Page 23 of 23

Re: The New World [Quenched]

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:42 am
by nolefan5311
ogro wrote:Thank you for your New World map. I enjoy it a lot.
Talking about strategy: How is possible for a player to avoid bombing from Europe to colonies?
I will appreciate your answer.
Regards... and congratulations for the map.


Not sure I really understand the question, but you can always conquer that region from the Landing Point.

Re: The New World [Quenched]

PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:42 pm
by Teflon Kris
Aha !

"+1 for 2 territories within an empire"

"Homelands bombards any other territories within their empire"

Put these together and, by logic, which nobody (except some women arguing) can deny, homelands and landing bases are in the same empire.

therefore their is either a mistake on the map explanation, or in the xml, for thre not to be a +1 bonus for this.

Logically.

:twisted:

Re: The New World [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:11 pm
by gimil
DJ Teflon wrote:Aha !

"+1 for 2 territories within an empire"

"Homelands bombards any other territories within their empire"

Put these together and, by logic, which nobody (except some women arguing) can deny, homelands and landing bases are in the same empire.

therefore their is either a mistake on the map explanation, or in the xml, for thre not to be a +1 bonus for this.

Logically.

:twisted:


Sorry I don't think I understand what you mean?

Re: The New World [Quenched]

PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:57 pm
by Teflon Kris
Homelands and landing bases are in the same empire, so, according to the map information, that is a +1 bonus.

Therefore there is either a mistake on the map explanation, or in the xml, for there not to be a +1 bonus for this (which there isnt).

Only a problem for new players on the map, and most folks would agree that +4 auto and +3 auto is enough bonus for homeland and landing site, no need for the other +1 that the mao text states.

Re: The New World [Quenched]

PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 3:50 pm
by jbenavides333
The South American map could be more historically accurate. The "Mapuche" area has nothing to do with reality. It would be better called "Inca", although still it wouldn't correspond to the real area. The southern "Dutch" area is also an invention. It would be more appropriately called "Inca outposts" or something to that matter (maybe "Patagonia").