It is like I said before, coded played this scheme last year. I don't really think that it gained him a lot, but it did redistribute a ton of points down the leaderboard.
It basicly works like this, for those of you that are not aware.
First you create a shitload of 1v1 games on small maps like doodle or lux.
Then you try to finish the lost cause games first. But you need to do them in order of highest ranks first, and work your way down to the low rankers. This assures that you loose the least amount of points.
also, you want to throw in a few wins with low rankers to try to disguise what you are up to.
Then once that is out of the way, you are now a very low rank, (probable cook).
Now you are poised to start the climb back up the ladder.
You then want to start finishing your winning games in the same order of high rankers first. this assures that you gain the optimal amount of points.
And as fast as fell, now you start climbing. You collect 50 or more points per win, for beating your actual peers.
Like I said, I don't think that in the end you really make out that much, but for the Major that joined 10, 20, 30 or more of your games, it robs him blind. For him to break even with you he must win 8, or 9 out of 10 games.
Now, if HA wanted to just try for some silly record of most active games, I would not care one way or the other. But when I see him operating in the above described fashion, I must question his actual motives.
From looking at his games, it seems pretty clear what they truly are. And this nonsense about how it is not possible to keep track of all those games like that, is rubbish. It is as simple as shooting ducks in a barrel.
Now, he has started off exactly as described above. Lets see if he now deviates from the system, bites the bullet, and actually plays each game in chronological order.