qwert wrote:1. Well i think that things in CLA work totaly diferent,because you need to have several proposition, where people decide what its best, so i dont know what CLA think of this format
There is only one way to find out: Propose it to the CLA. I seriously think, if you want this to succeed, this is the best way. The CLA will run a league again for sure. And if you run your own thing alongside it, clans will divide. Some might be able to play 3-4 competitions at once, but not all. So some might play the CLA league, some might play yours, but that wouldn´t be, what we really want, no ?
Sure: If this is supposed to be the new CLA league, you will probably need to make some compromises. That is your decision. If you run your own private thing, you can decide all by yourself, how you want to do it. I see the appeal in that, but some compromising might be worth it to get the CLA behind this and really make this THE clan league @ CC.
qwert wrote:If you read carefull , League will play round robin (13 home and 13 away matches) win will be awarded with 3 points and tie will be awarded with 1 points. This give you 26 weeks of play, plus addition 10 weeks to be added for vacation, and this give you total of 36 weeks of competition duration. Still not decide what round will be play,and what round will be vacation.
Not sure, if I understand correctly, but this sounds problematic to me. You can see, that in the current CLA league some clans have trouble keeping up with the schedule & forget to submit their games, even if it is very simple to remember: New games every week. Now you want to add BYE weeks (vacation) into the mix, so that the schedule becomes very un-regular. People would need to really keep an eye on dates and things, and experience tells me: There is a lot of potential for clans to screw up. As I said: Keep it as simple as possible.
And I also repeat my argument about the 2 weeks breaks between sets: Work load & game load would be much easier. And sets/matches would not overlap so much. Quads often take 4 weeks and longer. So if you start new sets/matches weekly, you will likely already be playing your 4th or 5th set/match, before the 1st is concluded. And that simply takes away from the experience, in my opinion.
qwert wrote:Well for now i split Home and away to play separate, maybe will people vote that imediatly play Together ,and maybe will people vote for round robin, so its still open for discusion.
I have no strong opinion on this. As a matter of fact, what Pirlo just said about this, makes sense to me. My concern there is just the game load & scheduling. If you stick with 6 home games & want to count this as an entire match/set, you can almost throw a coin instead. But if you go up too much, game load increases dramatically over the entire season. So I think, this question is somewhat intertwined with the question of divisions size & scheduling.
Anyway. I only wanted to add some thoughts, not box my ideas through here.