Page 1 of 2
[GO] Elimination Game
Posted:
Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:38 pmby buckeye1
Edited OP:Concise description:- New game type that if an elimination of any player occurs, the person who eliminated that player automatically wins the game.
Posted:
Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:02 pmby cena-rules
so like a cross between term and assassin
I like but please fill out the form located at the top of the page
Posted:
Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:25 pmby Fezzig
that seems cool 1 thumb up
Posted:
Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:42 pmby ParadiceCity9
Fezzig wrote:that seems cool 1 thumb up
Posted:
Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:16 pmby BeakerWMA
Fezzig wrote:that seems cool 1 thumb up
agreed.
Posted:
Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:46 pmby TheBro
Interesting... So if everyone deadbeats except you, do you win points?
Posted:
Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:58 pmby sfhbballnut
I like it, first kill= win that'd be great
Posted:
Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:22 pmby mitchmitch11
no thats not the game of risk it is global domination thats what it advertises even.
Posted:
Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:02 pmby buckeye1
so first one to kill is not global domination, but assassin is?
Posted:
Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:52 pmby sfhbballnut
can we get a form on this? I like the idea
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:25 amby buckeye1
I am trying to get a mod on this
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:30 amby demon7896
<Subject>:
* Like an assasin, except everyone is your target
<Body>:
* Suggestion Idea:above
* Specifics:above. when someone deadbeats, like assasin, their armies stay on the board
* Why it is needed: winner take all. an interesting new style of gameplay.
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:31 amby Kaplowitz
sounds bad.
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:36 amby soundout9
I like it....easy to win on doodle earth....maybe too easy
Think about 8 player doodle earth...wow!
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:38 amby Kaplowitz
In some games, skill will not matter. People will resort to cheap tactics. A shit load of complaining. I say NO. I just dont see the point....
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:58 pmby insomniacdude
It'd be an interesting idea, but there's too much room for abuse. It'd be way too easy for multis to win a game. The two accounts wouldn't even need to team up. One account would simply need to run its armies down enough for the other account to win. Game over.
Posted:
Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:49 pmby buckeye1
and 2 player is much different how?
Posted:
Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:10 amby pissedoffsol
with 2 player, theres neutrals everywhere, and the points stake isn't remotely as high.
i like the idea. i think it would make for some fun speed, freestyle, doodle earth games
Posted:
Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:54 amby Shrinky
No, im against this. think of doodle earth 6-8 player games seq......
first person to start can immediately start out with an advantage and eliminate someone if dices are good(which is not often)
http://conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1799729
take this game as an example.
Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:22 pmby buckeye1
THEN U DON"T HVE TO PLAY THEM. I HATE A MAJORITY OF THE MAPS!!!!
Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:27 pmby Fireside Poet
It would just turn into a build game... what would be the advantage of attacking?
Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:40 pmby buckeye1
A build game? and r u a mod?
Posted:
Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:39 pmby billval3
I don't like it.
Posted:
Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:29 pmby Stoney229
Fireside Poet wrote:It would just turn into a build game... what would be the advantage of attacking?
hmm maybe, but would this be the case much more than assasin? The advantage of attacking would be to try to acquire continents, bonuses, cards etc (as well as strategic positions, e.g. isolating a weak player's terit so that you are the only one that can attack it).
Posted:
Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:19 amby a-person1192
i see potential in the idea and i know it would be a problem with multis and abuse but we could possibly make it only available to premium members like speed games are. this i think would take care of the multi problem because who would spend $50 for an online game, anyway it is a good idea.
<500th post, yoo whoo!!>