Conquer Club

[1v1] LHDD vs FAD (26-15) LHDD Win FINAL

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[1v1] LHDD vs FAD (26-15) LHDD Win FINAL

Postby Mad777 on Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:39 pm

4th 1vs1 Clan Event, Round 1

Contacts:
LHDD: Mad777
FAD: bergy1

41 sets of Best of 5

Rules :arrow: click link above.

add'on: 12hr FoW apply to this war.

Player usage LHDD: Mad777 (2), Donelladan (2), sempaispellcheck (4), fairman (1), QuikSilver (3), arno30 (3), donche64 (2), samdemars (3), dragon dor (3), Mc Lor (4), djelebert (3), ancessus (3), blonderic (1), Cascades (1), Overdsky (2), rrrowm (2), betiko (1).

Player usage FAD: Razorvich (4), PepeAtila (2), far2ezee (3), dorsettrob (4), Wile E Coyote (1), Enormastitz (3), saintagnes (3), bergy1 (4), Gabriel13 (4), Metricsystemlove (4), Barum Boy (4), Guderian09 (2).

LHDD HOME
show: 16-4 COMPLETED


Map usage LHDD HOME (2 max): Baseball (1), King's Court (1), Three Kingdoms Of Korea (1), World Cup 2011 (1), New World (1), AoR2 (1), Battle for Iraq (1), Classic Cities: Pot Mosbi (1), Feudal Epic (2), Feudal War (2), Napoleonic Europe (1), Cricket (2), Third Crusade (1), 2014 World Cup (1), Crossword (1), Conquer Rome (2), Classic (1)/Tie Break.

Tie Break COMPLETED
QuikSilver vs saintagnes (Classic: Automatic, Sequential, No Spoils, Chained, Sunny, No Trench).
  1. Game 15604732 LHDD
  2. Game 15604734 FAD
  3. Game 15604735 LHDD
  4. Game 15604736 FAD
  5. Game 15604737 FAD

FAD HOME
show: 10-10 COMPLETED

Map usage FAD HOME (2 max): Baseball (1), Feudal War (1), Baltic Crusades (1), Berlin 1961 (1), Jamaica (1), City Mogul (1), Clandemonium (1), Peloponnesian War (1), Das Schloss (1), Iberia (1), AoR2 (1), USA West (1), New World (1), Bamboo Jack (1), Waterloo (1), 1982 (1), Euarsia (1), England (1), Rail Europe (1), Arms Race (1), Classic (1)/Tie Break.
Last edited by Mad777 on Sat May 23, 2015 10:28 am, edited 61 times in total.
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby bergy1 on Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:55 am

FAD agrees
Image
User avatar
Colonel bergy1
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:14 pm
Location: Bristol UK

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Mad777 on Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:15 am

Awaiting privileges...
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Razorvich on Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:44 am

Good to see you again LHDD :D
High Score: 2569
Image
TeeGee has my PW... Wall him if I get below 1 Hour in CLAN GAMES ONLY !!
User avatar
Captain Razorvich
Head Chatter
Head Chatter
 
Posts: 4769
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:28 am
Location: I'm lost........no Idea where I am....

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Mad777 on Thu Apr 23, 2015 9:11 am

Razorvich wrote:Good to see you again LHDD :D


Can't wait to fight :twisted:

Sounds like a fun war 8-)

Good luck (not too many...) to you FAD!
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Donelladan on Fri Apr 24, 2015 6:01 pm

Good luck FAD, it will be a pleasure to face you.
Image
User avatar
Brigadier Donelladan
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
4521739

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Mad777 on Fri Apr 24, 2015 7:16 pm

LHDD Home game posted, awaiting opponent player names to create Home set games.
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby QuikSilver on Sat Apr 25, 2015 8:56 am

Razorvich wrote:Good to see you again LHDD :D


Glad to see you again with a clan that fits more your need :)

Have fun!
LHDD: New Comers 4, CL6 - Second division & Random Cup winners!
Image
User avatar
Major QuikSilver
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:26 pm
Location: Québec

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Mad777 on Sun Apr 26, 2015 1:51 pm

All Round 1 games are now created, all players were invited also.

Wish you all good luck!
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Mad777 on Mon Apr 27, 2015 6:40 am

dorsettrob violated the fog of war rule in 2 games:
Game 15585128 & Game 15585130.
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby bergy1 on Mon Apr 27, 2015 11:31 am

So did rrrowm in mine btw - but only by a couple of hours and I had snaps - more relevant than an AOR2 game that isn't 12 hours btw

Also my Feudal epic is not a 12 hour rule game hence I ignored the 12 hour rule posted

What was Dorests 2nd line up?
Image
User avatar
Colonel bergy1
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:14 pm
Location: Bristol UK

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Mad777 on Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:26 pm

bergy1 wrote:So did rrrowm in mine btw - but only by a couple of hours and I had snaps - more relevant than an AOR2 game that isn't 12 hours btw

Also my Feudal epic is not a 12 hour rule game hence I ignored the 12 hour rule posted

What was Dorests 2nd line up?


