Page 1 of 1

[ACC2] Headless Horsemen 16 v Grim Reapers 43 - Final 10/20

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 1:57 am
by Keefie
The All Comers Cup II

HH Contact: Keefie
GR Contact: xman5151

RULES: See competition thread. No additional terms have been requested by either team.

Points Score

Headless Horsemen 16 - Grim Reapers 43


show: Singles Set

show: HH Home Set


show: Deciding Game


show: GR Home Set


show: Player Count

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:10 am
by xman5151
Agreed. Good luck HH!

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:59 am
by Keefie
Games created and underway, thread updated. Have a great war Reapers.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:54 am
by Teflon Kris
FOW Violations by GR - no points available for GR in these games (should they win any):



FOW Violation by HH - no points available for HH in this game (should they win it):

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:44 am
by kmhebert
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=11613998

We got fucked here guys. We don't usually play FOW rule because it's for gaping pussies. Can we please modify the war rules to eliminate this stupid requirement?

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:39 pm
by xman5151
DJ Teflon wrote:FOW Violations by GR - no points available for GR in these games (should they win any):



FOW Violation by HH - no points available for HH in this game (should they win it):



Game 11613998 isn't even a fog of war game.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:09 pm
by kmhebert
:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:11 pm
by kmhebert
xman5151 wrote:

Game 11613998 isn't even a fog of war game.


What a bunch of bullshit. Makes me want to take my ball and go home, fuсk your All Comers Cup DJ Teflon.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:35 am
by misher
We both have one FOW violation why don't we call it even and throw the FOW violation rule out.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:03 am
by Teflon Kris
CORRECTION

FOW Violations by GR - no points available for GR in these games (should they win any):



FOW Violation by HH - no points available for HH in this game (should they win it):



Game 11613998 was incorrectly listed above - no violation took place as this was not an FOW game - apologies for this, I should have checked, although I didn't expect toreceive such a spurious report.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:25 am
by Keefie
misher wrote:We both have one FOW violation why don't we call it even and throw the FOW violation rule out.


FoW Rule is the default for this competition. Both teams have committed one violation so everything is even and as only the singles are left there's not much point in changing things. FYI, your CL and I could have agreed not to play with this rule, but neither of us requested it, so it stayed in.

Kmhebert, don't take it out on DJ Teflon, he organises this for free, we're lucky to have guys like him around.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen v Grim Reapers

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:46 am
by xman5151
Keefie wrote:
misher wrote:We both have one FOW violation why don't we call it even and throw the FOW violation rule out.


FoW Rule is the default for this competition. Both teams have committed one violation so everything is even and as only the singles are left there's not much point in changing things. FYI, your CL and I could have agreed not to play with this rule, but neither of us requested it, so it stayed in.

Kmhebert, don't take it out on DJ Teflon, he organises this for free, we're lucky to have guys like him around.



Agree with everything Keefie, we could've/should've taken it out but didn't, so we have to live with it. Thanks for fixing that DJ.

I don't know who filed the report if someone did, I assumed we would call it even and let the games go, but that's alright - let's get back to focusing on the games and having a fun war :)

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen 4pts v Grim Reapers 10pts

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:16 pm
by xman5151
Fyi - the in the Pearl Harbor game the FOW violation was overturned as it wasn't a fog of war game

ACC2 - HH v GR 1v 1 Games

PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:11 pm
by Teflon Kris
Apologies for the delay folks

Series 1
Free Syrian Army v Tiller

Imperium Romanum - No Spoils, Adjacent, Fog
WWII Iwo Jima. NS, chained, fog. (no trench)

Series 2
calculatedCHA0S v xman5151

Imperium Romanium. Nuclear, chained, Trench Fog-
Conquer Rome - No Spoils, Chained, Fog

Series 3
Keefie v kmhebert

Stalingrad - No Spoils, Chained, Sunny
Stalingrad. NS, chained, fog. (no trench)

Series 4
join cad v akabob2

Arms Race - No Spoils, Chained, Fog
Poker Club. NS, chained, fog. (no trench)

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen 7pts v Grim Reapers 21pts

PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:11 am
by whakamole
also lame: the FoW violation on Game 11611416 is crap because I didnt even do anything on my first turn, thereby the view they got after my turn wasn't one iota different from what it was at the start of the game.

i know i'm pissing and moaning but if there's no territories taken in the first play, FoW "violations" should be thrown out.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen 7pts v Grim Reapers 21pts

PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:27 pm
by Keefie
I totally agree with you, I will change the score

This can only benefit the Reapers so I doubt xman5151 will contradict me.

ALL FOG VIOLATIONS WILL BE ANNULLED.

Silly rule anyway.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen 16 v Grim Reapers 43 - Final 10

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:35 am
by chemefreak
Pending.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen 16 v Grim Reapers 43 - Final 10

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:36 am
by chemefreak
Moved to completed. Privs removed. Dropbox updated. Medals issued.

Re: [ACC2] Headless Horsemen 16 v Grim Reapers 43 - Final 10

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:55 am
by unionman
Nice job everyone!