NEW RANKS Sugestions. [Poll Added]

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

Do you agree with the concept of 3 different Military Paths, each with its own rank?

Yes, although I think the old path should still be an option (4-Path)
32
12%
Yes, I agree fully with qwert's proposed 3-Path System
52
20%
Yes, I want new ranks, but not the 3-Path System
25
9%
Yes, I like the new ranks but not the graphics
25
9%
No, the ranks are fine as they are
132
50%
 
Total votes : 266

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby Chadwick31 on Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:17 am

The graphics aren't great, but that might be because they're blurred or something.

But I do like the idea of 1) adding in a few more ranks and 2) Making a couple of higher ranks.
Major Chadwick31
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:28 pm
Medals: 32
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby MrBenn on Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:08 am

I've had a play around with Qwert's new icons, and come up with something a tiny bit different (* indicates new rank name):
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant MrBenn
Retired Team Member
 
Posts: 7058
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty
Medals: 67
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2)
General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (1) Map Contribution (7) Tournament Contribution (2) General Contribution (15)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby MrBenn on Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:39 am

My 2 thoughts for possible rank scores are shown below:

Cook 1 1
Volunteer 600 600
Cadet 750 800
Private 900 1000
Private 1st Class 1000 1100
Lance Corporal 1100 1200
Corporal 1200 1300
Corporal 1st Class 1300 1400
Sergeant 1400 1500
Sergeant 1st Class 1500 1600
Sergeant Major 1600 1800
Warrant Officer 1800 2000
Lieutenant 2000 2200
Captain 2200 2400
Major 2400 2600
Lieutenant Colonel 2600 2800
Colonel 2800 3000
Brigadier 3000 3500
Major General 3500 4000
Lieutenant General 4000 4500
General 4500 5000
Field Marshal 5000 6000
User avatar
Lieutenant MrBenn
Retired Team Member
 
Posts: 7058
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty
Medals: 67
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2)
General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (1) Map Contribution (7) Tournament Contribution (2) General Contribution (15)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby yeti_c on Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:03 pm

I like these Numbers Benny.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Medals: 46
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
General Achievement (1) Map Contribution (13) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (10)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby lozzini on Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:15 pm

i think the black numbers are better than the blue numbers
Top Rank: Captain
Top Score: 1835
Top Pos: 1707
Nothing ventured... nothing gained
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class lozzini
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 10:46 am
Location: Closer than you may think
Medals: 28
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (1)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby InkL0sed on Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:04 pm

I think new ranks are the wrong way to go about this problem. Should we keep setting Field Marshall to some unattainable goal? I don't think so. I think the way things are right now is the ideal situation, as there are two field marshalls, two generals, and then the people with lower ranks starts to get larger and larger. Eventually, we will no longer be in an ideal situation (when there are too many field marshalls), which is why inflation itself needs to be combatted, but continuously setting the ranks higher is not the way to go.
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater
Medals: 23
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2)
Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby Qwert on Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:12 pm

by InkL0sed on Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:04 am

I think new ranks are the wrong way to go about this problem. Should we keep setting Field Marshall to some unattainable goal? I don't think so. I think the way things are right now is the ideal situation, as there are two field marshalls, two generals, and then the people with lower ranks starts to get larger and larger. Eventually, we will no longer be in an ideal situation (when there are too many field marshalls), which is why inflation itself needs to be combatted, but continuously setting the ranks higher is not the way to go.

Then what you propose,to assasin all MArshal,and generals(like assasin in wolfs lair ;)
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9175
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Medals: 77
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)
Training Achievement (2) Map Contribution (8) Tournament Contribution (22) General Contribution (4)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby hahaha3hahaha on Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:56 pm

.s.
Last edited by hahaha3hahaha on Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private 1st Class hahaha3hahaha
 
Posts: 721
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby MrBenn on Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:38 pm

InkL0sed wrote:I think new ranks are the wrong way to go about this problem. Should we keep setting Field Marshall to some unattainable goal? I don't think so. I think the way things are right now is the ideal situation, as there are two field marshalls, two generals, and then the people with lower ranks starts to get larger and larger. Eventually, we will no longer be in an ideal situation (when there are too many field marshalls), which is why inflation itself needs to be combatted, but continuously setting the ranks higher is not the way to go.

I agree that the goalposts shouldn't continually be moved to make the highest ranks unattainable.

While most people will be grateful for the recent increase in rank due to the restructure, I personally think that additional ranks could have been introduced to counter-balance the depreciation in value of ranks. As far as I can tell, CC would have liked to add some new ranks, but didn't have enough icons - which is the premise for this suggestion topic - and is why Qwert and I have both put some thoughts for new ranks on virtual paper.

