Conquer Club

A collection of frequent bull shit dice games. Count my opponents expanding. I should started a thread like this several years ago. It'd been the most frequent thread.

If you're here just to act like the clown you are without have a clue what a vast difference in terts for the setting is, stay away from leave a comment. I might just foe you. These games are extremes.

10.26.2013 Game 13508862 Round 5. 30 terts vs 14.
10.27.2013 Game 13508862 Round 6. 27 terts and 3 full kingdoms vs 15. He even run another 12 terts. This guy even complaint about bad dice.
10.27.2013 Game 13512912 Round 3. 21 terts + a Village vs mine 21. Round 4 knock out all of one of my Kingdom's. Far over the top.
10.27.2013 Game 13514844 Knock out my Kingdom in round 5 which is extreme. I ran across the map to hit back just to meet his 2nd Kingdom's gate blocked by just as big stack as my main stack. Two extremes.
10.28.2013 Game 13519207 Another Private 1 Class. Noth that his dice were extreme but mine extreme bad. Round 15 he drop 18 troops + two villages. My main stack carry 16.
10.28.2013 Game 13519948 Another.
10.28.2013 Game 13519991 Yet another. And second in order. Second in order. Second in order.
10.29.2013 Game 13523253, Game 13523299, Game 13523352, Game 13523393, Game 13523515. X games in a row second in order.
10.29.2013 Game 13524200 One side dice on my disfavor.
10.31.2013 Game 13533139 What's scary. This guy actually even talk about dice in my favor. We've played some games. He just do it in game after game after game after game. But it's me that has the luck. I wonder what this guy are used to when it comes to luck.
11.01.2013 Game 13533421 Same as above.
11.01.2013 Game 13533732 Extreme one side dice in my disfavor.
11.02.2013 Game 13537676 OPPONENT complain about dice.
11.02.2013 Game 13539414 Complete unintresting game due one side dice. Second in order.
11.02.2013 Game 13539923 Same. One side dice in my disfavor. Second in order.
11.02.2013 Game 13540602 Another one. First in order but drop and one side dice in my disfavor.
11.02.2013 Game 13542074 I had 2-3 game balls but failed over and over. Second in order.
11.03.2013 Game 13544115 One side dice in my disfavor.
11.03.2013 Game 13544102 One side dice in my disfavor.
11.03.2013 Game 13544084 One side dice in my disfavor.
11.03.2013 Game 13544885 Extreme one side dice in my disfavor.
11.03.2013 Game 13545463 Extreme one side dice in my disfavor.
11.03.2013 Game 13545997 Extreme one side dice n my disfavor.
11.04.2013 Game 13548275 Extreme one side dice in my disfavor.
11.04.2014 Game 13548528 Top 10 most extreme one side dice in my disfavor.
11.04.2013 Game 13548542 Another. Second in order for both recent games.
11.04.2013 Game 13550201 Order, drop and extreme dice in my disfavor. This is the mantra in my classic polymorphic.
11.04.2013 Game 13550586 Drop, dice and order.
11.04.2013 Game 13550672 I had area bonus for 6 rounds. My opponent went for wrong target in the end game and save me the game. One side dice. I was even first in order. A mistake saved me.

Your a SOC training adviser...

I wonder what your best advises are... if you lose, blame it on the dice?

frankiebee wrote:Your a SOC training adviser...

I wonder what your best advises are... if you lose, blame it on the dice?

Well, the setting obvously is not your prime setting. Why comment on a topic you don't understand?

frankiebee wrote:Your a SOC training adviser...

I wonder what your best advises are... if you lose, blame it on the dice?

chang50 wrote:

frankiebee wrote:Your a SOC training adviser...

I wonder what your best advises are... if you lose, blame it on the dice?

I've posted 3 games in just 24 hours. Calm down.

If I told you I played a total of 25 games and was second in order in 22. Would you still laugh? What about being second in order in 30 out of 36 games in a row? Different setting though but still.

lt.Futt wrote:

chang50 wrote:

frankiebee wrote:Your a SOC training adviser...

I wonder what your best advises are... if you lose, blame it on the dice?

I've posted 3 games in just 24 hours. Calm down.

If I told you I played a total of 25 games and was second in order in 22. Would you still laugh? What about being second in order in 30 out of 36 games in a row? Different setting though but still.

I always laugh at people who think they are especially unlucky or singled out for bad luck.Without links to the games it's impossible to judge,and even then a small sample doesn't prove much.

so are u talking about dice or turn order..does it mean is a plot against you?

lt.Futt wrote:A collection of frequent bull shit dice games. Count my opponents expanding. I should started a thread like this several years ago. It'd been the most frequent thread.

