Page 9 of 9

Re: War of the Triple Alliance: edit on p 14 [Quenched]

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:38 pm
by oaktown
Ruben Cassar wrote:However what do the British and their spelling have to do with Argentina? It was under Spanish rule before becoming independent or were the British involved at a later stage? Just curious to know more and maybe slightly off topic. :)

A map has to be told from somebody's point of view... "Bolivian Claim" isn't a Spanish name. I'm a speaker of English making a map - we screw up all kinds of things regardless of the side of the pond in which we live.

Re: War of the Triple Alliance: edit on p 14 [Quenched]

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:30 pm
by oaktown
Seeing no other comments in the past week I'm going to assume the aforementioned suggested fix to corrientes is good and send new files to Lack. I've lightened the coasts along the corrientes borders, so here's what I'm sending...

Click image to enlarge.
image

Click image to enlarge.
image

Re: War of the Triple Alliance: edit on p 14 [Quenched]

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:48 pm
by yeti_c
Just a note - THis is an extremely short thread for a Quenched map in todays forge.

Congrats Oak.

C.

Re: War of the Triple Alliance: edit on p 14 [Quenched]

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:01 pm
by the.killing.44
yeti_c wrote:Just a note - THis is an extremely short thread for a Quenched map in todays forge.

Cairns Metro — 12 pages :O

Beautiful map, although I've yet to win here :(

.44

Re: War of the Triple Alliance: edit on p 14 [Beta]

PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:53 pm
by cassianomonteiro
The spoils from that map are wrong. 3x Green is giving 4 troops, and 3xBlue is giving 6 troops.

Please take a look at the game 4567460.

Cheers!

Re: War of the Triple Alliance: edit on p 14 [Beta]

PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 4:33 pm
by iancanton
cassianomonteiro wrote:The spoils from that map are wrong. 3x Green is giving 4 troops, and 3xBlue is giving 6 troops.

Please take a look at the game 4567460.

Cheers!

there's nothing wrong with the spoils. Game 4567460 has escalating bonuses, so the first set is worth 4 armies, the second set 6, the third set 8 and so on.

ian. :)

Re: War of the Triple Alliance

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:17 am
by Fireside Poet
2009-04-17 19:56:33 - jjmracing gets spoils
2009-04-18 07:33:09 - King Tet receives 3 troops for 6 regions
2009-04-18 07:34:56 - King Tet deployed 2 troops on Espirito Santo
2009-04-18 07:35:21 - King Tet deployed 1 troops on Dourados
2009-04-18 07:35:36 - King Tet assaulted S. Ignacio from Dourados and conquered it from Fireside Poet
2009-04-18 07:39:14 - Incrementing game to round 5
2009-04-18 09:34:40 - Joshua Hayden receives 3 troops for 8 regions
2009-04-18 09:34:59 - Joshua Hayden deployed 3 troops on São Paulo
2009-04-18 09:35:06 - Joshua Hayden assaulted Paraná from São Paulo and conquered it from Fireside Poet
2009-04-18 09:35:16 - Joshua Hayden reinforced São Paulo with 1 troops from Paraná
2009-04-18 09:35:16 - Joshua Hayden gets spoils
2009-04-18 10:37:08 - sure receives 3 troops for 10 regions
2009-04-18 10:37:37 - sure deployed 2 troops on Curitiba
2009-04-18 10:37:41 - sure deployed 1 troops on Bahia Oriental
2009-04-18 10:37:55 - sure assaulted Paraná from Curitiba and conquered it from Joshua Hayden
2009-04-18 10:38:03 - sure gets spoils
2009-04-18 10:44:26 - Fireside Poet receives 3 troops for holding Paraguay
2009-04-18 10:44:26 - Fireside Poet receives 3 troops for 7 regions
2009-04-18 10:44:33 - Fireside Poet deployed 6 troops on Porto Alegre
2009-04-18 10:44:38 - Fireside Poet assaulted São Pedro from Porto Alegre and conquered it from King Tet
2009-04-18 10:47:28 - Fireside Poet gets spoils

Something is wrong with this and I am not sure what happened.
S. Ignacio is in Paraguay and I was clearly attacked and my bonus was broken before my turn and yet I received 3 troops for "holding" it. He also didn't receive any spoils. This is in Game 4652457. Ideas?

Re: War of the Triple Alliance

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:33 am
by Riazor
This is likely to have been caused by that recent server problems ive been reading about? Some deployed armies (in the log) actually never appeared on the board.

map: Triple alliance-Gramatical error's??

PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 8:27 pm
by sudokU
Concise description:
  • In the "Triple Alliance" map there are several names of some territories that atract my attention.

Specifics:
  • Those are: Cordova and Buenos Ayres. I'm not argentinien, I'm from Uruguay (next to it - sorry, my english is not the best). Have you done it like they will write it in that epoca? Because Is not Cordova, it's Cordoba, and Buenos Ayres is Buenos Aires...

Re: map: Triple alliance-Gramatical error's??

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 7:26 am
by karelpietertje
I don't live anywhere near South America, and don't know if this is maybe the local way of spelling it either,
but maybe you could ask it in the map's discussion topic.
it's located here

or you could send the maker of the map, oaktown, a PM.

Re: War of the Triple Alliance

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:08 pm
by sudokU
I send a message to the creator of the map and this is his answer:

"the Triple Alliance is supposed to represent a 19th Century map - some of the spellings used are 19th century English conventions, and were taken directly from maps of that era. In my maps I like to be true to the era I'm representing, even if it means doing things we know are wrong today.

I know that Buenos Aires (and other things) are spelled wrong, but that's how many european mapmakers spelled it 140 years ago! :D

thanks for taking interest,
oaktown"

Re: War of the Triple Alliance

PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:28 pm
by iancanton
talking of misspellings, here is a genuine one: cordilheira geral is correct in the xml and on the large map, but is cordilhiera geral on the small map.

ian. :)

Re: War of the Triple Alliance

PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:29 pm
by oaktown
If anybody cares enough to update it, here's the small image with spelling corrected. Hopefully I pulled up the correct version of the map.

http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r76/ ... 0SMALL.jpg

Thanks to ian for the catch, and to Benn for bringing it to my attention.