Page 2 of 11

Re: Chicago-- Updated V2.1 [Pg 2]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:48 pm
by mibi
Tisha wrote:
mibi wrote:lake Mich is still flat and ugly. Throw a nice soothing gradient in there. The rest of the map is a texture bonanza, let the eye rest somewhere.

can you give an example? because there isn't much difference between flat and soothing and restful to me..


Here you are. When the entire map, while looking cool, but is entirely filled with art, textures, filters, etc, the eye needs some space to rest and to give the image some balance. Something like this does that for me.

Click image to enlarge.
image

Re: Chicago-- Updated V2.1 [Pg 2]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:47 pm
by whitestazn88
mibi wrote:
Tisha wrote:
mibi wrote:lake Mich is still flat and ugly. Throw a nice soothing gradient in there. The rest of the map is a texture bonanza, let the eye rest somewhere.

can you give an example? because there isn't much difference between flat and soothing and restful to me..


Here you are. When the entire map, while looking cool, but is entirely filled with art, textures, filters, etc, the eye needs some space to rest and to give the image some balance. Something like this does that for me.

Click image to enlarge.
image



word

Re: Chicago-- Updated V2.1 [Pg 2]

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:15 am
by azezzo
those train lines are not Metra lines, rather they belong to the CTA.
the Metra is a different entity and runs on different tracks, goes to different locations, pretty much a suburban train line that does come into chicago. The "el" is the elevated tracks for the cta

oh, and i liked the old trees, but realize you cant make every one happy. :D

Re: Chicago-- Updated V2.1 [Pg 2]

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:28 am
by Scott-Land
azezzo wrote:those train lines are not Metra lines, rather they belong to the CTA.
the Metra is a different entity and runs on different tracks, goes to different locations, pretty much a suburban train line that does come into chicago. The "el" is the elevated tracks for the cta

oh, and i liked the old trees, but realize you cant make every one happy. :D


CTA runs the rail lines in Chicago...... it's just elevated in the downtown area- no ? Called "L, El" as slang because it runs above the streets .?

Re: Chicago--

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:43 pm
by Scott-Land
Industrial Helix wrote:
The hole between norwood and dunning... what is that? Inconsequential, but just curious.


It's Norridge and Harwood Heights --- inside Chicago but technically not Chicago nor part of city limits.

*Mini- map still needs to be cleaned up. I just threw in the bonus colors for reference.
Changed texture of Lake Michigan and rail legend. Also Bonus colors.

Click image to enlarge.
image

Re: Chicago-- Updated 07/01 Version 3 [Pg 3]

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:12 am
by Risky_Stud
NIcely done Scott!

But where's Michael? :lol:

Re: Chicago-- Updated 07/01 Version 3 [Pg 3]

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:40 am
by Scott-Land
Risky_Stud wrote:NIcely done Scott!

But where's Michael? :lol:


Hehee-- prolly should've kept him. :D

Re: Chicago-- Updated V2.1 [Pg 2]

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:14 pm
by Wolffystyle
Scott-Land wrote:CTA runs the rail lines in Chicago...... it's just elevated in the downtown area- no ? Called "L, El" as slang because it runs above the streets .?

Uh, I don't think the Chicago Transit Authority runs Metra, and maybe if they do at some administrative level, most Chicagoans (myself included) consider the two to be separate systems.

Re: Chicago-- Updated 07/01 Version 3 [Pg 3]

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:36 pm
by Wolffystyle
Game Play comments:
    I am having a hard time initially seeing what borders what near the loop with the El tracks above the borders. Chance to make the Orange loop more realistic and a little wider so as to view the borders in the middle there?

    Same goes for the south side. What territory does the little area to east of lake calumet belong to? if it's south deering can you put the white circle right on the river there?

    Could there be a bonus for holding both airports? I'm not even sure if this is good advice. Probably not since each is already part of the El bonus. I answered my own question.

    Is norridge a territory?, there's no white circle. I don't even think it should be labeled. Screw all those who don't know its not part of chicago. The city label makes it more confusing than if it were simply unlabeled.

    Glad you took joliet out.

    Can Indiana be a territory that gives -1 troop? Just kidding, but not really, Indiana smells like shit.

Foundry Comments:
    Yea, that Metra train looks awesome, but, you don't have any metra lines on this map. Keep the el lines, they're much better, and I need the blue one to get to the loop.

    I assume back of the yards doesn't border near west side (my home) so you may want to cover the upper corner of back of the yards with more trees.

    You need to take that white line out to the east of norwood park above the river, that will help avoid confusion as to whether or not there is a territory up there.

Can I play this soon?

Wolffy

Re: Chicago-- Updated 07/01 Version 3 [Pg 3]

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:14 pm
by Risky_Stud
Scott-Land wrote:
Risky_Stud wrote:NIcely done Scott!

But where's Michael? :lol:


Hehee-- prolly should've kept him. :D


I was thinkin a shaded outine of him jumpin the train to the left.

