Try Again wrote:you could change it to make it possible
and not use counties?
Moderator: Cartographers
Try Again wrote:you could change it to make it possible
lozzini wrote:Try Again wrote:you could change it to make it possible
and not use counties?
drake_259 wrote:erm shouldn't London be up there whatever the case, i mean its the UKs capital, its like taking Washington of the USA map
ZeakCytho wrote:drake_259 wrote:erm shouldn't London be up there whatever the case, i mean its the UKs capital, its like taking Washington of the USA map
You're aware that Washington is not on the USA map, right?
jonesthecurl wrote:How about a negative bonus for holding traditional rivals? EG if you hold Yorkshire + Lancs, you lose x per turn?
MrBenn wrote:OK, I'm still thinking about the gameplay is likely to work... At the moment I'm erring on the side of keeping it quite open.
Perhaps having bonuses for holding x number of Northern/Southern/Eastern/Western territories?
I'm tempted to abandon traditional territory deployment (ie get rid of the +1 army for every 3 terrs), and only have bonuses for holding specific groups of territories... Something like +2 for every three terrs in the same region, with an extra +2 for holding an entire region?
sailorseal wrote:Last time I was in England I took the train a lot. Maybe you could add some train stations and lines like in the NYC map...
Gilligan wrote:Looks good, very different gameplay.
Now - what if you have no 2 territories in the same region? Do you get 0, or like City Mogul get 1?
MrBenn wrote:While the values may seem a fraction high, bear in mind that the map is incredibly open...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users