

Anarchist wrote:Looks good

Like the "Map of the future" on page 2 a bit more though


Alright, but what's that map based on?

darkmagus wrote:If you keep the lost continental borders then I think you should make them even more subtle.
They look good but at the same time they are also slightly annoying.. (insert bad joke about girls here)


Yeah, I agree, there's going to be a poll on that soon.
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Postby JafnhƔr on Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:51 pm

Looks good. However, in my opinion, the lands that have sunk could be a bit less obvious - but still clear to a careful eye.

btw, remember to add the latest update to the first page. ;)
User avatar
Sergeant JafnhƔr
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:48 am
Location: ƍsland

Postby 1st chair flute on Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:11 pm

Wade how bout a new version of the map so we can gripe about new changes=)
Cook 1st chair flute
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:31 pm
Location: Aiur

Postby pepperonibread on Wed Apr 18, 2007 5:44 pm

1st chair flute wrote:Wade how bout a new version of the map so we can gripe about new changes=)


It's coming.

P.S.: Learn how to use real smileys.
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Postby KEYOGI on Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:15 pm

Do you think I should keep going with this map?

Yes
65% [ 87 ]
No
34% [ 45 ]

Total Votes : 132
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Contrickster on Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:19 pm

I think it's a great map. Keep going. If nothing else because it's such a great parody of an aspect popular culture. A broad grin breaks out on my face every time I see the latest version.
Corporal 1st Class Contrickster
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby haoala on Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:01 am

i think the sunken lands should be much, much less obvious, perhaps make them the same colour as the sea but their bordersa are ok i guess
Gain the upper hand
User avatar
Lieutenant haoala
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Directly opposite the South of Napo

Postby Anarchist on Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:33 am

i like being able to see the land that has sunk,it makes it look better and feel so real! :P

I think page 2 was based on elevations not sure, with ppls comments yours became less believable then the others(good map regardless)

dont mind the non-habitable zone at all!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Anarchist
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:25 am
Location: A little island in the Pacific

Postby pepperonibread on Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:38 am

haoala wrote:i think the sunken lands should be much, much less obvious, perhaps make them the same colour as the sea but their bordersa are ok i guess


Yeah, I'll probably just end up making them fainter.
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Postby wrightfan123 on Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:30 pm

As the first person to say that you should veto (hey, I used a speeling word!) the submerged stuff, I will speak for anyone else who votes for that. I think with them it looks to cluttered. Maybe if you tone it down a whole lot, but otherwise, trash them.
User avatar
Corporal wrightfan123
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Looking over every baseball team's schedule to try to determine who will win the World Series.

Postby pepperonibread on Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:47 pm

wrightfan123 wrote:As the first person to say that you should veto (hey, I used a speeling word!) the submerged stuff, I will speak for anyone else who votes for that. I think with them it looks to cluttered. Maybe if you tone it down a whole lot, but otherwise, trash them.


I'm not sure if I like them that much either, but didn't you say this earlier:

wrightfan123 wrote:to answer your question, they look pretty cool...


Flip-Flop!
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Postby wrightfan123 on Fri Apr 20, 2007 6:45 pm

pepperonibread wrote:
wrightfan123 wrote:As the first person to say that you should veto (hey, I used a speeling word!) the submerged stuff, I will speak for anyone else who votes for that. I think with them it looks to cluttered. Maybe if you tone it down a whole lot, but otherwise, trash them.


I'm not sure if I like them that much either, but didn't you say this earlier:

wrightfan123 wrote:to answer your question, they look pretty cool...


Flip-Flop!


Yes, I'm a hypocrit, get used to it.
User avatar
Corporal wrightfan123
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Looking over every baseball team's schedule to try to determine who will win the World Series.

Postby wrightfan123 on Sun Apr 22, 2007 2:28 pm

bump!
User avatar
Corporal wrightfan123
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Looking over every baseball team's schedule to try to determine who will win the World Series.

Postby mibi on Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:58 pm

what happened to the DEATH ZONE!??!
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby pepperonibread on Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:40 pm

It... died.
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Postby haoala on Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:32 am

logically, Antarctica shouldnt even exists since it was the melting of it that contributed to the rising of sealevels. But of course this map would be unthinkable of without antarctica, so i guess theres no choice, but perhaps you could make just little islands in place of the large territories there are now.

just a suggestion ;)
Gain the upper hand
User avatar
Lieutenant haoala
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Directly opposite the South of Napo

Postby pepperonibread on Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:21 am

haoala wrote:logically, Antarctica shouldnt even exists since it was the melting of it that contributed to the rising of sealevels. But of course this map would be unthinkable of without antarctica, so i guess theres no choice, but perhaps you could make just little islands in place of the large territories there are now.

just a suggestion ;)


That already was covered a few pages back.
Pretty much, Antarctica is a landmass, so it wouldn't disappear, but the ice on top of it would melt, yielding something like my first update.
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

It's a...

Postby MonkeyCrazy12321 on Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:10 am

I think it will draw a lot of awareness to global warming plus it looks as if it will be a really fun map! plz get this map up and running asap. :P
User avatar
Private MonkeyCrazy12321
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:19 am
Location: Vancouver

Postby haoala on Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:13 am

o sorry i thought it was made entirely out of ice! <blushes> haha just shows how ignorant i am. but is it a whole landmass covered by ice? or a few little bits here and there connected by ice
Gain the upper hand
User avatar
Lieutenant haoala
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Directly opposite the South of Napo

Postby pepperonibread on Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:10 pm

Antarctica would basically look like that without its ice.
If you look at an elevation map, Antarctica would look like a big plateau because of all the ice.
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users