Page 1 of 1

[EoA] Put comma after game number

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:00 pm
by agentcom
Concise description:
  • When inside of a game, there should be a comma immediately after the game number

Specifics/Details:
  • Instead of GAME 11042135 Round 1, it should be GAME 11042135, Round 1
  • Note that there are actually 3 spaces between "Game XXXXXX" and "Round X," but the forum suppresses sequential space characters

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
  • Often if I decide to PM or forum post about a game, I am inside of the game (rather than at the Game Finder screen, where this is not a problem). When I double click the game number to highlight it, it also highlights the three spaces to the right. So when I copy paste the game number to the inside of a Game tag, I have to also delete those 3 spaces.
  • This would save me and others who do this frequently about half a second every time we do this. I'm guessing it would take about 30 seconds to code. Even if this only helps a couple on the site per day, it "pays" for itself in terms of time in a month :)

Notice that this doesn't work:
Code: Select all
[Game]11042135   [/Game]


But this does:
Code: Select all
[Game]11042135[/Game]

Re: Put comma after game number

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:28 pm
by chapcrap
While I understand the basis behind the suggestion, because I have the same issue that you are describing, I don't really care about this suggestion at all. Not that big of a deal to me.

Re: Put comma after game number

PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 6:21 pm
by agentcom
It's not a big deal to me either. Just figured that it would take about 30 seconds to "fix" it. I can't see any reason why anyone would be opposed to this if it happened.

Re: Put comma after game number

PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:26 pm
by agentcom
So nobody against the idea just general apathy. I understand that. But I figure, why not?

Re: Put comma after game number

PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:20 pm
by JBlombier
lol, awesome suggestion. The beauty in this suggestion lies in its simplicity. You have my support. Eventhough I don't really care that much for it, your reasoning is rock solid.