If you're here just to act like the clown you are without have a clue what a vast difference in terts for the setting is, stay away from leave a comment. I might just foe you. These games are extremes.

10.26.2013 Game 13508862 Round 5. 30 terts vs 14.
10.27.2013 Game 13508862 Round 6. 27 terts and 3 full kingdoms vs 15. He even run another 12 terts. This guy even complaint about bad dice.
10.27.2013 Game 13512912 Round 3. 21 terts + a Village vs mine 21. Round 4 knock out all of one of my Kingdom's. Far over the top.

You complain about that first game with him having 30 terts vs your 14 in round 5. Somehow, you forgot to mention how you had 30 terts and he only had 24 by round 7. You actually took 21 terts in one roll. Reviewing the game shows you each had some good dice runs. When he had his last run you just quit by missing 3 turns in a row...

lt.Futt wrote:A collection of frequent bull shit dice games. Count my opponents expanding. I should started a thread like this several years ago. It'd been the most frequent thread.

If you're here just to act like the clown you are without have a clue what a vast difference in terts for the setting is, stay away from leave a comment. I might just foe you. These games are extremes.

10.26.2013 Game 13508862 Round 5. 30 terts vs 14.
10.27.2013 Game 13508862 Round 6. 27 terts and 3 full kingdoms vs 15. He even run another 12 terts. This guy even complaint about bad dice.
10.27.2013 Game 13512912 Round 3. 21 terts + a Village vs mine 21. Round 4 knock out all of one of my Kingdom's. Far over the top.

In game 13512912 he attacked one of your kingdoms which is normal in round 4. You then made the critical error of trying to backdoor his starting point and clearing his village. Had you gone directly to the taken castle you likely would have succeeded. You blame the dice but they had very little to do with the outcome. It would also be good to note that you dropped all of your deploy in round 2 and round 3 on your northern castle. Given that, it was unlucky that your opponent attacked your other castle. I would also add your launch out in round 3 seems strange. I can only assume you were trying to link to your other castle but given the distance that would seem to be very bad strategy. That map is a stack and blast map. Instead of attacking you were stretching your troops. Your opponent chose to attack quickly and won the game...

lt.Futt wrote:A collection of frequent bull shit dice games. Count my opponents expanding. I should started a thread like this several years ago. It'd been the most frequent thread.

If you're here just to act like the clown you are without have a clue what a vast difference in terts for the setting is, stay away from leave a comment. I might just foe you. These games are extremes.

10.26.2013 Game 13508862 Round 5. 30 terts vs 14.
10.27.2013 Game 13508862 Round 6. 27 terts and 3 full kingdoms vs 15. He even run another 12 terts. This guy even complaint about bad dice.
10.27.2013 Game 13512912 Round 3. 21 terts + a Village vs mine 21. Round 4 knock out all of one of my Kingdom's. Far over the top.

show: Chat log from Game 13508862

So if I am to understand this correctly, you foed him because of his insanely good luck?

Not because he was mouthy or he ruined your game against another player(there were only two of you after all), but because he beat you with the help of some improbably good dice? Do you always foe so easily?

Artimis wrote:

lt.Futt wrote:A collection of frequent bull shit dice games. Count my opponents expanding. I should started a thread like this several years ago. It'd been the most frequent thread.

If you're here just to act like the clown you are without have a clue what a vast difference in terts for the setting is, stay away from leave a comment. I might just foe you. These games are extremes.

10.26.2013 Game 13508862 Round 5. 30 terts vs 14.
10.27.2013 Game 13508862 Round 6. 27 terts and 3 full kingdoms vs 15. He even run another 12 terts. This guy even complaint about bad dice.
10.27.2013 Game 13512912 Round 3. 21 terts + a Village vs mine 21. Round 4 knock out all of one of my Kingdom's. Far over the top.

show: Chat log from Game 13508862

So if I am to understand this correctly, you foed him because of his insanely good luck?

Not because he was mouthy or he ruined your game against another player(there were only two of you after all), but because he beat you with the help of some improbably good dice? Do you always foe so easily?

What I am trying to show is the frequent one side dice in my disfavor. His dice are estimated top 10 all time.

One time estimated dice top 10. Foe. Series of estimated dice top 1000. Foe.

loutil wrote:

lt.Futt wrote:A collection of frequent bull shit dice games. Count my opponents expanding. I should started a thread like this several years ago. It'd been the most frequent thread.

If you're here just to act like the clown you are without have a clue what a vast difference in terts for the setting is, stay away from leave a comment. I might just foe you. These games are extremes.

