Sparqs wrote:As for changing "Kings with Scarabs" to "Tombs with Scarabs," I think it is probably clear the way it is, but change it if you like.
I'm just starting my first game so I don't know how it plays, but the artwork is excellent!
tim02 wrote:looks good I would definetly want to play it a bit semetricle but I still think it's good
Bad Speler wrote:First off let me say its a wonderful map, at first it looked like it would be hard to get the bonuses and that they were too low, but after playing part of my game out, I realised it wasn't as hard as I thought. The one way attacks also add a very good dynamic to the gameplay. In my opinion, this one is better then your other two maps combined (I really hate those 18 neutrals )
(edit) I was surprised to see this map because somehow i managed to miss most of its development. It was a nice surprise
Purposeful1 wrote:fun map definitely adds a different twist with the one-ways; i was caught off-guard by those in the beginning and ended up accidentally fortifying all my armies to a place where i didn't want them, but overall a cool map
Coleman wrote:I'd have to say I didn't follow this much, I found it uncomfortable at the start. I'm playing on it right now, and while I haven't completed a game this looks to be one of the greatest maps I think we've ever had. It really seems to lend itself to my style of play, especially with 6 players.
Gilligan wrote:Cairns, I really gotta hand it to you on this one. At first, I thought "Wow...this is really confusing...", mainly because of the legend. Now, it's one of my favorites, and my favorite 2 player map. Go have fun for a job well done!
nagerous wrote:This map plays like a charm, your best quenched map yet
t.e.c wrote:i've got to say that i didn't like this map at first, as i didn't really understand the bonus system but now i've got the hang of it and it's great
Users browsing this forum: Delf