Conquer Club

The Official Canada REVAMP Competition is now closed.

A big thanks to everyone who participated. The following links will remain to recognize the efforts of all those involved.

Bad Speler: Clicky
gimil: Clicky
Keredrex: Clicky
pepperonibread: Clicky
reverend_kyle: Clicky
WidowMakers: Clicky
WidowMakers (ineligible): Clicky

Let us vote for the revamper!

BTW It looks fine.

unriggable wrote:BTW It looks fine.

I could make this in Power Point. How does it look fine?

Could someone explain four way borders and what the problem is with them to me? Everyone says the one in Indochina was resolved with the revamp, but I didn't notice any difference.

I say the revamp should be a black and white sketch in paint lol...jk

Coleman wrote:

unriggable wrote:BTW It looks fine.

I could make this in Power Point. How does it look fine?

Could someone explain four way borders and what the problem is with them to me? Everyone says the one in Indochina was resolved with the revamp, but I didn't notice any difference.

It's not as bad as other maps out there

Four way borders...you don't know if you can atack a certain country.

Yeah, I agree...some other maps need it more, but oh well, eventually all will probably be redone :S

How come there is being a canada revamp before a GB one, i dont have any real problemswith the graphics here and the gameplay is good. From what your saying, there is no innacuracy eather, so why this one and not GB?

Balsiefen wrote:How come there is being a canada revamp before a GB one, i dont have any real problemswith the graphics here and the gameplay is good. From what your saying, there is no innacuracy eather, so why this one and not GB?

I believe the British Isles cartographer has specifically stated that he or she is against a revamp. And, to clarify a revamp is not about fixing inaccuracies or changing gameplay. It is about graphics. Fixing inaccuracies would not require a revamp.

I doubt many people have noticed, but a fix was recently made to the Philippines map regard an incorrect name for an area. It doesn't require a revamp. Though honestly that change probably had something to do with cagayan and cayagan being so close in spelling and easily mixed up more so than accuracy.

Sorry to go off topic, just wanted to clarify things.

Dont worry guys ill beat Widow Maker this time

gimil wrote:Dont worry guys ill beat Widow Maker this time

i'll get the baseball bat you get a pipe and we'll kick the crap of of him

DiM wrote:

gimil wrote:Dont worry guys ill beat Widow Maker this time

i'll get the baseball bat you get a pipe and we'll kick the crap of of him

now DiM thats not how we do it

Ill charm him, you slip the date rape drug in his drink. He'll never know what hit him

edbeard wrote:

Balsiefen wrote:How come there is being a canada revamp before a GB one, i dont have any real problemswith the graphics here and the gameplay is good. From what your saying, there is no innacuracy eather, so why this one and not GB?

I believe the British Isles cartographer has specifically stated that he or she is against a revamp. And, to clarify a revamp is not about fixing inaccuracies or changing gameplay. It is about graphics. Fixing inaccuracies would not require a revamp.

Well why wont the map-maker fix the innacuracies?all it needs is to change a few names!

edbeard wrote:

Balsiefen wrote:How come there is being a canada revamp before a GB one, i dont have any real problemswith the graphics here and the gameplay is good. From what your saying, there is no innacuracy eather, so why this one and not GB?

I believe the British Isles cartographer has specifically stated that he or she is against a revamp. And, to clarify a revamp is not about fixing inaccuracies or changing gameplay. It is about graphics. Fixing inaccuracies would not require a revamp.

Well why wont the map-maker fix the innacuracies?all it needs is to change a few names!

gimil wrote:rape

Kaplowitz wrote:

gimil wrote:rape

kap knows to much

(Maybe if I talk like qwert I'll get a real answer...)

I still not understand what is mean by four way borders.

Coleman wrote:(Maybe if I talk like qwert I'll get a real answer...)

I still not understand what is mean by four way borders.

which places can attack eachother?

Can 1 attack 3?

In the Canada map, their is only one 4-way border:


Personally, I believe it should be left there, because it is the actual border between the provinces and territories

personally being from canada, i really hope the revamp makes the map even better than it is currently. revamp or not this map looks great by itself.

just for the love of god, no middle east style!!!!!

Ive seen gimils map and it looks good

cena-rules wrote:Ive seen gimils map and it looks good

thanks cena. Had a scare and though the file had went corrupt. Luckily i had it backed up

KEYOGI wrote:[*]Anybody may have a go, but they must send their drafts to me via PM.

could you clarify this abit? you need a draft a final version each update or what?

if i send you a draft even if it is of low quality am i in the competition?

or can i send you the final image 5 minutes before the deadline?

how does this work exactly?

I think this is one of the last maps to need a rewamp, but really I don't care what you do, just make sure you listen to jako

jako wrote:just for the love of god, no middle east style!!!!!

Ok, to clear up a couple of points.

1. The British Isles map is being worked on by the original cartographer.

2. The four-way border will have to be fixed.

3. Sending a draft to me via PM is exactly what is meant. It is up to the individual the quality of the draft they send. I will accept updated drafts to provide feedback on if required. The last version I receive will be the version put before the foundry for a vote.

4. What's wrong with the Middle East?

KEYOGI wrote:4. What's wrong with the Middle East?

that style of map is the last thing I think of when I think of the country canada.

I very much liked gimils notepad style map with indochina because it made me think indochina.. i'm sad I couldn't vote for it, but canada for christ sake?