10.26.2013 Game 13508862 Round 5. 30 terts vs 14.
10.27.2013 Game 13508862 Round 6. 27 terts and 3 full kingdoms vs 15. He even run another 12 terts. This guy even complaint about bad dice.
10.27.2013 Game 13512912 Round 3. 21 terts + a Village vs mine 21. Round 4 knock out all of one of my Kingdom's. Far over the top.

In game 13512912 he attacked one of your kingdoms which is normal in round 4. You then made the critical error of trying to backdoor his starting point and clearing his village. Had you gone directly to the taken castle you likely would have succeeded. You blame the dice but they had very little to do with the outcome. It would also be good to note that you dropped all of your deploy in round 2 and round 3 on your northern castle. Given that, it was unlucky that your opponent attacked your other castle. I would also add your launch out in round 3 seems strange. I can only assume you were trying to link to your other castle but given the distance that would seem to be very bad strategy. That map is a stack and blast map. Instead of attacking you were stretching your troops. Your opponent chose to attack quickly and won the game...

I guess that I've played the setting a few thousands of times. I can remember losing one of my Kingdoms' in round 4 happen 2 times. Might have happened more than 2 times but I remember 2 times. It's extreme. Believe me.

If the setting is "stack and blast". That's not what he did. I did. I did stack in the North. However it's fog. We can't know where our opponent are.

I'd like to challegne you for the setting. Looks like this is not your prime setting. It's mine. However I've made a strategy based on weaker dice than my opponents which "everybody copies" in order to improve.

Doesn't matter Village or Castle. He knock out one of my Kingdoms'. I deploy 11. I could likely take the Castle but not all Kingdom back. What happens next? He receive troops for 2 and a half Kingdoms and village while I am exhausted. What does that mean. That means it makes no difference. It was game.

loutil wrote:You complain about that first game with him having 30 terts vs your 14 in round 5. Somehow, you forgot to mention how you had 30 terts and he only had 24 by round 7. You actually took 21 terts in one roll. Reviewing the game shows you each had some good dice runs. When he had his last run you just quit by missing 3 turns in a row...

Round 7 was not adequat. I ran 21 terts but 6 of his. Either you believe it or not. Too little and too late.

I consider myself for grand master for the setting. No need to discuss.

Armandolas wrote:so are u talking about dice or turn order..does it mean is a plot against you?

No plot. It's just the way it is as the topic indicates.

So unlucky of you to get bad luck in a game based on luck.

Futt, i know you have me foed because i beat you too often. The truth is that you suck terribly. I ve had the missfortune to team with you in a speed dubs, and you play like shit blaming it on the dice all the time and not even reading my recomendations to discuss your turns. I don t know how the hell can people let you advise others when you are such a terrible player and in the top 5 sore losers of the site. Go play candy crush.

betiko wrote:Futt, i know you have me foed because i beat you too often. The truth is that you suck terribly. I ve had the missfortune to team with you in a speed dubs, and you play like shit blaming it on the dice all the time and not even reading my recomendations to discuss your turns. I don t know how the hell can people let you advise others when you are such a terrible player and in the top 5 sore losers of the site. Go play candy crush.

You've beaten me far too often in my prime settings. The odds for a win may be like 50/50 but you completely destroy me every time. There are "a handful players" I can't beat no matter. No need even play them; no need try. However you had insults against me. That's personal and foe. I don't bother people that attack others personally. We have different qualities.

lt.Futt wrote:

betiko wrote:Futt, i know you have me foed because i beat you too often. The truth is that you suck terribly. I ve had the missfortune to team with you in a speed dubs, and you play like shit blaming it on the dice all the time and not even reading my recomendations to discuss your turns. I don t know how the hell can people let you advise others when you are such a terrible player and in the top 5 sore losers of the site. Go play candy crush.

You've beaten me far too often in my prime settings. The odds for a win may be like 50/50 but you completely destroy me every time. There are "a handful players" I can't beat no matter. No need even play them; no need try. However you had insults against me. That's personal and foe. I don't bother people that attack others personally. We have different qualities.

The handful of players you can't seem to win against are precisely the ones you should play in order to learn from them,although going off what you've posted already you don't appear to think you have anything to learn.A common trait with whiners.

lt.Futt wrote:

betiko wrote:Futt, i know you have me foed because i beat you too often. The truth is that you suck terribly. I ve had the missfortune to team with you in a speed dubs, and you play like shit blaming it on the dice all the time and not even reading my recomendations to discuss your turns. I don t know how the hell can people let you advise others when you are such a terrible player and in the top 5 sore losers of the site. Go play candy crush.

You've beaten me far too often in my prime settings. The odds for a win may be like 50/50 but you completely destroy me every time. There are "a handful players" I can't beat no matter. No need even play them; no need try. However you had insults against me. That's personal and foe. I don't bother people that attack others personally. We have different qualities.

