Conquer Club

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=5025783

Reaper1818 wins 7v3 advances, 6v3, advances, 5v3, advances, 4v3, advances, 3v1, advances, 2v1 . . .

He killed 14 armies with 0 losses, all the rolls were 3 dice vs 2 dice, except a 2 dice vs 1, and a 1 dice vs 1.

Nice turn, eh?

nice dice

get used to it, cc dice are crap! today Ive won 12vs15 losing 1, defense got seven 1s in 15 dice, how fair was that?

The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

I suggested this years ago.


--Andy

AndyDufresne wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

I suggested this years ago.


--Andy

That may be the case, but sometimes it just takes someone with some real clout to get the ball rolling.

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Yeah but someone could type in a fake number, like they rolled 1,2,4 and the dude says he rolled 4, 5, 6.

Randy123 wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Yeah but someone could type in a fake number, like they rolled 1,2,4 and the dude says he rolled 4, 5, 6.

Please tell me your not serious Randy...???
.
.
.
.
i mean to suggest someone would deliberatly lie... with the intention of cheating ...i simply wont hear of it..!

Randy123 wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Yeah but someone could type in a fake number, like they rolled 1,2,4 and the dude says he rolled 4, 5, 6.

Huh, he's right - I'd never thought of that

Timminz wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

I suggested this years ago.


--Andy

That may be the case, but sometimes it just takes someone with some real clout to get the ball rolling.

Randy123 wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Yeah but someone could type in a fake number, like they rolled 1,2,4 and the dude says he rolled 4, 5, 6.

Randy you are a genius. I can't believe that no one else realized this. As a solution we should have players sign an honesty contract, stating that they will not lie about their dice. And if they do lie, they must report themselves to the mods so that they can be punished.

See, problem fixed.

Georgerx7di wrote:

Randy123 wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Yeah but someone could type in a fake number, like they rolled 1,2,4 and the dude says he rolled 4, 5, 6.

Randy you are a genius. I can't believe that no one else realized this. As a solution we should have players sign an honesty contract, stating that they will not lie about their dice. And if they do lie, they must report themselves to the mods so that they can be punished.

See, problem fixed.

um... hello!? What if the honesty contract is written in disappearing ink? The only way to make a bound agreement online is to go to register on BloodOath.com and they will send you a blood sampling kit. Prick your finger and apply the blood to the Oath card and then return the kit by registed mail to BloodOath.com. They will match the Oath card with the Oath card of the person you are committed to a blood oath with and then adhere them together with tape and dip them in a bath of molten copper. The copperized blood oath card will be buried for all eternity under the sea floor.

mibi wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:

Randy123 wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Yeah but someone could type in a fake number, like they rolled 1,2,4 and the dude says he rolled 4, 5, 6.

Randy you are a genius. I can't believe that no one else realized this. As a solution we should have players sign an honesty contract, stating that they will not lie about their dice. And if they do lie, they must report themselves to the mods so that they can be punished.

See, problem fixed.

um... hello!? What if the honesty contract is written in disappearing ink? The only way to make a bound agreement online is to go to register on BloodOath.com and they will send you a blood sampling kit. Prick your finger and apply the blood to the Oath card and then return the kit by registed mail to BloodOath.com. They will match the Oath card with the Oath card of the person you are committed to a blood oath with and then adhere them together with tape and dip them in a bath of molten copper. The copperized blood oath card will be buried for all eternity under the sea floor.

You guys are over thinking this. If anyone thinks someone is lying about their roll then we can simply ask them to take a picture of it and send it to CC. Man you guys think too much.

Photoshop, duuuuuh!

They should just mail the dice in with a little marker showing the side that came up. If they lied they pay the post, if they didn't the accuser pays. Simple!

Randy123 wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Yeah but someone could type in a fake number, like they rolled 1,2,4 and the dude says he rolled 4, 5, 6.

Can we all slap our foreheads in unison?

Randy123 is the kind of inteligent, quick thinking, witty guy who I think would make an outstanding moderator. I really, really hope they will reopen nominations so I can nominate Randy123. Randy, please tell me you are working for the IRS or DMV where you can work alongside others who are filled with you wit, cunning, and god given intellect. I truly believe that Randy posseses many qualities that make him worthy of becoming a moderator on CC. @Lack- you really are missing out by not having somebody with the stature such as Randy123 on your staff.

Pimp

The Roll-o-Matic seemed to have spare capacity. Maybe CC can work out a deal with them to get rolls.

sully800 wrote:http://gamesbyemail.com/News/DiceOMatic

Next year's premium income should go to a project like that!

Randy123 wrote:

Timminz wrote:The obvious solution is to let us roll our own dice, for real, and then type in the results. Otherwise there's no guarantee that the dice are working like real dice would.

Yeah but someone could type in a fake number, like they rolled 1,2,4 and the dude says he rolled 4, 5, 6.

Oh my god, shocker. D'oh!