Moderator: Community Team
MichelSableheart wrote:Or a minimum won of 1 and a maximum lost of 100, as we currently have?JefJef wrote:A minimum of points won and a maximum lost.
Say 10 minimum per player win and 30 maximum per player loss.
SgtMadDog wrote:i.e, I agree they need to fix it!
But they won't, the Admin's are a bunch of socialists who believe in redistribution of wealth.
darth emperor wrote:MichelSableheart wrote:Or a minimum won of 1 and a maximum lost of 100, as we currently have?JefJef wrote:A minimum of points won and a maximum lost.
Say 10 minimum per player win and 30 maximum per player loss.
The minimum is 0
Boudicia wrote:Well i have to beat 3 or 4 small players for the same points as 1 small player beating me for the same points ....
And considering most maps are not difficult and even the one that i specialise on Third Crusade which has got s bit of skill ...that can all change if you have your go second ......so what ever mods say i know it is not fair .......as when i put out games most are small players that take up the challenge and so I'm up and down on points like a see saw
darth emperor wrote:In a 1v1, the one who goes second, has less chances, is not only Third Crusade, is in all maps, even conquest maps.
DiM wrote:darth emperor wrote:In a 1v1, the one who goes second, has less chances, is not only Third Crusade, is in all maps, even conquest maps.
not ALL maps but rather MOST maps.
for example on All Your Base Are Belong To Us the person going second often has the advantage of finding useful info and taking bonuses from the person going first.
DiM wrote:darth emperor wrote:In a 1v1, the one who goes second, has less chances, is not only Third Crusade, is in all maps, even conquest maps.
not ALL maps but rather MOST maps.
for example on All Your Base Are Belong To Us the person going second often has the advantage of finding useful info and taking bonuses from the person going first.
SirSebstar wrote:DiM wrote:darth emperor wrote:In a 1v1, the one who goes second, has less chances, is not only Third Crusade, is in all maps, even conquest maps.
not ALL maps but rather MOST maps.
for example on All Your Base Are Belong To Us the person going second often has the advantage of finding useful info and taking bonuses from the person going first.
actually going first is better, if you are not right next to eachother (in base terms, the same race)
macbone wrote:Branch out, Boudicia. They're just points, after all. Don't let your enjoyment of the site be ruined by having to risk a few more points.
Also, stop by the Captains Callout thread in the Callouts forum, and post some games other players can join.
Jippd wrote:I don't think going second in all your base is an advantage I think going first is...you can play the map going first just like you would playing second. Just because you go first doesn't mean you have to move first but you do get that extra deploy.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users