Page 1 of 2
1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:02 pm
by leolou2
dont invite me im tired of em to much luck and i have won my share but im done
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:27 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
too bad. you were next on my list to invite

Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:58 pm
by targetman377
dang i was just going to send one
you are you again???
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:54 pm
by owenshooter
leolou2 wrote:dont invite me im tired of em to much luck and i have won my share but im done
you obviously used them to skyrocket your rank... thank goodness i avoided being farmed by you... i'm shocked that you never ended up in C&A with your stellar/supreme 1v1 abilities...-0
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:39 pm
by Timminz
I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:11 pm
by leolou2
its getting old or i'm bored with it i like multi standard but 1 v 1 is pure luck of course you get in a standard game and all pick on you its not fun either sorry maybe later
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:13 pm
by leolou2
leolou2 wrote:its getting old or i'm bored with it i like multi standard but 1 v 1 is pure luck of course you get in a standard game and all pick on you its not fun either sorry maybe later
if you cant beat em kill kill kill em
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:19 pm
by Timminz
If it's pure luck, wouldn't everyone win approximately 50% of their 1v1 games?
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:49 pm
by redhawk92
Timminz wrote:If it's pure luck, wouldn't everyone win approximately 50% of their 1v1 games?
yes
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:14 am
by owenshooter
leolou2 wrote:leolou2 wrote:its getting old or i'm bored with it i like multi standard but 1 v 1 is pure luck of course you get in a standard game and all pick on you its not fun either sorry maybe later
if you cant beat em kill kill kill em
wait, did he really just quote himself? and truly, as timminz says, if it is pure luck shouldn't you win 50 percent or higher?-0
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:23 am
by oVo
Timminz wrote:If it's pure luck, wouldn't everyone win approximately 50% of their 1v1 games?
Only if you're lucky and go first half the games.
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:04 am
by Supermarioluigi
I hate 1v1
...I've only played 10 of them in my entire CC career.
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:16 am
by AAFitz
Pure luck indeed. I get to win 64% of them, and 75% or so on world. The dice just plain love me.

Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:34 am
by targetman377
AAFitz wrote:Pure luck indeed. I get to win 64% of them, and 75% or so on world. The dice just plain love me.

note do not play this guy one on one unless you want your score to go down
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:10 pm
by djt5483
ive won 68% out of like 1500 1v1 games, but im -5000 in score
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:10 pm
by leolou2
damn if i'd know djt5483 was so hot i'd join all her games 1 v 1 lol

f course noretreat would be pissed

Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:31 pm
by whitestazn88
Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:49 pm
by Timminz
whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Gee, you really think 33% is too low? Fine. What do you think makes a decent 1v1 player?
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:25 pm
by owenshooter
whitestazn88 wrote:map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
i bet you'd just love for timminz to do that to you... how old are you now? is that even legal where you live?-0
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:18 pm
by whitestazn88
Timminz wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Gee, you really think 33% is too low? Fine. What do you think makes a decent 1v1 player?
it certainly depends on what type of game you're playing, but i think a percentage like 33% is sub-par, especially if you take into account random luck.
if you were playing games with similar ranks on maps that both parties are not completely new to, i'd say 40% is decent, 50% is good, 60% exceeds expectations, 70% excellent... or something like that.
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:19 pm
by whitestazn88
owenshooter wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
i bet you'd just love for timminz to do that to you... how old are you now? is that even legal where you live?-0
and ps. sorry to double post, but i felt that this needed its own space... what does that even mean?
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:20 pm
by Timminz
whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Gee, you really think 33% is too low? Fine. What do you think makes a decent 1v1 player?
it certainly depends on what type of game you're playing, but i think a percentage like 33% is sub-par, especially if you take into account random luck.
if you were playing games with similar ranks on maps that both parties are not completely new to, i'd say 40% is decent, 50% is good, 60% exceeds expectations, 70% excellent... or something like that.
So, you wouldn't consider 50% to be "average"?
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:32 pm
by whitestazn88
Timminz wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Gee, you really think 33% is too low? Fine. What do you think makes a decent 1v1 player?
it certainly depends on what type of game you're playing, but i think a percentage like 33% is sub-par, especially if you take into account random luck.
if you were playing games with similar ranks on maps that both parties are not completely new to, i'd say 40% is decent, 50% is good, 60% exceeds expectations, 70% excellent... or something like that.
So, you wouldn't consider 50% to be "average"?
well when you say decent, i would equate that to being average. i think being able to win half your games is better than that because of randomness in the dice and drops doesn't mean that you'll get good dice and drops 50% of the time, so you still have to be able to win a game based on strategy more often than not
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:33 pm
by Timminz
So, have you figured out why I picked 33%, when the OP wins 32%?
Re: 1 v 1 games

Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:40 pm
by Serbia
Timminz wrote:So, have you figured out why I picked 33%, when the OP wins 32%?
ooh ooh, pick me, pick me, I know this one!