The debate about where the score-line should be drawn for each rank has taken over this thread a little; but I think that additional/new ranks should be thought about and debated now, and I'm greatful to Qwert for starting this thread.
User avatar
Lieutenant MrBenn
Retired Team Member
 
Posts: 7058
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty
Medals: 67
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2)
General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (1) Map Contribution (7) Tournament Contribution (2) General Contribution (15)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby Qwert on Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:17 pm

InkL0sed wrote:
I think new ranks are the wrong way to go about this problem. Should we keep setting Field Marshall to some unattainable goal? I don't think so. I think the way things are right now is the ideal situation, as there are two field marshalls, two generals, and then the people with lower ranks starts to get larger and larger. Eventually, we will no longer be in an ideal situation (when there are too many field marshalls), which is why inflation itself needs to be combatted, but continuously setting the ranks higher is not the way to go.

These is sugestion forum,right. Aim open these topic,because i thinking that situation with ranks ,can solve with adding new ranks and new scoring,and its normal that some people agree and some people not agree.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9175
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Medals: 77
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)
Training Achievement (2) Map Contribution (8) Tournament Contribution (22) General Contribution (4)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby InkL0sed on Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:25 pm

qwert wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:
I think new ranks are the wrong way to go about this problem. Should we keep setting Field Marshall to some unattainable goal? I don't think so. I think the way things are right now is the ideal situation, as there are two field marshalls, two generals, and then the people with lower ranks starts to get larger and larger. Eventually, we will no longer be in an ideal situation (when there are too many field marshalls), which is why inflation itself needs to be combatted, but continuously setting the ranks higher is not the way to go.

These is sugestion forum,right. Aim open these topic,because i thinking that situation with ranks ,can solve with adding new ranks and new scoring,and its normal that some people agree and some people not agree.


Of course it's normal. I happen to disagree with you, that's all.

All I'm saying is what we really need is a way to control points inflation. Additional ranks would only be a minor nuisance at worst -- and that only for a short while.
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater
Medals: 23
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2)
Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby Shino Tenshi on Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:05 am

MrBenn wrote:My 2 thoughts for possible rank scores are shown below:

Cook 1 1
Volunteer 600 600
Cadet 750 800
Private 900 1000
Private 1st Class 1000 1100
Lance Corporal 1100 1200
Corporal 1200 1300
Corporal 1st Class 1300 1400
Sergeant 1400 1500
Sergeant 1st Class 1500 1600
Sergeant Major 1600 1800
Warrant Officer 1800 2000
Lieutenant 2000 2200
Captain 2200 2400
Major 2400 2600
Lieutenant Colonel 2600 2800
Colonel 2800 3000
Brigadier 3000 3500
Major General 3500 4000
Lieutenant General 4000 4500
General 4500 5000
Field Marshal 5000 6000


I like both of these spreads of numbers. I like the officer rankings starting around 1800-2000, though preferably 2000, and the field marshal rank being at 5000 is nice, as it is at least obtainable, if hard to do so.

Thanks to everyone who is putting a lot of time and effort into putting this proposal together.
User avatar
Captain Shino Tenshi
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:35 pm
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby Shino Tenshi on Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:08 am

MrBenn wrote:I've had a play around with Qwert's new icons, and come up with something a tiny bit different (* indicates new rank name):
Image


I like the idea of how these graphics progress. I am not sure how others would take to them, but they at least make progressive sense.
User avatar
Captain Shino Tenshi
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:35 pm
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby Qwert on Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:26 am

Of course it's normal. I happen to disagree with you, that's all.

All I'm saying is what we really need is a way to control points inflation. Additional ranks would only be a minor nuisance at worst -- and that only for a short while.

I also belive that Lack predict future,and not instal imediatly ranks,who can add,like Warant Officer,Lieutenant Colonel,Staff Sergeant,Specialist,Officer Candidate,and many more ranks,who can implement in CC.

like both of these spreads of numbers. I like the officer rankings starting around 1800-2000, though preferably 2000, and the field marshal rank being at 5000 is nice, as it is at least obtainable, if hard to do so.

Now you have 3 player over 4500 points,and very close to 5000,and i think that soon he will pass 5000pt,so these is no hard,and that why i thinking that 6000pt is good for Marshal.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9175
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Medals: 77
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)
Training Achievement (2) Map Contribution (8) Tournament Contribution (22) General Contribution (4)

Re: NEW RANKS-page 1

Postby Qwert on Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:43 pm

well aim experimen with new options.
Image
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9175
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Medals: 77
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)
Training Achievement (2) Map Contribution (8) Tournament Contribution (22) General Contribution (4)

PreviousNext

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Login