Conquer Club

game chat quotes from player Myrmidon on game 6230705 disappeared.
this guy instigated a riot on the game, spoiled everything and now his stupid quotes disappeared! How is this possible?

did you foe him?

but of course!!! : )

I was beginning to believe that he was some kind of hack sorcerer besides being a complete thrash.

thanks!

From the FAQ, located on the Help Page wrote:43. Game Chat messages disappeared, what happened?

You placed the author(s) on your Foes List, so their messages were filtered out of the Game Chat.

--Andy

chicodasilva wrote:game chat quotes from player Myrmidon on game 6230705 disappeared.
this guy instigated a riot on the game, spoiled everything and now his stupid quotes disappeared! How is this possible?

Just wondering...if you think like that of him...why do you care about his "stupid quotes"?


just curious...

darth emperor wrote:

chicodasilva wrote:game chat quotes from player Myrmidon on game 6230705 disappeared.
this guy instigated a riot on the game, spoiled everything and now his stupid quotes disappeared! How is this possible?

Just wondering...if you think like that of him...why do you care about his "stupid quotes"?


just curious...

could b curiosity..
wuldnt u be curious if it had happened to you?

iamkoolerthanu wrote:

darth emperor wrote:

chicodasilva wrote:game chat quotes from player Myrmidon on game 6230705 disappeared.
this guy instigated a riot on the game, spoiled everything and now his stupid quotes disappeared! How is this possible?

Just wondering...if you think like that of him...why do you care about his "stupid quotes"?


just curious...

could b curiosity..
wuldnt u be curious if it had happened to you?

No,because I know it seriously yes maybe but also i woudnt bother much if i didnt like not even a comment and if I was so angry has he is

Quite funny tho - the best bit for me is about putting all your meat on the grill

darth emperor wrote:

iamkoolerthanu wrote:

darth emperor wrote:

chicodasilva wrote:game chat quotes from player Myrmidon on game 6230705 disappeared.
this guy instigated a riot on the game, spoiled everything and now his stupid quotes disappeared! How is this possible?

Just wondering...if you think like that of him...why do you care about his "stupid quotes"?


just curious...

could b curiosity..
wuldnt u be curious if it had happened to you?

No,because I know it seriously yes maybe but also i woudnt bother much if i didnt like not even a comment and if I was so angry has he is

lmaoo, i had a feeling u were gunna say somethin like that but look wat i just noticed... his interests? on his profile... intentional deadbeating? i dont know if its some sortof a joke but.... lol

iamkoolerthanu wrote:

darth emperor wrote:

iamkoolerthanu wrote:

darth emperor wrote:

chicodasilva wrote:game chat quotes from player Myrmidon on game 6230705 disappeared.
this guy instigated a riot on the game, spoiled everything and now his stupid quotes disappeared! How is this possible?

Just wondering...if you think like that of him...why do you care about his "stupid quotes"?


just curious...

could b curiosity..
wuldnt u be curious if it had happened to you?

No,because I know it seriously yes maybe but also i woudnt bother much if i didnt like not even a comment and if I was so angry has he is

lmaoo, i had a feeling u were gunna say somethin like that but look wat i just noticed... his interests? on his profile... intentional deadbeating? i dont know if its some sortof a joke but.... lol

well he says...that if we propose him truce...he'll deadbeat... so ill play with him a lot of 1v1 and of them I'll say "Hey let's truce against neutral,they are very dangerous" and points for me

darth emperor: LMAO

y, i had interest to see his quotes. some may have and some not..is that a big deal? think not.

The big issue here is to have found a nice place to play some games, purchase a premium, and be falsely accused of secret diplomacy by a bullshit talker!
when you're accused and know the guy is lying, some make it a big deal and some not...guess i did.

as for my interests quote, don't you hate to lose time in spoiled games? think it's fair play to have the 2 biggest players on a given game say " hey, lets truce and kick the other(s) guy(s)"? what's the point of playing doubles then?! Really, to me it makes no sense.

oh, and those guys who keep saying "look! that one already has bonus! lets kick him guys!" they shure are bright!...just not enough to realize that others have eyes and brain just like them...

you know, one thing i like in CC is you have a lot of options, fog, no fog, chained, unlimited... wouldn't be nice to choose between truces and no truces?

chicodasilva wrote:y, i had interest to see his quotes. some may have and some not..is that a big deal? think not.

No is not a big deal...as I said I was curious about that

chicodasilva wrote:as for my interests quote, don't you hate to lose time in spoiled games? think it's fair play to have the 2 biggest players on a given game say " hey, lets truce and kick the other(s) guy(s)"? what's the point of playing doubles then?! Really, to me it makes no sense.

Well you have to understand that,diplomacy is very very important...and this things happens in diplomacy people ally in order not to attack each other...this a big issue in 3 players game...there are people (like you) who detests this things...and others (like me) think is part of the game and something very natural...and normally they will join the 2 weakest ones... doubles is another sistem but in doubles you also can see team 1 and team 2 has allied against team 3...and normally in a 3 game they have truce the weakest one to confort the strongest one...but when there are two strong normally the attack each other and leave alone the weakest one...and after some rounds the weakest one recovers...so in order to avoid the future threat they want to kill first...I mean this is very unusual but it can happen...

chicodasilva wrote:oh, and those guys who keep saying "look! that one already has bonus! lets kick him guys!" they shure are bright!...just not enough to realize that others have eyes and brain just like them...

Well, its reasonable...who tells you that the other one has also seen that? maybe you lost concetration...or you weren't paying much attention...or you dont realize...this thing happens and more in larger maps... but ussually people who says this they do after some rounds

example: playing 4 players A,B,C,D
A holds asia
B tries to take Asia to A,sometimes succeds sometimes fails...but A can recover
C attack or D or B
D attacks or C or B
So A can hold easily asia and gets stronger so after 2 rounds B gets annoyed and says in the chat
Hey A has Asia we should stop him
And this is the reason...of course my example is a little exaggerated but thats the idea

chicodasilva wrote:you know, one thing i like in CC is you have a lot of options, fog, no fog, chained, unlimited... wouldn't be nice to choose between truces and no truces?

Well this wouldnt be possible because many players dont do truces but if they did it wouldn't be a big difference

example: A,B,C are playing(D got eliminated )
A is very strong
B decides just to attack A because is the biggest thread
C decides just to attack A because is the biggest thread
A gets weaker and C gets stronger
B decides just to attack C because is the biggest thread
A decides just to attack C because is the biggest thread

As you can see it would be the same as
B:A is stronger so we should have truce till he gets weaker do you agree C?
C:yes
----
C:now that A is weaker lets break our truce ok?
B: agree
----
A:We should truce B or C will win agree?
B:yes

As you can see is practically the samething with the exception that in the second case the thing are clearer...in the first example it happens because it's just common sense,so many games will happen that they are not in truce but they look like because of common sense they dont attack each other

I agree with everything you say, especially when you say "many games will happen that they are not in truce but they look like because of common sense they dont attack each other". This makes much more sense to me, as i normally make "silent" truces, but I'm very noob here and just used to play risk in the board with some friends...here things are A LOT different! It's not that i don't like it, i do a lot, but some guys just spoil the fun of the game... of course, they give us a foe list, but in this case it came too late.

thanks for the reply, and be sure i'll truce neutral to kick your ass if we play 1v1

see you

but the problem of the "silent truce"(something I forgot so say) are two

-That you can be accused of secret diplomacy

-That even that is common people don't do it...remeber my example of when A holds Asia,its common sense to attack A...but neither C neither D are attacking him...so the "silent truce" is not so effective...the silent truce are more tipical of people with experience...