Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:50 pmbigg chief wrote:Grade 9 was fun , college was more funner though !
Sure, we have freedom of speech. But I lol'ed.
Sure, we have freedom of speech. But I lol'ed.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
CC is not what it used to be
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=182762
Page 5 of 5
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:50 pmSure, we have freedom of speech. But I lol'ed.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:07 pmbut I rotflmao !
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:21 pmYou told me you drink cocktails Chief. How many Alligator Coolers would you get for $75?bigg chief wrote: 75 bucks that is almost 2 cases of beer
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:41 pm7.33 to be exact ! We are highly taxed in the province I live in @ 15 %, a 26er of rye is $25.50, a case of bud is $34.95 ,melon liqueur is $19 or $20
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:53 amJohnny Rockets wrote:hulmey wrote:
Checked my dice stats and i have -66% luck in 3 vs 1 situation's, -58% luck 2 vs 1 and 3 vs 2 have -11% luck. it just totally messes any strategy you might have. Might as well not bother
The Fact that you attack in these situations explains your "luck".
JRock
Don't u attack with 3 dice versus 1? Haha
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:35 pmJohnny Rockets wrote:You like to attack a lot of 3v1's? 2v1's?
Send me an invite then, rube.
JRock
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_%28ga ... babilities
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:51 pm
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:12 pmI miss Classic Art. My winning percentage was so much better than on Classic.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:28 pmThe Voice wrote:I miss Classic Art. My winning percentage was so much better than on Classic.
I wish I could have had a chance to play that map.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:41 pmFunkyterrance wrote:The Voice wrote:I miss Classic Art. My winning percentage was so much better than on Classic.
I wish I could have had a chance to play that map.
It was interesting to look at. Like a poorly designed museum floorplan
BMO
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:46 pmrdsrds2120 wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:The Voice wrote:I miss Classic Art. My winning percentage was so much better than on Classic.
I wish I could have had a chance to play that map.
It was interesting to look at. Like a poorly designed museum floorplan
BMO
Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:46 amFunkyterrance wrote:Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will
- Click image to enlarge.
BMO
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:12 amI miss classic art.
Would be nice to see it back with Classic cities. Maybe each year for a week at the birthday bash.
Would be nice to see it back with Classic cities. Maybe each year for a week at the birthday bash.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:32 amrdsrds2120 wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will
- Click image to enlarge.
BMO
I remember that one....Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:26 amrdsrds2120 wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will
- Click image to enlarge.
BMO
Cool, thanks, that's half the battle. Now where can I play it?
It does seem to be lacking that certain something, that indefinable "it", but I want a shot at it anyway.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:16 amFunkyterrance wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will
- Click image to enlarge.
BMO
Cool, thanks, that's half the battle. Now where can I play it?
It does seem to be lacking that certain something, that indefinable "it", but I want a shot at it anyway.
Here you go:
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:16 amclassic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:55 amqwert wrote:classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.
lol, I agree. I go
whenever I see it, or hear people praise it. Anyone can make a map like that, anyone!Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 9:00 amAAFitz wrote:qwert wrote:classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.
sorry to say, I enjoy classic art, more than WWII Europe which is overdone, and not made for players as much as mapmakers.
Next time, keep it more simple, and people will enjoy playing it. I respect the art of it, but Im here to play risk, not look at pretty pictures.
Im amazed at how many map makers miss this, and ruin lots of maps, in the effort to make them better. You are even bragging about it here, oblivious to what people actually like, and knocking those who did a great job of providing just that.
Have you ever seen landgrab? Here: http://landgrab.net/landgrab/Home I think this site is better for you. No fancy graphics, just like you want.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 9:25 amqwert wrote:classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.
And you know full well that shapes and art where made quickly to fill the void after the original classic map was taken down.
Neither where great maps, we all know that, but both maps went around the foundry for the above reason. But like art, I would not mind a few games on this one for nostalgia reasons.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:06 amkoontz1973 wrote:qwert wrote:classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.
And you know full well that shapes and art where made quickly to fill the void after the original classic map was taken down.
Neither where great maps, we all know that, but both maps went around the foundry for the above reason. But like art, I would not mind a few games on this one for nostalgia reasons.
i dont mind for temporary maps, but for all these crap people dont need to be awarded, especially for classic crap. I only can hope that these kind of work never hepend again, and that all work you do in map foundry.
If i do these ,i will refuse any award, because these dont deserve any reward.
AAFitz wrote:
sorry to say, I enjoy classic art, more than WWII Europe which is overdone, and not made for players as much as mapmakers.
Next time, keep it more simple, and people will enjoy playing it. I respect the art of it, but Im here to play risk, not look at pretty pictures.
Im amazed at how many map makers miss this, and ruin lots of maps, in the effort to make them better. You are even bragging about it here, oblivious to what people actually like, and knocking those who did a great job of providing just that.
Im sorry aafitz, but maps like Classic Crap(art), simple maps with zero graphic, are prohibited to be made in regular work,and all map makers who will even try to create similar style are blocked right in beginning,in map foundry. If you want more maps like these, then you need to make some suggestion and to find many voters, to decrease many high standards in map making. If you succeed, then existence of Foundry foreman, will not be need, because everybody will be in position to make these type of maps.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:33 amSo in a sense, qwert has proven this thread is true. CC is not what it used to be as maps like these will never be made again.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:27 pmGillipig wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will
- Click image to enlarge.
BMO
Cool, thanks, that's half the battle. Now where can I play it?
It does seem to be lacking that certain something, that indefinable "it", but I want a shot at it anyway.
Here you go:
I appreciate your trying to help Gillipig but you haven't been paying attention.
Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:06 pmFunkyterrance wrote:Gillipig wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will
- Click image to enlarge.
BMO
Cool, thanks, that's half the battle. Now where can I play it?
It does seem to be lacking that certain something, that indefinable "it", but I want a shot at it anyway.
Here you go:
I appreciate your trying to help Gillipig but you haven't been paying attention.
you're one of a kind funky, one of a kind.Re: CC is not what it used to be
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:44 pmGillipig wrote:
I did get your joke/point, Gillipig, It's just that I'm looking for the "feel" of the board game. I'm inclined to believe that the Classic Art map would capture this "feel" better than the available classic map.
The classic map is a bit too spider-webby for me to get that old time feeling.