Team wins for meeting map objective.

[Ignoreme]

[Delete Me]
PLACE THE NAME OF THE SUGGESTION IN THE SUBJECT LINE!

Things to remember when posting a new suggestion are that the dice are random, and that lots of analysis has been done on them both internally and public by community members. Also, please take time to search for previous similar suggestions and, if possible, to check current and archived threads before posting something "new". Delete the xxxxxxx, and substitute your text.

Any questions, contact one of the Suggestions Moderators.
[/Delete Me]


Concise description:

I tried to do a search and couldn't find anything. I WILL NOT search through over 5 thousands post to see if this is a repeat. I am way to lazy for that.
Anyway, when playing team games it seems if the map has a "map objective" to win, such as holding 4/5 cities or whatever. If you are playing a team game, if you and your team meet that objective you should win the game. As it stands now, I'm in a doubles game. As a team we have met the objective, but now I have to attack my partner for several rounds to take another city before we can win.
Has this ever been discussed? Sorry I'm so lazy, but I gotta be me.

Specifics/Details:

• xxxxxxx

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• xxxxxxx

[WingCmdr Ginkapo]

viewtopic.php?f=471&t=128133&p=2820478&hilit=team+objectives#p2820478

viewtopic.php?f=471&t=105466&p=2378989&hilit=team+objectives#p2378989

Seriously. That took two minutes

[Ignoreme]

I tried searching. Maybe used the wrong words to get to the subject. Another issue is declining membership. With answers like that, it's no wonder. Shove your two minutes bro : ) , and thanks?

[Ltrain]

Yea, try to ignore the "thread already made 5 years ago" police.

I've often thought of this in team games, but honestly it could create more trouble than it's worth. I could see a lot of people complaining because one team had a drop that made objective easy, especially in a trench game. You might say well this could happen just as easy in 1v1 games, but team games are *supposed* to be harder in my opinion. My thought on objective is it is the hardest way to win a game (as opposed to killing off everyone) and it should probably stay that way.

[WingCmdr Ginkapo]

I tried to do a search and couldn't find anything. I WILL NOT search through over 5 thousands post to see if this is a repeat. I am way to lazy for that.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=471&t=128133&p=2820478&hilit=team+objectives#p2820478

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... s#p2378989

Seriously. That took two minutes

Yea, try to ignore the "thread already made 5 years ago" police.

LTrain - Follow the discussion here. Mike says he couldnt be bothered to search. So I searched for him and posted the results. I made no requests as to what he did with that information. It is up to him if he wants to comment on the existing threads or not. All I did was provide the links.

If you continue to flame at every opportunity you will be punished by the mods.

[Ltrain]

LTrain - Follow the discussion here. Mike says he couldnt be bothered to search. So I searched for him and posted the results. I made no requests as to what he did with that information. It is up to him if he wants to comment on the existing threads or not. All I did was provide the links.

If you continue to flame at every opportunity you will be punished by the mods.

Mike clearly didn't appreciate your snide comment. I was just telling him to ignore it. A truly helpful person would've just said "here is the link" but you and the other "already been said!" police never do that. It always comes with a put down. always.

[owenshooter]

Mike clearly didn't appreciate your snide comment. I was just telling him to ignore it. A truly helpful person would've just said "here is the link" but you and the other "already been said!" police never do that. It always comes with a put down. always.

maybe mike should have you escort him through the forums so he isn't offended... and guess what, he was helped by a member, not a moderator, so i don't know what sort of "kid gloves" he expected... he continually does this in every forum he visits and he is given the same response, so why is this a shock to him? if he is too lazy to do a quick search, why should anyone care what he has to offer to a discussion that has possibly been going on for months already or longer? here, a user offered him the thread he was too busy to find, what he was to do with it, was up to him... it is really neat-o how you protect your lil' buddy here in the forums and his feelings... but maybe he needs to suck it up a bit... suck it up, cupcake!!! the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

p.s.-Wing, nothing will happen to him for his continued flames and death threats... last week proved that...

*cupcake song*