He did posted the move in the game chat...but still need to know what was the territs was visible from what he took, if this doesn't get resolve both game to be redone.
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 1 - FAD 0)

Postby Mad777 on Tue Apr 28, 2015 7:43 am

First blood for LHDD ;)
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 4 - FAD 1)

Postby Mad777 on Wed Apr 29, 2015 8:02 am

Score updated...5 out 20 sets completed.
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 5 - FAD 2)

Postby Mad777 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:35 am

7 sets are now completed...still questions about FoW rules violations with dorsettrob and fairman games...ended up with 3-2 in favor of FAD.
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 5 - FAD 2)

Postby bergy1 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:43 am

For me Dorsettrob gave the lines of the moves prior to the opponents first move - given the level of overall sight they had it seems a bit picky going on about that again in a WC match - also since you posted fog Rule statements on games not requiring it which was confusing.
I really would expect a high ranked team to be a bit less sensitive to this especially so far ahead already.
Image
User avatar
Colonel bergy1
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:14 pm
Location: Bristol UK

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 5 - FAD 2)

Postby betiko on Thu Apr 30, 2015 12:11 pm

bergy1 wrote:For me Dorsettrob gave the lines of the moves prior to the opponents first move - given the level of overall sight they had it seems a bit picky going on about that again in a WC match - also since you posted fog Rule statements on games not requiring it which was confusing.
I really would expect a high ranked team to be a bit less sensitive to this especially so far ahead already.


I would agree with this. I don't think dorsettrob meant to take an advantage in the first place, and he copy pasted the log before fairman played his first turn. I think that fairman didn't notice he did when he played his first turn as he might not have rechecked the chat, so it's pretty much his own fault. I think we're being extremely picky here...
Been in a clan game once where the opponent was last to join, and as I had a few turns to play with a clanmate that was online with me. So we played all our turns even that game, the opponent went all crazy as he hadn't taken the snap after joining. I copy pasted the log before his first turn and apologized, and he was still completely pissed for the rest of the game and ended up deadbeating.. Really thought it was poor sports.
And yes, on conquer maps no need for fog rules!
Anyways, seems like a legit FAD win to me, let's use common sense (fairman has to agree with such username!!!!! :P :D ).
Image
User avatar
Major betiko
 
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: location, location
22

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby Mad777 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 12:33 pm

Game 15585128 & Game 15585130.

betiko, if you look closer the game log you will found than in game 15585130 the copy/paste didn't work out and fairman had to play before dorsettrob paste the rest of the copy/paste, was less than 4 hours remain for fairman but was late in Europe time...

The othe remark was the sight losses not mentioned on time neither...

Now I'm not taking any side of this just pointing than not all infos were given to fairman.

Last but not least, I never meant to enforce FoW in all 20 sets, yes I did have the game label showing "FoW" however when you create 100 games you try not to spend hours changing the label, it's about common senses of course for the map having starting point or if the player just droped without attacking (I know the rules and not a newbie in CC ;) )
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 0 - FAD 0)

Postby betiko on Thu Apr 30, 2015 12:45 pm

Mad777 wrote:Game 15585128 & Game 15585130.

betiko, if you look closer the game log you will found than in game 15585130 the copy/paste didn't work out and fairman had to play before dorsettrob paste the rest of the copy/paste, was less than 4 hours remain for fairman but was late in Europe time...

The othe remark was the sight losses not mentioned on time neither...

Now I'm not taking any side of this just pointing than not all infos were given to fairman.

Last but not least, I never meant to enforce FoW in all 20 sets, yes I did have the game label showing "FoW" however when you create 100 games you try not to spend hours changing the label, it's about common senses of course for the map having starting point or if the player just droped without attacking (I know the rules and not a newbie in CC ;) )


dude seriously... don't be so swiss! :lol: :lol:

so he dropped within the qualifier 3 to attack a qualifier 3 territory (the copy paste not working correctly we can't see which one..). That is 100% of the useful information you need as the only territory that comes out of this qualifier 3 group is new zealand. We're embarassing ourselves to even mention it.
Image
User avatar
Major betiko
 
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: location, location
22

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 5 - FAD 2)

Postby Mad777 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:19 pm

bergy1 wrote:For me Dorsettrob gave the lines of the moves prior to the opponents first move - given the level of overall sight they had it seems a bit picky going on about that again in a WC match - also since you posted fog Rule statements on games not requiring it which was confusing.
I really would expect a high ranked team to be a bit less sensitive to this especially so far ahead already.


bergy1, like I answer you in the PM the other day, its all good, being my first clan event as an organizer I was just trying to make sure the rules are followed as agreed, this situation has been clear on our side and we are still looking forward to have fun playing against you all. 8-)
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 7 - FAD 2)

Postby bergy1 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 4:07 pm

Same here :)

Your guys are good at their specialist maps - hope we can keep the door open by the end of this round
Image
User avatar
Colonel bergy1
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:14 pm
Location: Bristol UK

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 7 - FAD 2)

Postby Mad777 on Fri May 01, 2015 5:41 am

Players for tie break set selected, games to be send today or tomorrow.
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 11 - FAD 3)

Postby Mad777 on Sat May 02, 2015 11:22 am

Tie Break set of 5 games sent out, Good Luck!
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 16 - FAD 5)

Postby Mad777 on Sat May 09, 2015 2:09 pm

1st post scores updated, FAD home games set created and invitations are out, Good Luck!
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
User avatar
Lieutenant Mad777
 
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: [1v1] LHDD vs FAD (LHDD 16 - FAD 5)

Postby dragon dor on Tue May 12, 2015 5:17 am

bon bha va faloir prié je commence 2 sur les 5 / et le gars prends tous sont temps avant de faire les tours donc patiente je vous tiendrai au courent dans quelques mois :lol:
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class dragon dor
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:31 am
Location: France
2

Next

Return to Complete Challenges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users