Conquer Club

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:16 am**

Games Summary

========================================================================

Score The Bullet-proof Bandits 15 - 28 The New Crusade

Tiebreaker - TBD

1st round BpB Home Games

show

1st round TNC Home Games

show

2nd round BpB Home Games

show

2nd round TNC Home Games

show

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:16 am**

The terms

Negotiated terms for this war as follows:

========================================================================

The Bullet-proof Bandits vs The New Crusade
BpB Contact: Fruitcake
2nd BpB Contact: TBA
TNC Contact: MoB Deadly
2nd TNC Contact: Epitaph1

Start: 6th/ February/2014
Thread: run by Bullet-proof Bandits
Games: 44 games, each worth 1 point. Additional one game decider on random map.
War split in 4 equal rounds of 11 & 1 game decider
Game split for each round as follows:
3 Quads, 3 Triples, 3 Doubles, 2 Polymorphic
tie-breaker: Random triples
Max game count per player: 12 games (except for decider where a 13th game may be played)

Rules of Engagement:
- There will be no freestyle, unlimited forts, no forts, parachute forts, speed, manual deployments, Trench, nukes or beta maps.
- No Doodle Earth / Luxembourg / Eurasia Mini
- Fog Courtesy is in effect, the rule does not apply to conquest maps or where the starting team just deploys/forts without attacks. In the event that it is broken, team that has broken the rule must reveal the move

========================================================================

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:17 am**

Sorry guys but the tiebreaker is mandatory not optional. Please amend the terms.

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:14 am**

TNC by a mile. They are on a totally different level.

-griff

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:37 am**

grifftron wrote:TNC are on a totally different level.

-griff

fair comment

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:41 am**

Fruitcake wrote:
grifftron wrote:TNC are on a totally different level.

-griff

fair comment

Posted: **Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:33 pm**

TNC agrees, looking forward to this war!

Posted: **Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:18 pm**

WhoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOo

Posted: **Tue Feb 04, 2014 2:29 am**

Good to see the band back together. I think this will be Bandits in a rout.

Posted: **Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:04 pm**

Alright ... Bulletproof Bandits?

*looks through archieves*

MooooooB! You said they were famous! I'm leaving the country!

Posted: **Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:40 pm**

grifftron wrote:TNC by a mile. They are on a totally different level.

-griff

We haven't played a long while but we have showed durability, in the fact that despite not playing any battles in a long time, we have still got a strong core membership who check into CC for sub-forum banter and laughs, often at my expense due to past antics with the sleepless shepherds delight.

Posted: **Mon Feb 10, 2014 6:21 pm**

Ragian wrote:Alright ... Bulletproof Bandits?

*looks through archieves*

MooooooB! You said they were famous! I'm leaving the country!

ALMOST... the proper word is ALMOST... the black jesus is amused...-el Jesus negro

Posted: **Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:36 am**

owenshooter wrote:
Ragian wrote:Alright ... Bulletproof Bandits?

*looks through archieves*

MooooooB! You said they were famous! I'm leaving the country!

ALMOST... the proper word is ALMOST... the black jesus is amused...-el Jesus negro

al·most
ôlˈmōst,ˈôlˌmōst/
adverb

1. not quite; very nearly.
"he almost knocked Robin over"
synonyms: nearly, (just) about, more or less, practically, virtually, all but, as good as, close to, near, not quite, roughly, not far from, for all intents and purposes; approaching, bordering on, verging on

Posted: **Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:16 pm**

Will it be the 1st war ever, with poly included?
Nice to see you guys back to the arena

GL all

Posted: **Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:40 pm**

Armandolas wrote:Will it be the 1st war ever, with poly included?
Nice to see you guys back to the arena
GL all

Close,

TNC vs RET did it first haha. TNC never shys away from obscure clan war formats. We like experimenting and trying fun formats

viewtopic.php?f=441&t=199746

therealdeal_37 wrote:History has been made. First ever Poly games sent out as part of a CC Clan War. (According to cheme)

Scores and threads updated.

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 7:46 am**

question... with the violation of the fog rule, is this going to be the first ever "surrender" victory in clan war history? another BpB first!!! i don't care if disciplinary action was taken, i mean, what could that even entail?!! give us the victory and i'm sure we'll finish out the games since we are such good sportsman... the black jesus has spoken..-el Jesus negro

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 8:07 am**

owenshooter wrote:i don't care if disciplinary action was taken, i mean, what could that even entail?!!

I like to think it was spanking.

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 8:17 am**

do i get a medal or a conquer coin for this first ever Clan War Surrender? do we have to file a petition for this or do the clan war guys just step in and declare it? the black jesus is puzzled...-el Jesus negro

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:11 am**

*****

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:52 am**

Sorry BPB about that Fog Violation. That is out of character, and that is why we put it in the Game Label for an extra reminder.

We revealed the move as quickly as we possibly could, but not before the damage was done.

RET did this in our active war against them so we know how it feels. Hopefully it was not too detrimental to that particular game.

Let me know when you are able to make your home maps so we can get the rest of the first round underway!

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:17 am**

owenshooter wrote:do i get a medal or a conquer coin for this first ever Clan War Surrender? do we have to file a petition for this or do the clan war guys just step in and declare it? the black jesus is puzzled...-el Jesus negro

Fruitcake wrote:- Fog Courtesy is in effect, the rule does not apply to conquest maps or where the starting team just deploys/forts without attacks. In the event that it is broken, team that has broken the rule must reveal the move

Owen, despite the fact that per your clans posted terms we have satisfied the conditions for dazza being a idiot (not the first time) and breaking the fog rule, I have made you an award because you deserve it.

I've also made an award for dazza.

Rewards are nonrefundable. Rewards may not be returned or exchanged. Each reward has a cash value of 1/100th of one cent. cooldeals is not liable for any emotional, physical or psychological damage that may or may not originate from these awards or lack thereof.

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:48 am**

So no spanking?

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:57 am**

thegreekdog wrote:So no spanking?

dazza likes spanking. Fortunately we have a torture chamber back at headquarters. We'll first put him on the racks. Then we'll make him watch nonstop Manchester United wins on TV. Finally, we will lock him up in seclusion with only BGtheBrain for company.

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:12 pm**

If BG only does this...

BGtheBrain wrote::eyeroll:

Posted: **Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:28 pm**

BPB also joined the game long after TNC had already joined. Not sure why a snap was not taken upon joining. That would have avoided the issue as well.

That rule was specifically made for when teams would delay joining games to get have a chance for a foggy first go.

Conquer Club

BpB -v- TNC (16-29) - Final 5/16

BpB -v- TNC (16-29) - Final 5/16

Re: BpB -v- TNC

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)

Re: BpB -v- TNC (begins 6th Feb 2014)