Futt, I noticed you responded to my post in the official dice bitch thread with much the same kind of waspish attitude you show where.

Why have I ceased to be amazed by those who put themselves forth as teachers because, for some odd reason known only to themselves, they think they know more than any one else and so show self righteous symptoms usually based upon a delusional awareness of their own skill levels. Perhaps there is a person out there who could explain this phenomenon of some teachers actually believing that because they teach they can actually do.

lt.Futt wrote:

betiko wrote:Futt, i know you have me foed because i beat you too often. The truth is that you suck terribly. I ve had the missfortune to team with you in a speed dubs, and you play like shit blaming it on the dice all the time and not even reading my recomendations to discuss your turns. I don t know how the hell can people let you advise others when you are such a terrible player and in the top 5 sore losers of the site. Go play candy crush.

You've beaten me far too often in my prime settings. The odds for a win may be like 50/50 but you completely destroy me every time. There are "a handful players" I can't beat no matter. No need even play them; no need try.

babagonosh was like that for me in tournaments. beating him was almost as good as winning the entire tournament.

Fruitcake wrote:Futt, I noticed you responded to my post in the official dice bitch thread with much the same kind of waspish attitude you show where.

My responding to you are pretty much in your spirit. Don't you think? It's right back in your face. Right.Back.In.Your.Face. And you gotta live with that.

This has nothing to do with The SoC. You're a complete ignorant when it comes to The SoC and the job they do. The SoC is a official cc social group. Does no more harm than any social group or any clan or player. The SoC are suppose to teach the basics but The SoC students get much more than the basics. You don't have to be the best to teach others. You need to know the basics and you need to be willing to teach and to help others.

Not everybody need teaching from The SoC. It's an offer just.

Even though you complete miss the target attacking The SoC, you're not that far out the SoC topic as you are the topic for the thread.

greenoaks wrote:

lt.Futt wrote:

betiko wrote:Futt, i know you have me foed because i beat you too often. The truth is that you suck terribly. I ve had the missfortune to team with you in a speed dubs, and you play like shit blaming it on the dice all the time and not even reading my recomendations to discuss your turns. I don t know how the hell can people let you advise others when you are such a terrible player and in the top 5 sore losers of the site. Go play candy crush.

You've beaten me far too often in my prime settings. The odds for a win may be like 50/50 but you completely destroy me every time. There are "a handful players" I can't beat no matter. No need even play them; no need try.

babagonosh was like that for me in tournaments. beating him was almost as good as winning the entire tournament.

really? just checked and I'm 12-6 vs baba, almost all tournament games. he's always been a very classy opponent, I wouldn't imagine him doing stuff like that.

Just wanna point something out.. I don't think Hannibal 19's dice stats are even correct. He's played only 2000 less games than I have, but his total dice is this:
1:20168 2:20751 3:20745 4:20810 5:21086 6:20789

While mine is this:
1:314885 2:322400 3:320651 4:322097 5:320932 6:320294

Gabriel13 wrote:Just wanna point something out.. I don't think Hannibal 19's dice stats are even correct. He's played only 2000 less games than I have, but his total dice is this:
1:20168 2:20751 3:20745 4:20810 5:21086 6:20789

While mine is this:
1:314885 2:322400 3:320651 4:322097 5:320932 6:320294

maybe he doesn t play escalating as often as you do; or maybe he doesn't play as many multi player games as you do, or maybe he only plays on smaller maps. I don't see why you expect the amount of dice rolls to be proportionate to the number of game played given all the different settings/game scenarios out there. You can end up rolling 10 000+ dice in a single game, or more.

lt.Futt wrote:

Fruitcake wrote:Futt, I noticed you responded to my post in the official dice bitch thread with much the same kind of waspish attitude you show where.

My responding to you are pretty much in your spirit. Don't you think? It's right back in your face. Right.Back.In.Your.Face. And you gotta live with that.

This has nothing to do with The SoC. You're a complete ignorant when it comes to The SoC and the job they do. The SoC is a official cc social group. Does no more harm than any social group or any clan or player. The SoC are suppose to teach the basics but The SoC students get much more than the basics. You don't have to be the best to teach others. You need to know the basics and you need to be willing to teach and to help others.

Not everybody need teaching from The SoC. It's an offer just.

Even though you complete miss the target attacking The SoC, you're not that far out the SoC topic as you are the topic for the thread.

I am unable to see where I have attacked the SoC. I was merely making the observation that you have something of a belligerent attitude that seems to get worse if somebody disagrees with you, or criticises you in any way.

You are, of course, welcome to your opinions as we all are.