Re: Chicago-- Updated 07/01 Version 3 [Pg 3]

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:16 pm
by Risky_Stud
i don't know where it is, but a small picture of soldier field would look kinda cool on the map it self.
just my opinion though. :D

Re: Chicago-- Updated V2.1 [Pg 2]

PostPosted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:28 am
by Scott-Land
Wolffystyle wrote:
Scott-Land wrote:CTA runs the rail lines in Chicago...... it's just elevated in the downtown area- no ? Called "L, El" as slang because it runs above the streets .?

Uh, I don't think the Chicago Transit Authority runs Metra, and maybe if they do at some administrative level, most Chicagoans (myself included) consider the two to be separate systems.


They are two different rail systems-- both run by CTA. Prolly where I got confused. I lived in North Loop for awhile and never took the rail out of the city. And I eat ketchup on my hot dog and order thin crust pizza.... :lol:

Wolffystyle wrote:Game Play comments:
    I am having a hard time initially seeing what borders what near the loop with the El tracks above the borders. Chance to make the Orange loop more realistic and a little wider so as to view the borders in the middle there?


I was going to have a small view window of the loop station without the rails. Something like a magnifying glass but no magnifying.

Wolffystyle wrote:Same goes for the south side. What territory does the little area to east of lake calumet belong to? if it's south deering can you put the white circle right on the river there?


The north side of the territory doesn't come into play as it has 2 impassables. I had outlined the lake that allowed to see the territory division better but someone posted earlier to remove it so I did.

Wolffystyle wrote:Is norridge a territory?, there's no white circle. I don't even think it should be labeled. Screw all those who don't know its not part of chicago. The city label makes it more confusing than if it were simply unlabeled.

Glad you took joliet out.


Again I had it unmarked then went back and labeled it. Totally agree that it's better without.

Wolffystyle wrote:Foundry Comments:
    Yea, that Metra train looks awesome, but, you don't have any metra lines on this map. Keep the el lines, they're much better, and I need the blue one to get to the loop.

    I assume back of the yards doesn't border near west side (my home) so you may want to cover the upper corner of back of the yards with more trees.


Can I play this soon?

Wolffy



Back of the Yards is not accessible from West Side. It's actually adjacent to Bridgeport but that was one of the terrs I decided not to use.

Thanks for all the feedback Wolffy--

Re: Chicago-- Updated 07/01 Version 3 [Pg 3]

PostPosted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:30 am
by Scott-Land
Risky_Stud wrote:
Scott-Land wrote:
Risky_Stud wrote:NIcely done Scott!

But where's Michael? :lol:


Hehee-- prolly should've kept him. :D


I was thinkin a shaded outine of him jumpin the train to the left.


Not sure if I can work it in... originally I had the mj logo shadowed on the Sear's Tower. Well I just found out I don't have a train for him to jump anymore. :lol:

Re: Chicago-- Updated 07/01 Version 3 [Pg 3]

PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:33 pm
by Scott-Land
Changed quite a bit because I had taken out the Metra train.

Click image to enlarge.
image

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:08 am
by Wolffystyle
Let me be the first to congratulate you on this new version of the map. Well done.

I also put ketchup on my hot dogs.

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:32 pm
by luxCRUSADER
I love the forest ! As an avid camper, the THREE tone trees is reflection of the author's ability to grab the viewers attention to beauty ... AMAZING JOB !!!!!
I love the rail connections, as it relates to gameplay balance !
I love the Chicago Imagery with the train, and the building- and its actually the building that compelled me to type today at your site- when I don't really have the time, cuz of the many errands in front of me; but like I said this a DAMN GOOD MAP from a gamers point of view ... the art compels me to stare !!! the Chicago map itself makes it easy to see the choke points.. and then I am left drooling over my keyboard demanding to start a game NOW !!! :evil:

I hope you'll be alright with the copyright to "Chicago Transit Authority"- looks like you'll be OK- as long as your not affiliated with it in any way ;)

What type of connection is that black and gray symbol between 'WEST PULLMAN' and 'SOUTH DEERING' ? I'm guessing its a bridge ?

And before I depart, I'm thinking you have already done this... but you might want to experiment with blending the opacity down as the eyes move from the main art work imagery of building and train as it approaches the map proper area ??? In either event that side is a little dark ... Quite Frankly, I don't know if that would improve things ... not sure...but what I am sure about is that this map is going all the way !!!!!!!!!

I CAN'T WAIT TO PLAY ON IT !!!

Good Job !- NO: ... GREAT JOB !!!!!!!! =D>

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:13 pm
by whitestazn88
write that the train stations attack adjacent train stations, otherwise the way its worded now is that you can attack any train station.

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:15 pm
by Night Strike
It seems like there is way too much deadspace on the map, especially for when you have to scale it down for the small map.

