Page 1 of 4

rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:33 pm
by Caymanmew
i beleave it is not nice have a rank of cook. it is not anice feeling to think you are so low you are not eveing in a army rank. i think the lowest should be cadet.

what do you think?

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:37 pm
by JoshyBoy
Wow this is one pointless topic.

Oh well, might as well give my input. :roll:

I don't see what the problem is with having the rank of cook. But if your going to get rid of it you might as well throw cadet out as well.

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:41 pm
by obliterationX
To be honest, we need lower than Cook, lol.

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:42 pm
by JoshyBoy
obliterationX wrote:To be honest, we need lower than Cook, lol.


What like chambermaid or something? :lol:

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:47 pm
by ManBungalow
JoshyBoy wrote:
obliterationX wrote:To be honest, we need lower than Cook, lol.


What like chambermaid or something? :lol:

Conscientious objector ?

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:48 pm
by JoshyBoy
Was thinking maybe "Cabin boy"? lol

Oh and they have Cooks in the army caymanmew. :D

Admit it your just like me. Sitting on CC all the time, getting bored and starting up new topics just to give you something to do :lol:

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:51 pm
by Shatners Bassoon
Rank of cook?

boiled cabbage?

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:58 pm
by JoshyBoy
Ok in all fairness if you play CC regularly and your the rank of cook on like a permanent basis then you must be pretty shit (pardon the language lol) and deserve to wear that hat of shame. ;)

Like ObliterationX said we actually need lower... to show up the ridiculously shocking players.

:lol: =D>

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 5:37 pm
by Caymanmew
JoshyBoy wrote:Admit it your just like me. Sitting on CC all the time, getting bored and starting up new topics just to give you something to do :lol:


ya ok it true but maby caben boy would be a good rank

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 5:42 pm
by owenshooter
i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 5:47 pm
by Woodruff
caymanmew wrote:i beleave it is not nice have a rank of cook. it is not anice feeling to think you are so low you are not eveing in a army rank. i think the lowest should be cadet.
what do you think?


In my opinion, "last is last"...what you call it is irrelevant. If someone feels badly because they're at the rank of cook, then they'll feel equally badly when they're at the rank of cadet (if it's the bottom rank).

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 6:06 pm
by redhawk92
should be secretary bellow cook :D

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:55 pm
by Georgerx7di
kylegraves1 wrote:should be secretary bellow cook :D


No, secretaries are usually below the guy in charge. Unless he's really faithful. :D

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:02 pm
by The Neon Peon
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

I have never been to cook. :(

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:09 pm
by djt5483
The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

I have never been to cook. :(

ive never been a cook either, i dont think ive ever been below 900

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:09 pm
by a.sub
The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

I have never been to cook. :(

just point dump to me and u wont ever have to feel that way again :D

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:10 pm
by EagleofGreenErth
One has to try hard to get to cook... my 1000+ point dump only got me to lieut!

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:12 pm
by the.killing.44
I was cook for ~3 minutes I think. Then I won a speeder.

.44

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:18 pm
by The Neon Peon
a.sub wrote:
The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

I have never been to cook. :(

just point dump to me and u wont ever have to feel that way again :D

It might be my goal to get to cook for 3 months now, but I am still planning on trying to do it while doing my best to win every game.

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:19 pm
by djt5483
the only time i was even close, the rank of cook didnt exist. 1v1 didnt exist and speed games didnt exist lol

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 11:41 pm
by sully800
djt5483 wrote:
The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

I have never been to cook. :(

ive never been a cook either, i dont think ive ever been below 900


Never been below 1000 and never will be.

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 4:05 am
by djt5483
sully800 wrote:
djt5483 wrote:
The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

I have never been to cook. :(

ive never been a cook either, i dont think ive ever been below 900


Never been below 1000 and never will be.

i lost my first 3 games then i started winnin

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 5:08 am
by demonfork
The rank below baker should be jizz mopper

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... z%20mopper

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 5:11 am
by JoshyBoy
demonfork wrote:The rank below baker should be jizz mopper

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... z%20mopper


:lol: :lol: =D> =D>

Re: rank of cook

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 5:24 am
by karelpietertje
demonfork wrote:The rank below baker should be jizz mopper

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... z%20mopper


hehe nice one. I dont know if they have Jizz Moppers in the army though :lol:

this topic got me thinking though. not in the way it's meant, feeling sorry for the cooks, but wondering if we should have a lower rank.
I think so. when I play a cook, its quite a big difference between a 799 point cook and a 100 point cook. mind, that's 600 points, but relatively it's 800% difference, which means a lot for point distribution after a game.

I say there should be a new rank below 500.
we should have a brainstorming contest how to name it.
first option: replace 'cook' with janitor, and have everybody beneath 500 be a cook.

of course this will raise debate on what is considered lower, a cook or a janitor? :lol: