Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon May 11, 2009 11:19 pm**

Gilligan wrote:Why is everyone searching my old posts?!

So
get crackin
start posting ur first post, or an early post of someone that makes them look dumb
ill start

a.sub wrote:i know this isnt the right format but i had a question about contacting a player outside of the game to sync playing times. i am currently in a triples freestyle game in which the opposing team syncs up so they all play at the same time. it gives them an unfair advantage since my team cannot do that (we are in different countries.) i do not know if this is against the rules but i think it should be because it IS giving them an unfair advantage, and it has been repeated.

The people in question are
Tjoputra
Pickboyz
michaelrwong

if they are allowed to get away with this, can we start a forum where we post the names of ppl who do this so other ppl that dont want to deal with their near cheating style can put them on their ignore list?

-Adith

lol i do that now
team up on ppl via chat :lol:

Posted: **Mon May 11, 2009 11:51 pm**

Who wouldn't!!! :roll:

Posted: **Tue May 12, 2009 12:45 am**

ppgangster wrote:Who wouldn't!!!

i was a cook >900 in my defense lol

Posted: **Tue May 12, 2009 4:46 am**

Here is one I find funny from a clan mate of mine.

Thread title: Re: Battle of the N00bs 4 [FULL] but reserves are welcome

Foxglove wrote:I'd like in please!

Yeah that really works.. 2520 score now.. LOL

Taken from your tournament post on Nov 14th 2008

a.sub wrote:private 1st class to Corporal 1st Class
Stephen Wayne
LympcSwmmr
Zorbas
TheBlackWolf
Acores2005
John Price
Hanksy
Zono
Foxglove
Johnny Rockets

Posted: **Tue May 12, 2009 7:12 am**

it was not a post but when i first joined i was in live chat asking how to post a reply and join a tournament.

Posted: **Tue May 12, 2009 7:26 am**

none of my early ones are interesting

most of them are discussing football or arguing with someone called jamie about soccer Vs football :oops:

i wasnt even interesting in wot i did :lol:

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 2:27 pm**

my first post, from March 1, 2007.

whitestazn88 wrote:i know in real risk, you have to trade in at 6 cards, is that the rule in conquer club as well?

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 2:28 pm**

and i didn't even post that Q in Q&A... tsk tsk

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 2:48 pm**

My first public post :

ManBungalow wrote:How about a "High Rankers Medal"?
Anyone who's ever been in say the top 100 gets this medal
Should be awarded to encourage more games and better play

It sounds reasonably sane :-^

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 4:11 pm**

AndyDufresne wrote:This site is a nice little filler between the few times my friends I and play in person. I'm glad to have chanced upon it, and also to have gotten off on the right foot. I look forward to playing many people, and trying my hand in doubles. 'til then,

--Andy Dufresne

His first post was map related. However this is his second post. Several years later and he's played a grand total of 39 doubles.

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 4:16 pm**

Here is mine:

Optimus Prime wrote:I'm a little confused as to why players get to have bonus armies if they miss their turn. I understand that there are folks who accidentally miss turns, but there are those out there trying to get the advantage by missing a turn and then trading in cards at the same time. Why is this the way this works? I'm just curious. Seems like they shouldn't get extra armies, that might eliminate some of turns that are missed on purpose? Has anyone else thought about this?

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 4:28 pm**

Optimus Prime wrote:Here is mine:

Optimus Prime wrote:I'm a little confused as to why players get to have bonus armies if they miss their turn. I understand that there are folks who accidentally miss turns, but there are those out there trying to get the advantage by missing a turn and then trading in cards at the same time. Why is this the way this works? I'm just curious. Seems like they shouldn't get extra armies, that might eliminate some of turns that are missed on purpose? Has anyone else thought about this?

We can see from that post that you always had managerial potential here.

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 4:29 pm**

Haha, oddly enough my first post is on the same subject.

"I'm gonna be gone on vacation for a couple days, and currently I hold a continent.

Assumimg that I no longer hold the continent after missing 2 rounds, do I get my 3 reinforcements multiplied by 3 and get the continent bonus for the rounds I held it, or do i just get the 3 reinforcements x 3."

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 4:29 pm**

My first one was just me stating my birthday. I like my 5th/6th one though:

And you could all be retarded, there's another great option

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2009 4:34 pm**

My first was in suggestions & bug...

Postby demonfork » Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:22 pm
You should add "unlucky" & "lucky" to the list of explanatory tags in the ratings section

Without using the form of course

Posted: **Sat May 16, 2009 12:59 pm**

I don't want to see this thread die so here is sjnap's first post :

sjnap wrote:Nice...formul 1...i am a hughe Ferrari fan

so Ferrari please

Posted: **Sat May 16, 2009 1:35 pm**

Optimus Prime wrote:Here is mine:

Optimus Prime wrote:I'm a little confused as to why players get to have bonus armies if they miss their turn. I understand that there are folks who accidentally miss turns, but there are those out there trying to get the advantage by missing a turn and then trading in cards at the same time. Why is this the way this works? I'm just curious. Seems like they shouldn't get extra armies, that might eliminate some of turns that are missed on purpose? Has anyone else thought about this?

This guy was born to be a mod :lol:

Anyway, here's mine. It's not very interesting, except that it reminds me that I used to have too much time to check my games. : )

Georgerx7di wrote:I too would like to see a 12 hour time option for taking your turn, for players who check they're games more than once a day.

Posted: **Sat May 16, 2009 5:19 pm**

My first post was in FLAME WARS.....still missing in action, just like the FLAME WARS forum.

Posted: **Sat May 16, 2009 5:24 pm**

Subject: who will win the mod vs spammers game

owenshooter wrote:i voted after it was well decided... but i always knew it in my heart...-0

there are some doozies from my first foray into the forums, but this one came up first...-0

Posted: **Sat May 16, 2009 7:19 pm**

i had to put brett's up, it is just a little weird and funky thread that is still funny... one of vace coopers map attempts that made the foundry nerds heads explode. not quite as good as his vomit map, but still pretty gosh darn hilarious:

Subject: Super cool map.... By: Vace Cooper [Abandoned]

jbrettlip wrote:This is truly the height of comedy. Well done, Vace.

Posted: **Sat May 16, 2009 7:32 pm**

Here's me...

Serbia wrote:I'm going with the Patriots. Partly because I think Indy's going to choke, and by Indy, I mean mostly Manning. In fact, had the Colts D played like they played all season, they wouldn't have gotten by Baltimore. I'd like to see the Saints win, because they haven't yet, and while I think they'll get by the Bears, I just think that if the Pats do make it to the Super Bowl, they'll win it for the fourth time. I mean really, was anyone really surprised that Brady led the team on that scoring drive at the end of the first half, and then again in the fourth, trailing by 8? Sure, he got a HUGE break with that interception-fumble-recovery play, but given the second chance, he made it happen again.

Conquer Club

First Post

First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post

Re: First Post