Conquer Club

NatNat wrote:why didn't u do london metro

because i'm an aussie

I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

This map is cool and plays great ... a well balanced game in four player sequential where best strategy wins over.. Great Job!!!!

Gilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

That's correct

danfrank wrote:This map is cool and plays great ... a well balanced game in four player sequential where best strategy wins over.. Great Job!!!!

Nice

cairnswk wrote:

Gilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

That's correct

How come Northbridge can't attack Nth Sydney?

Gilligan wrote:

cairnswk wrote:

Gilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

That's correct

How come Northbridge can't attack Nth Sydney?

Ah Gilligan, because it is designed that way

I enjoy the map, it's very fun and different

Just one thing though... it seems weird that Olympic Park is completely isolated from the rest of the territories that make up the same bonus. I know it's too late now, probably, but that ped crossing might make more sense if it was moved from Auburn-Parramatta to Lidcombe-Olympic Park.

Otherwise, I love it!

cairnswk wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

cairnswk wrote:

Gilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

That's correct

How come Northbridge can't attack Nth Sydney?

Ah Gilligan, because it is designed that way

I'm confused...

Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?

Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?

The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.

Bones2484 wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?

The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.

the wording could probably use a tinker.

I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.

edbeard wrote:

Bones2484 wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?

The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.

the wording could probably use a tinker.

I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.

I agree, I had the initial confusion at first too.

Maybe if the "(except for buses)" was taken out and the bottom text was changed to: "Bus Depots can attack any other Bus Depot" to reinforce that freeways aren't a block to them.

just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.

edbeard wrote:

Bones2484 wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?

The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.

the wording could probably use a tinker.

I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.

Agreed. and understood, i'll upload the new images to lackattack now.

cairnswk wrote:

edbeard wrote:

Bones2484 wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?

The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.

the wording could probably use a tinker.

I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.

Agreed. and understood, i'll upload the new images to lackattack now.

Lackattack, please could you upload these two new images below as per the forum request above to remove the phrase "except to buses" from the impassable section of the legend.
Thanks

6 player dubs no cards

Game 3076534

pw: 84ridsei



2 spots!

edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.

Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!

C.

yeti_c wrote:

edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.

Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!

C.

Thanks C for your wisdom and the reminder that you were correct. However some of us older folk don't necessarily see things until experience teaches a lesson.

cairnswk wrote:

yeti_c wrote:

edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.

Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!

C.

Thanks C for your wisdom and the reminder that you were correct. However some of us older folk don't necessarily see things until experience teaches a lesson.

That's OK old man!!!!!

C.

yeti_c wrote:

cairnswk wrote:

yeti_c wrote:

edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.

Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!

C.

Thanks C for your wisdom and the reminder that you were correct. However some of us older folk don't necessarily see things until experience teaches a lesson.

That's OK old man!!!!!

C.

i wonder if i'll be around to be able to call you that. you cheeky sausage

Its an interesting play here Carins. The bonuses are quite high and I'm wondering if that was intentional (I apologize for not having read the first 14 pages of this thread-I did read the last three). I'm not sure if its a good or bad thing but it certainly adds more emphasis on breaking your opponents.

As I said a few days ago, I like the map but I'm still rather curious as to why Olympic Park is completely separated from the rest of the territories that make up the same bonus?

Bones2484 wrote:As I said a few days ago, I like the map but I'm still rather curious as to why Olympic Park is completely separated from the rest of the territories that make up the same bonus?

let's just say its a simple "twist"

cairnswk wrote:

Bones2484 wrote:As I said a few days ago, I like the map but I'm still rather curious as to why Olympic Park is completely separated from the rest of the territories that make up the same bonus?

let's just say its a simple "twist"

part of why it's worth 6 armies