Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=358&t=75548
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:24 pmyeti_c wrote:When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?
C.
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:44 pmMrBenn wrote:yeti_c wrote:When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?
C.
I know we worked out the territory mapping (ie old to new), and while I have every faith that WM has got it right, that's what I'm going to double-check later tonight...
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:49 pmMrBenn wrote:yeti_c wrote:When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?
C.
I know we worked out the territory mapping (ie old to new), and while I have every faith that WM has got it right, that's what I'm going to double-check later tonight...
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:11 pmLED ZEPPELINER wrote:there are a few places where the 888's are over the line, and they don't need to be: Gul, Luce, Zuto, Monroe, Karta is over the mountains, Iron Hills, Rotweed, and Una. I would move all of these just a few pixels so they are off the line.
What????yeti_c wrote:When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:18 pmWidowMakers wrote:What????yeti_c wrote:When writing the XML - did we ensure the new territories are in the same place (index wise) as the old territories?
WM
Old XML wrote:<name>a</name>
<name>b</name>
<name>c</name>
New XML wrote:<name>2</name>
<name>1</name>
<name>3</name>
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:44 pmPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:05 pm
That's cool. I like it, though the map should be bigger, I think. 
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:14 pmWidowMakers wrote:Well all I did was take the old XML and did a find/Replace for every territory. I think that will give the same index.
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:23 pmPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:47 amPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:02 pmPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:20 pmPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:22 pmPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:18 pmForza AZ wrote:XML is OK. Just 1 tiny name thing:
Doomfire Mountains on map is called Fire Mountains in XML
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:11 amForza AZ wrote:Centerscape XML has been checked and is OK!!!
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:01 amPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:04 amPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:05 pmMrBenn wrote:WidowMakers wrote:Well all I did was take the old XML and did a find/Replace for every territory. I think that will give the same index.
It should do - we're just trying to avoid a repeat of the temporary British Isles revamp glitch
MrBenn wrote:Here's my list, which contains the order I think the territories should be listed in the XML:
Having said that, a simple "Find and Replace" should work without any bother.
oaktown wrote:Forza AZ wrote:Centerscape XML has been checked and is OK!!!
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:10 pmPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:21 pmPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:19 pmPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:03 pmPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:12 pm.MrBenn wrote:Where's that monkey with the Quench Stamp?
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:29 pmThe name is changing because no one likes Centerscape and Midgard is more LOTR related than centerscape is now.hereje888 wrote:look, i like how the map looks, but i cant help wondering why the name changing...just a thought. i kinda liked the fact to be able to play in a lotr related map...
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:34 pmWidowMakers wrote:The name is changing because no one likes Centerscape and Midgard is more LOTR related than centerscape is now.hereje888 wrote:look, i like how the map looks, but i cant help wondering why the name changing...just a thought. i kinda liked the fact to be able to play in a lotr related map...
