Conquer Club

Just saw this, pretty interesting.

# Username Score [...] Rank
1 karelpietertje 5682 [...] Conqueror 4.7
2 King_Herpes 5682 [...] Field Marshal 4.7

Forgive me for not bothering to take a screen dump, but if in doubt, just trust me...

Will be interesting to see how they will position themselves before the next update.

alstergren wrote:Just saw this, pretty interesting.

# Username Score [...] Rank
1 karelpietertje 5682 [...] Conqueror 4.7
2 King_Herpes 5682 [...] Field Marshal 4.7

Forgive me for not bothering to take a screen dump, but if in doubt, just trust me...

Will be interesting to see how they will position themselves before the next update.

lol, karel is only ahead because hes played more game

djt5483 wrote:lol, karel is only ahead because hes played more game

Really, so that is the tie-breaker? Thought it was because he was ahead (i.e. preference given to the incumbent).

1 karelpietertje
Games Completed: 5243
Games Won: 3280 (63%)

2 King_Herpes
Games Completed: 4553
Games Won: 3603 (79%)

I would personally think that number of games won would be a more reasonable tie-breaker in that case. But, all in all, giving preference to the incumbent seems fairer.

Hmm, could've sworn win percentage was the tie-breaker... Oh, well

alstergren wrote:

djt5483 wrote:lol, karel is only ahead because hes played more game

Really, so that is the tie-breaker? Thought it was because he was ahead (i.e. preference given to the incumbent).

1 karelpietertje
Games Completed: 5243
Games Won: 3280 (63%)

2 King_Herpes
Games Completed: 4553
Games Won: 3603 (79%)

I would personally think that number of games won would be a more reasonable tie-breaker in that case. But, all in all, giving preference to the incumbent seems fairer.

yea if you look at every tie on the scoreboard its always the person with the most games played ahead

damn thats insane...

bleutofu wrote:Hmm, could've sworn win percentage was the tie-breaker... Oh, well

i was under this impression also...

then at 0 B.C.(0 years before conquerclub ), players all had the score 1000 and the no. of games 0. Who would be conqueror?

jleonnn wrote:then at 0 B.C.(0 years before conquerclub ), players all had the score 1000 and the no. of games 0. Who would be conqueror?

Your mom.

*sigh* why is that (know I will regret asking this)

Because her body is bangin' and her face is hot too.

jleonnn wrote:then at 0 B.C.(0 years before conquerclub ), players all had the score 1000 and the no. of games 0. Who would be conqueror?

Well. Actually, at first it took a while for people to raise their score/rank. Initially, the rank General was the top rank, you needed 5000 points to get it I think, but it was pretty quickly changed to 3000 points. The rank Conqueror came a bit later (for the no 1 spot).

when I saw that I got exactly the 5 points difference between me and herps in a game, I expected him to be the conqueror still; I thought it was about how many games you have won, which is a better one than games imo...
this is not only in conqueror draws though... isn't it in all cases where 2 players have an equal score?

karelpietertje wrote:when I saw that I got exactly the 5 points difference between me and herps in a game, I expected him to be the conqueror still; I thought it was about how many games you have won, which is a better one than games imo...
this is not only in conqueror draws though... isn't it in all cases where 2 players have an equal score?

no, its games played... i found this one to show you
76 tyche73 3058 3371 1470 (44%) Brigadier Brigadier 4.8 Ireland Ireland
77 Blind Date 3058 2563 1692 (66%) Brigadier Brigadier 4.9 United States United States