Moderator: Cartographers
edbeard wrote:right now I'm not worrying about graphics at all (though I'd rather get someone experienced (no offense)).
whitestazn88 wrote:i think its a step forward because it doesn't seem like there are so many attack points.
but at the same time, i still think they could be more accurately placed if you're gonna drop down to that few.
for example: the one in alaska is do-able because one can think that the bering strait is pretty shallow, land bridge, etc. same with the one in the new york harbor, and the mexico one is roughly placed where one could picture the rio grande.
but then what of the two africa ones? don't really make sense... move one to western europe instead of north africa in my opinion, and maybe move the one in se africa to the other coast? i think the tanzania or congo rivers flow out to that side.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Shouldn't S. America be worth +2? Each of it's territories is an attack point.
I think you should drop Antartica, shrink it down, and try and add some other territories. Who ever would attack Antartica in real world?
edbeard wrote:right now I'm not worrying about graphics at all.
MrBenn wrote:edbeard wrote:right now I'm not worrying about graphics at all.
Has anybody mentioned that these graphics suck? Get a decent draft up if you want to be taken seriously...
MrBenn wrote:On a slightly more serious note, have you put any thought into the 'golden' number of starting territories? I can't remember if 51 is considered golden or not?
edbeard wrote:I'll take your post as a 'I'm interested in doing your graphics' post so chop chop.
ok ok. I'll send you the psd to make it easier then chop chop.
MrBenn wrote:edbeard wrote:I'll take your post as a 'I'm interested in doing your graphics' post so chop chop.
ok ok. I'll send you the psd to make it easier then chop chop.
u nit wit
MrBenn wrote:You could add a territory into the Med??
Instead of using arrows, surely ports/docks would make sense? Is there any real-world rationale for picking the places you have?
The Neon Peon wrote:Split the map into way more territories, and this will have good gameplay. Just enlarge it, split it, and then some more. And after you think you are done, divide it up into even more territories.
MrBenn wrote:I'm surprised there isn't more discussion about this map...
Ed, give us some direction
Natewolfman wrote:you should turn the arrows into ports i think... when i see arrows i usually think passage way over mountains or over the river or something... but making them look like ports would seem more natural to this map i think
Users browsing this forum: No registered users