Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:46 pm
Actually, a thought just occurs. Unless there are duplicates, any fewer than 25 territories and there wouldn't be enough cards to go around for a higher-number-player game.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=358&t=15897
AndyDufresne wrote:I honestly see no point in this map.
--Andy
Spockers wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:I honestly see no point in this map.
--Andy
fluffybunnykins wrote:I like the idea of combining crayon with satire & Bush-wacking...
how about drawing it as if bush drew it in crayon? some suggestions:-
~ a bit of finger painting?
~ america in the middle of the map?
~ more pics: camels, terrorists, commies, etc?
~ mark the big bit at the bottom-right West New Zealand: it's smaller geographically, but bigger intellectually & culturally
cheeseweasel wrote:fluffybunnykins wrote:I like the idea of combining crayon with satire & Bush-wacking...
how about drawing it as if bush drew it in crayon? some suggestions:-
~ a bit of finger painting?
~ america in the middle of the map?
~ more pics: camels, terrorists, commies, etc?
~ mark the big bit at the bottom-right West New Zealand: it's smaller geographically, but bigger intellectually & culturally
We'll get on that just as soon as the all-German map of the UK is finished. It'll be called "1946 if the Americans hadn't intervened."
fluffybunnykins wrote:cheeseweasel wrote:fluffybunnykins wrote:I like the idea of combining crayon with satire & Bush-wacking...
how about drawing it as if bush drew it in crayon? some suggestions:-
~ a bit of finger painting?
~ america in the middle of the map?
~ more pics: camels, terrorists, commies, etc?
~ mark the big bit at the bottom-right West New Zealand: it's smaller geographically, but bigger intellectually & culturally
We'll get on that just as soon as the all-German map of the UK is finished. It'll be called "1946 if the Americans hadn't intervened."
better late than never, I suppose...
Not quite:Evil DIMwit wrote:note that the bare minimum for full playability card-wise is four per players plus one; if any player gets five, their number is immediately reduced to two)
Andy always says that, early on in map development!Ruben Cassar wrote:Andy has already said he sees no point in making this map so let it die guys.
Captain Crash wrote:Andy always says that, early on in map development!Ruben Cassar wrote:Andy has already said he sees no point in making this map so let it die guys.
Ruben Cassar wrote:Captain Crash wrote:Andy always says that, early on in map development!Ruben Cassar wrote:Andy has already said he sees no point in making this map so let it die guys.
Is that so? I don't think he does actually...
Captain Crash wrote:Not quite:Evil DIMwit wrote:note that the bare minimum for full playability card-wise is four per players plus one; if any player gets five, their number is immediately reduced to two)
4 per player plus n.
Where n= number of players.
You get the 5th at the end of your turn, you don't need to cash these cards in until the start of your next turn, meanwhile all the other players may have accumulated 5 cards.
Agreedalso fireedud wrote:take away the penguins at the top of the page, either put them at the bottom or put polar bears there because penguins live in anatartica and polarbears live in the artic
Captain Crash wrote:Agreedalso fireedud wrote:take away the penguins at the top of the page, either put them at the bottom or put polar bears there because penguins live in anatartica and polarbears live in the artic