Page 26 of 27

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:32 pm
by chapcrap
koontz1973 wrote:Thanks ManB, will get it done very soon now. Expect it no later than this time tomorrow.

You're my new favorite. Can I buy you some flowers or syrup or something?

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:42 pm
by koontz1973
Here you go guys. The new xml.

This one has the decay regions as positions with a max of 3 given out to players. With no underlying neutrals the rest will go into normal deployment but this should stop 99.9% of unbalanced games. If it turns out it does not work, then neutrals can go into the others easily.

Secondly, Norfolk is now a 3 neutral so in 1v1 games, both should start with 11 territs.

Used the old xml for territ, continent order and also for cords so there is no change there.

Dustbolw.xml
(14.33 KiB) Downloaded 828 times

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:49 pm
by chapcrap
koontz1973 wrote:Here you go guys. The new xml.

This one has the decay regions as positions with a max of 3 given out to players. With no underlying neutrals the rest will go into normal deployment but this should stop 99.9% of unbalanced games. If it turns out it does not work, then neutrals can go into the others easily.

Secondly, Norfolk is now a 3 neutral so in 1v1 games, both should start with 11 territs.

Used the old xml for territ, continent order and also for cords so there is no change there.

Dustbolw.xml

Dustbolw?

The rest sounds great!! :D

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:33 am
by koontz1973
Is this new xml OK and if so, has it been sent/uploaded yet?

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:30 am
by thenobodies80
Will check it this evening, when back at home ;)

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:23 pm
by chapcrap
thenobodies80 wrote:Will check it this evening, when back at home ;)

Well?

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:07 pm
by thenobodies80
chapcrap wrote:
thenobodies80 wrote:Will check it this evening, when back at home ;)

Well?


Ehm well I forgot about it :oops:
Going to do it now...sorry O:)

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:53 pm
by thenobodies80
The xml is ok. I've already sent it.

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:44 pm
by koontz1973
Great new and thanks.

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:46 pm
by agentcom
So does that mean the map has been changed?

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 11:15 pm
by koontz1973
nobodies will post when it has.

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:13 am
by chapcrap
Have the changes been uploaded?

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:26 pm
by koontz1973
koontz1973 wrote:nobodies will post when it has.

This, have patience, we are going through a change at the top and things take time. Just look at knights map. We are playing Halloween and I want the Xmas played on now. :P

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:04 pm
by chapcrap
koontz1973 wrote:
koontz1973 wrote:nobodies will post when it has.

This, have patience, we are going through a change at the top and things take time. Just look at knights map. We are playing Halloween and I want the Xmas played on now. :P

A change at the top!! Psh!

It all sounds like smoke and mirrors to me! ;)

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:34 pm
by thenobodies80
There's a small technical problem we need to solve due the recent changes. O:)
Be patient, i think it won't take so much time.

Sorry for the inconvenince

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:33 pm
by thenobodies80
thenobodies80 wrote:The xml is ok. I've already sent it.


And it has been done. The new xml is online. let me know how it plays now. :)

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:08 pm
by chapcrap
thenobodies80 wrote:
thenobodies80 wrote:The xml is ok. I've already sent it.


And it has been done. The new xml is online. let me know how it plays now. :)

Will do...

I thought the new XML was giving 11 starting terts instead of 12. I must have been wrong about that, because I'm starting with 12.

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:47 pm
by koontz1973
Just checked the xml. North Platte should of started neutral. Added that to this one.
Dustbowl.xml
(14.36 KiB) Downloaded 808 times


Sorry for that. Sent nobodies a Pm to let him know about new xml.

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:53 pm
by thenobodies80
Sent. I will post here when uploaded.

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:55 pm
by chapcrap
koontz1973 wrote:Just checked the xml. North Platte should of started neutral. Added that to this one.
Dustbowl.xml


Sorry for that. Sent nobodies a Pm to let him know about new xml.

Good news!

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:20 pm
by chapcrap

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:47 pm
by nolefan5311


It looks like North Platte somehow got included into the Texas bonus.

Here is the corrected version:

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/5/13/3303803/Dust_Bowl.xml

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:40 am
by thenobodies80
Nolefan, Is this version 100% correct?
Not that i saw something wrong, just asking to not send again a file and having to update it again after just few hours...

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:19 am
by koontz1973
It is not. North Platte does not start neutral.

This is the correct version for you. North Platte starts neutral and does not belong in Texas.

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/1/27/3255536/DB%20correct.xml

Re: Dust Bowl [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:43 am
by nolefan5311
koontz1973 wrote:It is not. North Platte does not start neutral.

This is the correct version for you. North Platte starts neutral and does not belong in Texas.

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/1/27/3255536/DB%20correct.xml


Yeah, I modified the XML in the directory (the one in play), and not the corrected version that koontz posted a couple days ago. Sorry bout that!