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:05 pm
by Scott-Land
luxCRUSADER wrote:I love the forest ! As an avid camper, the THREE tone trees is reflection of the author's ability to grab the viewers attention to beauty ... AMAZING JOB !!!!!
I love the rail connections, as it relates to gameplay balance !
I love the Chicago Imagery with the train, and the building- and its actually the building that compelled me to type today at your site- when I don't really have the time, cuz of the many errands in front of me; but like I said this a DAMN GOOD MAP from a gamers point of view ... the art compels me to stare !!! the Chicago map itself makes it easy to see the choke points.. and then I am left drooling over my keyboard demanding to start a game NOW !!! :evil:

I hope you'll be alright with the copyright to "Chicago Transit Authority"- looks like you'll be OK- as long as your not affiliated with it in any way ;)

What type of connection is that black and gray symbol between 'WEST PULLMAN' and 'SOUTH DEERING' ? I'm guessing its a bridge ?

And before I depart, I'm thinking you have already done this... but you might want to experiment with blending the opacity down as the eyes move from the main art work imagery of building and train as it approaches the map proper area ??? In either event that side is a little dark ... Quite Frankly, I don't know if that would improve things ... not sure...but what I am sure about is that this map is going all the way !!!!!!!!!

I CAN'T WAIT TO PLAY ON IT !!!

Good Job !- NO: ... GREAT JOB !!!!!!!! =D>


Wow thanks @!

whitestazn88 wrote:write that the train stations attack adjacent train stations, otherwise the way its worded now is that you can attack any train station.


Suppose I can-- but it should be clear that you can't hop over a terr to attack w/out it being bombardments.

Night Strike wrote:It seems like there is way too much deadspace on the map, especially for when you have to scale it down for the small map.


It's the shape of Chicago-- somewhat like Florida's pan handle. I've enlarged the current map to 110% taking the southern/northern borders to the edge. You don't gain much east/west at least nothing substantial and if anything, it looks as though parts of the map is missing. I prefer it the way it is over the other. Without distorting the map to make it larger east/west, I can't go any further north/south. I have about a 1/4 of inch I can shift to the left-- someone had mentioned that already.

As far as scaling it down to the small version, it won't create more or less space as it's relative and proportionate to the larger one- 800x840 to 600x630

If you have suggestions, I'd be more than happy to accommodate. It doesn't help me that you're saying there's dead space.... I've tried to fill the voids the best that I can.

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:23 am
by Risky_Stud
O.K., don't know why you had to change the background.
I liked the original better. It was brighter and fun to look at.
The new one is to dark and with the water also darker gives
it an all around strange feeling for me.

I do like the idea of the impassibles on a street sign though.
Maybe if you can find a way to combine them both or just make
the new one brighter to contrast with the water. And like i said
before with soldier field , if you can add something on the map itself
to give some flavor. even a small sear's tower or some other chicago
landmark would be cool.

But after all this is just my opinion and you should do what you feel
is best. Game play so far, i think looks just fine. Keep up the good work
buddy. Will be keepin an Eye on ya. :lol: :lol:

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:22 am
by Industrial Helix
I hate to say it, but I liked the old background better. I understand why you had to get rid of it, but the color in it and the the contrast with the dark tones of the map really made the image quite appealing. Surely there's a better image, I think.

The dotted line to the loop is a tad faint. I'd recommend a solid line.

Couldn't Roger's Park easily fit on its terr.?

Anyway, keep up the good work!

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:58 am
by laddida
Risky_Stud wrote:O.K., don't know why you had to change the background.
I liked the original better. It was brighter and fun to look at.
The new one is to dark and with the water also darker gives
it an all around strange feeling for me.



whats the matter we scared of the dark?

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:56 am
by Risky_Stud
laddida wrote:
Risky_Stud wrote:O.K., don't know why you had to change the background.
I liked the original better. It was brighter and fun to look at.
The new one is to dark and with the water also darker gives
it an all around strange feeling for me.



whats the matter we scared of the dark?


Nothin to do with being scared.
With everything around the map being dark,
it feels like it makes the map dark.
And i like to see what i'm attacking
and were i'm forting.

Re: Chicago-- [ NEW ] Version 4--Pg 3

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:16 pm
by Scott-Land
I'll tweak the lake to make it a bit brighter for the current version. Some say the Sears Tower on the old one takes away from the map and some prefer the less distracting one. Some prefer the old version, trees and some the new version. Maybe I should use a poll. lol--

I should say that I changed the graphics because I had the wrong train so went more towards the new l theme.

Re: Chicago-- Version 5 [Update Pg 4]

PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:03 am
by Scott-Land
--Adjusted map/bonus contrast and colors.
--Added Sears Tower.
--Centered map.
-- Small map 600x630

Even tho' the backdrop is dark, I adjusted the map itself to give it some contrast. This update was all you Risky... MJ didn't show up tho'.

Image
Click image to enlarge.
image