Conquer Club

• Allow polymorphic games that have 3 or more players.

• We already have polymorphic games with 2 players.
• We have team games with more than 2 teams.
• We should have polymorphic games with more than 2 players.

• This will benefit people who are not good at team games with more than 2 teams in order to let them practice more.
• This will benefit people who are good at team games with more than 2 teams, because they can have some better polymorphic competition against each other.
• This will let me run sweet tournaments (and presumably other TO's as well).

owenshooter wrote:suggested YEARS AGO and it was deemed too difficult to do. tell you what, send them the coding, so they can insert it and we'll get this option that you want. easy peasy... resolved... the black jesus has now dressed the duck for cooking...-Jésus noir

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:

owenshooter wrote:suggested YEARS AGO and it was deemed too difficult to do. tell you what, send them the coding, so they can insert it and we'll get this option that you want. easy peasy... resolved... the black jesus has now dressed the duck for cooking...-Jésus noir

chapcrap wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:

owenshooter wrote:suggested YEARS AGO and it was deemed too difficult to do. tell you what, send them the coding, so they can insert it and we'll get this option that you want. easy peasy... resolved... the black jesus has now dressed the duck for cooking...-Jésus noir

Fixed the quote code, so maybe that's enough?

If not, I guess my awesome suggestion could just be ignored because of lack of time/knowledge/caring/whatever. In summation, slamming a suggestion for being difficult to code while using incorrect code to quote Black Jesus seems lame. You seem lame.

chapcrap wrote:Thinking more about this and about this: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=218363

It almost seems as if a reclassification is needed for the game types.

Instead of Singles (standard, assassin, terminator, and polymorphic) and Teams (doubles, trips, quads, etc.), what it really should be is two new categories. The first is to define the team/turn structure: singles, doubles, triples, quadruples, and polymorphic. The second is the type of game: standard, assassin, terminator.

This is how it needs to happen.

TotoroHat wrote:Did this idea die?

chapcrap wrote:

chapcrap wrote:Thinking more about this and about this: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=218363

It almost seems as if a reclassification is needed for the game types.

Instead of Singles (standard, assassin, terminator, and polymorphic) and Teams (doubles, trips, quads, etc.), what it really should be is two new categories. The first is to define the team/turn structure: singles, doubles, triples, quadruples, and polymorphic. The second is the type of game: standard, assassin, terminator.

This is how it needs to happen.

TotoroHat wrote:Did this idea die?

I hope not!!