Re: CC Dispatch [Issue 30: 8-5-10] A Spankerific Issue!
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 11:32 am
i liked reading about you clapper
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=430&t=116940
clapper011 wrote:alex951 wrote:Damn I didn't know clappy was being interviewed.
was up for almost 2 weeks... well week and a half
reptile wrote:nice job on the conqueror's cup LC!
laughingcavalier wrote:reptile wrote:nice job on the conqueror's cup LC!
And since we are doing mutual congratulations, nothing like the super-high-quality job you did giving us such a great rundown on the whole league season.
laughingcavalier wrote:RE: chatglove, I gotta say it's a script I & a lot of other team players really like, and I can understand Foxy's disappointment reading the article... but iamkooler makes a good point. We're volunteers doing this & OK we make mistakes, but if the only tone we can write in is gushing admiration for everything that's done on CC, then this sure would be a boring newsletter to read.
laughingcavalier wrote:Now, back to the real subject everyone: Clapper!
iamkoolerthanu wrote:Before everyone starts criticizing Minister Masket's article, take a step back and think about it. Sure, the article wasnt the most informative, but it did show people that it exists, and if they click on the link provided, they will see all the options the add-on has to offer.
Sure, there were some sarcastic remarks, but I don't the the intent of those remarks were really to put down fox. They were probably just to make the article have a lighter tone to it, it wasn't to be mean.
And finally, if you don't like the article, go write one yourself! Masket put a lighter tone into an article that people apparently want to be all serious and hard facts. I understand where you are coming from, you want add-on articles to have correct facts and be serious and non-sarcastic..But that's not the way Masket wanted to write his article, and if you don't like his style of writing, you should go write your own article...
Sorry if my response seems angered or not entirely correct, but I just don't think its right when people criticize peoples writing, when it is completely volunteer run, and doesn't always have to follow a rigid, factual based structure..
I'm probably gonna get yelled at by some members now, but I said what I wanted to say
Bruceswar wrote:I just gotta say that KORT lead most of the way in CLA Season 2, with IA taking over at the end. Just a minor mistake. Cool Newsletter.
Bruceswar wrote:I just gotta say that KORT lead most of the way in CLA Season 2, with IA taking over at the end. Just a minor mistake. Cool Newsletter.
Foxglove wrote:Also, thanks to everyone who has written in defense of the utility of the chatglove and the chatsniffer - I'm glad it has an appreciative audience, however small.
jbrettlip wrote: jsut because we are cooler and sexier than the lot of you combined
Denise wrote:It's been said, but not by me. I love chatglove! No more scrolling up and down 15 times to type "Ghajnsielem" or "Birzebbugia" in Malta. And, as has been said, chat sniffer is wonderful for team games. Thanks, Foxxy!)
nagerous wrote:Thanks for all the responses regarding the aforementioned article in this edition of the newsletter. I have already let Foxglove know but just to inform the rest of our readers in the next edition, I am going to be doing a re-review of the application, hopefully you all will find it fairer.
nagerous wrote:Thanks for all the responses regarding the aforementioned article in this edition of the newsletter. I have already let Foxglove know but just to inform the rest of our readers in the next edition, I am going to be doing a re-review of the application, hopefully you all will find it fairer.
icedagger wrote:Good to see MM puts as much thoughtful planning and rigorous attention to detail into his reviews as his mafia games