Conquer Club

simply vote and post a quick snippet to keep the thread alive
i wanna see this over time, and you can change your vote as time goes on

the approval percent is as follows
(4a+3b+2c+d)/(4a+4b+4c+4d+4e)
a= # off people that voted for a 4
b= # off people that voted for a 3
c= # off people that voted for a 2
d= # off people that voted for a 1
e= # off people that voted for a 0

Chart over time
Day#.........Approval%
1.............70.2%
2.............73.1%
3.............73.2%
4.............73.2%
5.............74.0%
6.............
7.............
8.............
9.............
10.............

a.sub wrote:THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO DISCUSS YOUR OPINIONS ON MODS

I firmly believe that every mod on here is very serious about trying to make Conquer Club a better, more enjoyable place for everyone. However, I believe there is too much inconsistency, based on the personal views of the moderators on what constitutes "too far".

Woodruff wrote:

a.sub wrote:THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO DISCUSS YOUR OPINIONS ON MODS

I firmly believe that every mod on here is very serious about trying to make Conquer Club a better, more enjoyable place for everyone. However, I believe there is too much inconsistency, based on the personal views of the moderators on what constitutes "too far".

Agreed, but instead of "too far" I'd say biased.

Which mods, are you including volunteers?

The spread of mods is just too big IMO. It's been said before, and it's worth reiterating. Tourneys and maps wouldn't work without the TDs and CAs, respectively. Also, the Hunters have the tools that are most of the time clinchers on cases. So those three must have high ratings in function (attitude, etc. is a different matter) to even be there. But judging the global and regular forum-specific mods is an entirely subjective matter, so you'd have to multiple polls: first for attitude and perspective and another for the way they operate; and also one for the directly pro-CC causes (maps, tourneys, multis) and the forum-modding things.

.44

the.killing.44 wrote:The spread of mods is just too big IMO. It's been said before, and it's worth reiterating. Tourneys and maps wouldn't work without the TDs and CAs, respectively. Also, the Hunters have the tools that are most of the time clinchers on cases. So those three must have high ratings in function (attitude, etc. is a different matter) to even be there. But judging the global and regular forum-specific mods is an entirely subjective matter, so you'd have to multiple polls: first for attitude and perspective and another for the way they operate; and also one for the directly pro-CC causes (maps, tourneys, multis) and the forum-modding things.

.44

i stand by whatever 44 said! and will say!

Do Chat mods count for anything?


.....I didn't think so

InsomniaRed wrote:Do Chat mods count for anything?


.....I didn't think so

awwww dont worry im sure kill was just kidding

jpcloet wrote:Which mods, are you including volunteers?

I am, yes. Although mostly the forum moderators. And I don't mean this to be a slam on them or anything...I rated them a 3. I think they're doing a generally decent job. I just think more consistency between them is needed.

a.sub wrote:THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO DISCUSS YOUR OPINIONS ON MODS

Well that will fail miserably...

jpcloet wrote:Which mods, are you including volunteers?

You have a big tag saying "moderator" below your name, I'd guess that's a hint.

Aww, I click on this thinking we get to rate each mod individually...

Oh yeah, and why not just average the votes and multiply by 25?

jpcloet wrote:Which mods, are you including volunteers?

which is well... the majority of us "mods" LOL

john9blue wrote:Aww, I click on this thinking we get to rate each mod individually...

Oh yeah, and why not just average the votes and multiply by 25?

my equation is simply the sum of the points divided by the total number of points possible (if everyone voted 4s) so it is the average

So this is just for mods in general, not a specific group of mods...right?

If it's for in general, I'm giving us a 3...there's always room for improvement. Even though we're probably the best right now than we've been in a long time (possibly the best we've ever been), we'll never be the highest rating possible...simply because, like I said, there's always room for us to improve.

PS - Red, no...you don't just kidding

Internet Connection for a month - $35
Premium membership for a year - $25
Watching mods continually ban people like owenshooter and lock numerous threads whilst taking away General Stoneham's beloved Flame Wars - PRICELESS!!!

Keep it up mods. You make this site.

jpcloet wrote:Which mods, are you including volunteers?

aren't all mods volunteers?

jpcloet wrote:Which mods, are you including volunteers?

All, since I'm not sure where you fall under jp, great job.

do admins make any money for there services?

What's the point of updating this every day, when we can't change our votes?

Timminz wrote:What's the point of updating this every day, when we can't change our votes?

you can change your votes
at least its letting me

I can't.

Not sure if this counts as a mod action, but Natewolfman (tourney organizer) is spamming people with links to his 'my brute' page...

Natewolfman wrote:Friend just sent me this site, its quite addictive lol, Click on the link below and make a character to fight mine, take a look Ive got 3 main characters, choose any one of them to check out

http://natewolfman.mybrute.com

http://tiberon-lan.mybrute.com

http://yuna-s-team.mybrute.com

Can anyone other than the OP change their vote?

the.killing.44 wrote:The spread of mods is just too big IMO.

.44

Big Brother is watching.

Nice job using the FML app icon for your avatar, I giggled.