Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:oof! that would certainly make things a bit more interesting at the top of the leaderboard.... platinum xmap is def. one of the more difficult medals to obtain, imo. what's naruto got? silver?
Donelladan wrote:It's bad to make a rule against one player.
Also completely agree with ZaBeast argument, that doesn't prevent anything. It just means more preparation for the conqueror.
And I think 95% of the conqueror got there with a trick.
The other ones, even though they had way more maps played, they also got to the top by restricting the game they played.
It's the way of the scoreboard.
You can't be on the top playing all maps.
5800 points is extremely high, you have to be winning more than 80% of your games against brigadier. It's insane. No one can do that playing open everything.
Just change scoring system altogether if you don't want a conqueror farming a specific map,
SaviorShot wrote:I am not a fan of changing rules to get the Conquer knocked off ... that just looks shitty IMO. Just make the scoring system Flat Rate instead of Esc![]()
fishydance wrote:SaviorShot wrote:I am not a fan of changing rules to get the Conquer knocked off ... that just looks shitty IMO. Just make the scoring system Flat Rate instead of Esc![]()
I agree with that, but I think the fact that one person has held it for 5 years is an indication that the system needs to be overhauled. Something should be done. Not to knock off that one player, but to come up with a way to make it a better system going forward. Your idea for changing the scoring system to flat rate is interesting. However, would it promote even more farming because playing low ranks would yield as many points as playing a high rank player (but with less risk)?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users