Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:18 pm
42 active games
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=358&t=19025
lackattack wrote:Updated... however I will mention that the latest graphics have noticeably dropped in quality. Perhaps the change wasn't made using the master file??
carlpgoodrich wrote:I know this map has been quenched, but I have to post this. I just started my first game on this map (Game 7755522), a 6 player game, and the first person to go had a bonus of +4 (from having 12 territs), and the next person had a bonus of +12! I had a bonus of +9. In a 6 player game, these high bonuses, and especially the deviations in them, are very alarming. Was this really intentional?
carlpgoodrich wrote:The thread is 58 pages long, sorry I don't have the time to read it through. I was mostly just wondering if it was a fluke drop or if, as you said, the map justifies it. But sarcasm works too.
vskarica wrote:I can't seem to figure out, how do I conquer airplane.
As stupid as question is.
Please help!
vskarica wrote:THX. I guess I misread instructions and took it for one way attack.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Can this be fixed? Surely you can't agree this is fair...
-Sully
cairnswk wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:Can this be fixed? Surely you can't agree this is fair...
-Sully
What do you want fixed Sully? I can't tell a damned thing from your graphic
carlpgoodrich wrote:I think Sully is referring to the uneven "troops due" to begin the game. I had the same reaction the first time I played the map. But Sully, the map works... its actually a bit brilliant. Just let the game play out.
Victor Sullivan wrote:cairnswk wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:Can this be fixed? Surely you can't agree this is fair...
-Sully
What do you want fixed Sully? I can't tell a damned thing from your graphic
Gee, cairns, you take criticism so lightly, don't you? Don't worry, cairns, you'll find that spring in your step soon enough.
...
-Sully
InsomniaRed wrote:In Sully's defense, I doubt someone who had a screenshot and a quick question wanted to read 60 pages just to most likely still be adamant on asking said question/posting said screenshot.