Conquer Club

can you get banned for having only 1 point?
would anybody ever get banned for having one point?

What's your point?

I think they'd possibly be accused of point dumping.

mpjh wrote:What's your point?

Jan 2nd someone with low points could win a battle royal and get really nice nice points. 109 players at 100 each is 10,900 in score from one game.

This thread inspired me to look at the bottom of the scoreboard...

I saw a few that seem really fishy:

name - score - games played - won (%)

nomani 112 1753 444 (25%)
SlickChrisDruler 457 4306 1800 (42%)
phucewe2 526 675 154 (23%)

See, they all have many games played, and a win percentage over 20, yet their score is suspiciously low...

1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.

Colton

Read this thread

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=98690&p=2249746#p2249746

Nipper

Bruceswar wrote:

mpjh wrote:What's your point?

Jan 2nd someone with low points could win a battle royal and get really nice nice points. 109 players at 100 each is 10,900 in score from one game.

OHHHHH. I thought he was talking about point of view. Yes, you can get banned, depending on whether you express a point of view that is racists or bigoted. Never played battle royal, so don't know the score there.

so that means a point dumper can get about 11k of points and is number 1 thats not rightbut man i wish i could win a battle royal game

colton24 wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.

well i think so

There have been many at one point, and they were banned for Lowballing.

yes you can its called point dumping

Gilligan wrote:There have been many at one point, and they were banned for Lowballing.

Low-balling's something different

As a LOL - AAFitz gonna have to turn his own father in soon if he's not careful

But the thread clearly shows that the guys were taking the piss..

isnt low balling \where your pants sag or thats what i heard

lord voldemort wrote:

colton24 wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.

well i think so

Right so when I was a 210 cook I was automatically point dumping.

colton24 wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:

colton24 wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.

You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.

well i think so

Right so when I was a 210 cook I was automatically point dumping.

What are you trying to prove, here? The discussion is about nearing 1 point. Having 265 (which is actually your low, not 210) is not close to 1.

c-rod91339 wrote:isnt low balling \where your pants sag or thats what i heard

No. It's when a good player takes some low-ranks and just tells them what to do in a game against multiple high-ranks. For maximum point gain. Like this asshole.

the.killing.44 wrote:

c-rod91339 wrote:isnt low balling \where your pants sag or thats what i heard

No. It's when a good player takes some low-ranks and just tells them what to do in a game against multiple high-ranks. For maximum point gain. Like this asshole.

nooo low balling is actively trying to get to 1 point...
@ colton....210 points is a far cry from 1 point

the.killing.44 wrote:

Gilligan wrote:There have been many at one point, and they were banned for Lowballing.

Low-balling's something different

Uhh.... lowballing is TRYING to get one point, which is what he asked about in the first post...

lol whoops