Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=358&t=59540
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:47 pmPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:33 amcaptainwalrus wrote:Are army circles realy neccesary? It seems that the center of the territories are light enough.
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:00 amThe new crowns look good cairns. They fit the color palette well. They blend in but are easily noticed as well. God job.cairnswk wrote:captainwalrus wrote:Are army circles realy neccesary? It seems that the center of the territories are light enough.
Wellno, they aren't necessary but could be an issue on Beirut and Cyprus, don't yo-u think.
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:52 amWidowMakers wrote:The new crowns look good cairns. They fit the color palette well. They blend in but are easily noticed as well. God job.cairnswk wrote:captainwalrus wrote:Are army circles realy neccesary? It seems that the center of the territories are light enough.
Wellno, they aren't necessary but could be an issue on Beirut and Cyprus, don't yo-u think.
As far as army circles go I think it is ok. You could move the crown on Cyprus a bit tot eh left and move the 88 left as well. Plus you could make the island a bit bigger (I don't think this map is going for actual sized accurate geography.
You could also do the same for Beirut. Make the sea border move left and widen the country a bit. Maybe?
WM
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:17 pm
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:43 amoaktown wrote:is it just me, or are the crowns way more bad-ass now?
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:45 amcairnswk wrote:oaktown wrote:is it just me, or are the crowns way more bad-ass now?
Jut a touch of royalty there with a purple disc behind them...only thing i was happy with.
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:17 pmPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 7:18 pmThe Neon Peon wrote:Crowns look a lot better now.
Would you mind enlarging your signature? It is very hard to read at the moment.
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:01 pm
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:23 pmZeakCytho wrote:That new butterfly is seriously badass
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:03 amPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:53 pmPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:34 pmPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:51 pmThe Neon Peon wrote:Italian Abyssina has the purple line that is at the edge of the territory near the red sea moved in slightly into the territory away from it's edge. Mostly visible on the large map, and only in a few places on the small one.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:55 pm
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:55 pmcairnswk wrote:The Neon Peon wrote:Italian Abyssina has the purple line that is at the edge of the territory near the red sea moved in slightly into the territory away from it's edge. Mostly visible on the large map, and only in a few places on the small one.
OK, i see that...are there any others you can see before i go posting an update.
the.killing.44 wrote:[nitpick]
It's not the same thing, but Trabzon's coastal border seems to be somewhat erased, or just skinnier than the others.
It wouldn't hurt to have the middle one of the Nile's delta (the one shaped like a Y within the bigger Y) connect to the overall Y better.
I'd like to see you add the line from Beirut to the tert on the large map. Without it it's, well,
[/nitpick]
This is looking great, cairns!
.44
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:04 pmPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:29 pmThe Neon Peon wrote:Woah... why is Europe worth 2? It is only 2 territories.
Secondly, Constantinople name needs to be moved closer to the territory, and the line connecting the name to the territory is missing on the large map.
Thirdly, Trabzon appears to be a different color from the rest of the continent, was this intentional?
Fourthly, there is a little tip of a black line showing in Adana (where the shoreline changes direction, the line to distinguish between the sea and land continues for a few pixels.
Fifthly, Kutais-Batum to Erzurum border has a little dark splotch.
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:29 pmPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:40 pmPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:48 pmsailorseal wrote:I love the idea, I am a HUGE WWII fan and this map is great. It is also good looking and historically accurate.
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:49 pmThe Neon Peon wrote:Woah... why is Europe worth 2? It is only 2 territories.
Secondly, Constantinople name needs to be moved closer to the territory, and the line connecting the name to the territory is missing on the large map.
Thirdly, Trabzon appears to be a different color from the rest of the continent, was this intentional?
Fourthly, there is a little tip of a black line showing in Adana (where the shoreline changes direction, the line to distinguish between the sea and land continues for a few pixels.
Fifthly, Kutais-Batum to Erzurum border has a little dark splotch.
The Neon Peon wrote:Crimea and Terek. Those two definitely look different in terms of the text.
Beiruit has no dark green near the borders, not sure if they is for visibility, or a mistake.
The line that connects Alexandria to the territory extends a different amount on the small and large maps.
Fixed.Yerevan name could be moved down a pixel or two.
Good. ThanksDon't see anything else.
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:36 pmThe Neon Peon wrote:Don't see anything else.
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:47 pmcairnswk wrote:sailorseal wrote:I love the idea, I am a HUGE WWII fan and this map is great. It is also good looking and historically accurate.
sailor...i don't mean to be rude...but i wouldn't want you in my army if you can't read....this is WW (1) One 1914 not WWII (two)...or did you just get it wrong.
Glad you like it though.
