Moderator: Clan Directors
angola wrote:I like the idea of net-win rate, though I think there should be a minimum number of games played to qualify as well.
Of course, minimum number of games played would also make 3-1 type records moot, but net-win rate is still better than winning percentage I think.
Leehar wrote:How was it determined last season? Isn't that a good baseline?
lord voldemort wrote:i see some holes...
some of the best doubles players wont play trips and quads...eg mikidios and superrag (bpb)
while i haevnt looked at there's or anyone elses numbers...what if they went 15-0 or something ridic like that...yet they dont qualify for allstar selection...even though everyone woudl agree those kind of results are worthy of a spot.
I
jpcloet wrote:Leehar wrote:How was it determined last season? Isn't that a good baseline?
Last Season we ran the script and the top player award went to someone with a really high win% and also across all team types (DTQ)
viewtopic.php?f=442&t=93536
However, the all-stars were chosen by position, so if you were really good at doubles, then you had a spot.
The baseline was really high though. Something like min games of 10 along with a win rate of about 75-80% on your spot plus 70% or higher on the other team games. I think almost all the quads players last season were undefeated.
jpcloet wrote:Cachejob20-1
Rodion wrote:jpcloet wrote:Cachejob20-1
Makes me wonder: if someone manages to go undefeated in 2 kinds of games (say, trips and quads), who gets to pick whether he goes to the all star team as a triples or quads player?
Rodion wrote:Are those games only quads?
1st - dwilhelmi - 93,33% wins
2nd - Shatners Bassoon - 92,85% wins
3rd - Denise - 91,66% wins
T-4th - cachejob - 88,23% wins
T-4th - Chuuuuck - 88,23% wins
5th - Chariot of Fire - 86,95% wins
Chuuuuck wrote:This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
Chariot of Fire - 20-3
Chuuuuuck - 15-2
Denise - 11-1
dwilhelmi - 14-1
cachejob - 15-2
Shatners Bassoon - 13-1
Who do you all think is more deserving? I am honestly kind of unsure, I can see arguments for both.
jpcloet wrote:One of the considerations in Season 1 was the amount of road games, there were certainly a number of strong players who only played on their favourite maps only in that season. This season seems to be a better mix.
Lubawski wrote:jpcloet wrote:One of the considerations in Season 1 was the amount of road games, there were certainly a number of strong players who only played on their favourite maps only in that season. This season seems to be a better mix.
I think that's a great way to look at it.
jakewilliams wrote:Chuuuuck wrote:This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
Chariot of Fire - 20-3
Chuuuuuck - 15-2
Denise - 11-1
dwilhelmi - 14-1
cachejob - 15-2
Shatners Bassoon - 13-1
Who do you all think is more deserving? I am honestly kind of unsure, I can see arguments for both.
Easy
1. CoF
2. SB
3. cache
Denise wrote:jakewilliams wrote:Chuuuuck wrote:This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
Chariot of Fire - 20-3
Chuuuuuck - 15-2
Denise - 11-1
dwilhelmi - 14-1
cachejob - 15-2
Shatners Bassoon - 13-1
Who do you all think is more deserving? I am honestly kind of unsure, I can see arguments for both.
Easy
1. CoF
2. SB
3. cache
Lubawski wrote:Denise wrote:jakewilliams wrote:Chuuuuck wrote:This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
Chariot of Fire - 20-3
Chuuuuuck - 15-2
Denise - 11-1
dwilhelmi - 14-1
cachejob - 15-2
Shatners Bassoon - 13-1
Who do you all think is more deserving? I am honestly kind of unsure, I can see arguments for both.
Easy
1. CoF
2. SB
3. cache
Don't be upset. Jake's dyslexia is just acting up again. He put his bottom 3 up there by mistake.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users