Page 1 of 3

[CC4] ACE (40) vs. LOW (21) - Final 1/27

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:15 am
by angola
CONTACTS

Agents of the Chaotic Empire
angola
jetsetwilly

Legends of War
Crazyirishman

show: Clan war


show: Settings


show: Extra Rules


show: Exchange dates


GAMES
Batch 1
show: ACE home games


show: LOW home games


Batch 2
show: ACE home games


show: LOW home games


Batch 3
show: ACE home games


show: LOW home games


PLAYER COUNT
show: ACE


show: LOW

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:19 am
by benga
this will be interesting, 2 clans on the raise

HF

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 4:48 am
by Crazyirishman
LOW agrees to the terms listed above. This is going to be a great match

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:31 am
by maasman
Who's excited?

I'm excited 8-)

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:14 pm
by hyposquasher
I'm excited and I have two thumbs! I think I said that wrong...

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:34 pm
by IcePack
This should be a fun one to watch!!!

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 3:59 pm
by angola
Set 1 games have been exchanged.

Happy hunting.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:57 pm
by jj3044
GL LOW!

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 10:22 pm
by Crazyirishman
Good Luck ACE.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:47 am
by Swimmerdude99
Good luck to the lowest of the LOW.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 11:43 am
by hyposquasher
swimmerdude99 wrote:Good luck to the lowest of the LOW.


Ha! You got 'em good, buddy.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 12:44 pm
by Crazyirishman
hyposquasher wrote:
swimmerdude99 wrote:Good luck to the lowest of the LOW.


Ha! You got 'em good, buddy.


I've personally always wondered how other people pronounce our clan tag, since it can go either way on preference.
There's the option of pronouncing it like LOW and in toe, moe, doe, etc. and then you could pronounce in LOW as in wow, cow, or how.

nevertheless, I'm not clever enough to think of a way to use ACE in a sentence to get a laugh out of anybody.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:36 pm
by Leehar
I use the latter low
(as in cow :))

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:55 am
by angola
Leehar wrote:I use the latter low
(as in cow :))


Really? Definitely LOW TOE.

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

PostPosted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:26 am
by hyposquasher
LOW TOE here too.

This is a quiet thread!

Good war so far. We have a lead in the score but it seems like things are pretty even so far in reality.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

PostPosted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:49 am
by Genoke
Crazyirishman wrote:nevertheless, I'm not clever enough to think of a way to use ACE in a sentence to get a laugh out of anybody.

ACE in dutch = AAS, but when you speak it out, it sounds almost like Arse but without the R....
closest i can get....

Good letters chosen there!

this will be a very close war i guess, even with the slight point advantage of ACE, i think both clans will have their hands full to get a win out of it!

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

PostPosted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 12:24 pm
by Crazyirishman
hyposquasher wrote:This is a quiet thread!

Good war so far. We have a lead in the score but it seems like things are pretty even so far in reality.


We're currently employing the "dig ourselves a hole" strategy so we can remain focused for the other two batches. ;)

And in terms of a quiet thread, we're kinda forum boring. There's only a handful of us the post in the public forums regularly, so it'd be tough for us to live up to a KORT-TOFU thread Maybe to spice things up I can file a C&A report against a few of you or you do the vice-versa for us? That'll get some posts directed this way.

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

PostPosted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 12:28 pm
by hyposquasher
Crazyirishman wrote:
hyposquasher wrote:This is a quiet thread!

Good war so far. We have a lead in the score but it seems like things are pretty even so far in reality.


We're currently employing the "dig ourselves a hole" strategy so we can remain focused for the other two batches. ;)

And in terms of a quiet thread, we're kinda forum boring. There's only a handful of us the post in the public forums regularly, so it'd be tough for us to live up to a KORT-TOFU thread Maybe to spice things up I can file a C&A report against a few of you or you do the vice-versa for us? That'll get some posts directed this way.


It's safe to say we're pretty much the same way. I like your idea of C&A reports. I'm going to file one right now to say that you guys have been working together in private messages instead of in public chat.

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:32 am
by Crazyirishman
hyposquasher wrote:I'm going to file one right now to say that you guys have been working together in private messages instead of in public chat.


whoa whoa whoa!! Since when are we allowed to use gamechat to communicate. I thought we had agreed in the pre-war talks that the only acceptable form of team communication was through nude selfies? If you guys have been using game chat the whole time, I demand that all games be remade you fucking cheaters!

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:51 am
by LEQUEEN
I agree. Ace talk too much. I think 5 of their wins should turn to lose as penalty. Or even better ace should divide in 2 clans :o 1 can keep the "ac" and the othe the "e" lol

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:23 am
by hyposquasher
LEQUEEN wrote:I agree. Ace talk too much. I think 5 of their wins should turn to lose as penalty. Or even better ace should divide in 2 clans :o 1 can keep the "ac" and the othe the "e" lol


Something like one called AoC and the other called Emp?

And btw, what do our nude selfies have to do with CC?

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:21 pm
by Foxglove
Crazyirishman wrote:
hyposquasher wrote:This is a quiet thread!

Good war so far. We have a lead in the score but it seems like things are pretty even so far in reality.


We're currently employing the "dig ourselves a hole" strategy so we can remain focused for the other two batches. ;)

And in terms of a quiet thread, we're kinda forum boring. There's only a handful of us the post in the public forums regularly, so it'd be tough for us to live up to a KORT-TOFU thread Maybe to spice things up I can file a C&A report against a few of you or you do the vice-versa for us? That'll get some posts directed this way.


If you need any tips on how to craft some clever yet cutting remarks or how to spin yourselves up in a nexus of outrage and ill-will, just shoot me a PM and I'll offer you some maybe free, maybe not advice!

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

PostPosted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:42 pm
by jj3044
hyposquasher wrote:
LEQUEEN wrote:I agree. Ace talk too much. I think 5 of their wins should turn to lose as penalty. Or even better ace should divide in 2 clans :o 1 can keep the "ac" and the othe the "e" lol


Something like one called AoC and the other called Emp?

And btw, what do our nude selfies have to do with CC?

What would happen to poor Parkon? We would have to cut the poor bastard in half... :shock:

Re: [CC4] ACE (7) vs. LOW (2) - set 1

PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:11 am
by LEQUEEN
Well ... Its your idea ... But i have to say that ... I love it!!! Lol. Maybe this way he can stop being best in spain and be 2 middle table players. All i can say for him is "sit happends" ;)

Re: [CC4] ACE (7) vs. LOW (2) - set 1

PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:55 pm
by PaRKoN
I am fine with that as far as it comes with double of everything (troops, luck...)