Conquer Club

what do you think of teams with only high ranks. you think this is fair or should these people play more on teams where ranks are lower and spread out evenly in a team????

perfectly fair, no one makes u join a game, besides i prefer to play higher ranked teams, its a risk reward kinda thing

azezzo wrote:perfectly fair, no one makes u join a game, besides i prefer to play higher ranked teams, its a risk reward kinda thing

but at the same time i think there should be some games option that make the ranks get evenly split up.

targetman377 wrote:

azezzo wrote:perfectly fair, no one makes u join a game, besides i prefer to play higher ranked teams, its a risk reward kinda thing

but at the same time i think there should be some games option that make the ranks get evenly split up.

No.

pmchugh wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

azezzo wrote:perfectly fair, no one makes u join a game, besides i prefer to play higher ranked teams, its a risk reward kinda thing

but at the same time i think there should be some games option that make the ranks get evenly split up.

No.

there should not be that option would that not make it an interesting game forcing the teams to be even in rank. making the team games harder and more enjoyable for every player.

targetman377 wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

azezzo wrote:perfectly fair, no one makes u join a game, besides i prefer to play higher ranked teams, its a risk reward kinda thing

but at the same time i think there should be some games option that make the ranks get evenly split up.

No.

there should not be that option would that not make it an interesting game forcing the teams to be even in rank. making the team games harder and more enjoyable for every player.

I don't know how many people would use this, I certainly wouldn't. Most high ranked players will only play in thier own teams and that is why they are high ranked. I don't see many high rankers playing thi so it knd of defeats the purpose.

It's actually a bad idea for a high rank to only play with high ranks. For example, four Generals only play quads will lose points overall even if they are far and away better than the competition. It's better to partner low ranks like Majors to balance out scores .

It would be cool so see how many points you've made with your partner(s)

prismsaber wrote:It's actually a bad idea for a high rank to only play with high ranks. For example, four Generals only play quads will lose points overall even if they are far and away better than the competition. It's better to partner low ranks like Majors to balance out scores .

ya thats why kill plays with me..i bring his score down...lol
that and i prolly play well above my rank

prismsaber wrote:It's actually a bad idea for a high rank to only play with high ranks. For example, four Generals only play quads will lose points overall even if they are far and away better than the competition. It's better to partner low ranks like Majors to balance out scores .

Yes but not random majors, some are dumb. They pick majors who are good players, or those who will listen to what they say. And majors are high ranks to some people

His idea is to pair people up according to rank once you have joined a game which no high rankers will do incase they get stuck with incompetant players.

so it would not be a good idea then for you so that when the game starts it evenaly distributes the rank among them if you wanted. would anyone use that??

targetman377 wrote:so it would not be a good idea then for you so that when the game starts it evenaly distributes the rank among them if you wanted. would anyone use that??

If I wanted to randomly play team games with lower ranks, wouldn't I just join teams that have lower ranks on them?

Horrible idea... I earned my rank with the same guys I started playing on here with. Not my fault you can't find a good partner or two...-0

ok what i am here is that you guys think this is a bad idea. cause you all got your high rank from playing like this? if you wanted to improve your game would it not be wise to do this??? would it not be a challenge or are u guys too afraid to do something different

targetman377 wrote:ok what i am here is that you guys think this is a bad idea. cause you all got your high rank from playing like this? if you wanted to improve your game would it not be wise to do this??? would it not be a challenge or are u guys too afraid to do something different

The only challenge in it is whether or not noob partners listen to orders or not. Better to just play with people you know.

targetman377 wrote:ok what i am here is that you guys think this is a bad idea. cause you all got your high rank from playing like this? if you wanted to improve your game would it not be wise to do this??? would it not be a challenge or are u guys too afraid to do something different

nothing more frustrating than playing a team game with a team mate who wont play as a team member, i can safely say that i will never play a team game with team mates i dont know. as far as improving my game, i prefer to play against higher ranks, suggest you get 2 partners u trust and game search the usa map for triples and take on some colonels or higher, basic map no trickery.

I would rather play a team of all high ranks. I steal...I mean earn more points that way.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I would rather play a team of all high ranks. I steal...I mean earn more points that way.

Guess you learned your lesson recently when you tried to tangle with me and LV!!! Ha!!!-0

owenshooter wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I would rather play a team of all high ranks. I steal...I mean earn more points that way.

Guess you learned your lesson recently when you tried to tangle with me and LV!!! Ha!!!-0

He isn't the only one

owenshooter wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I would rather play a team of all high ranks. I steal...I mean earn more points that way.

Guess you learned your lesson recently when you tried to tangle with me and LV!!! Ha!!!-0

im a terrible partner remember

owenshooter wrote:Horrible idea... I earned my rank with the same guys I started playing on here with. Not my fault you can't find a good partner or two...-0

Post reported due to:

1. The adjective 'horrible'. I think a different word might have been less offensive here...how about 'interesting'? Much more neutral, FAR less likely to upset anyone!

2. Being a touch self-congratulatory as well as also implying that the OP is 'friends-deficient'. One must always be aware of the emotional stresses involved in being lonely and I don't think it is appropriate to taunt a person for (possibly!) lacking in some basic social skills.

I think flaming is just evil,

Mr (I love you all equally) C

targetman377 wrote:what do you think of teams with only high ranks. you think this is fair or should these people play more on teams where ranks are lower and spread out evenly in a team????

It kind of suxes been a team with high ranks, in the rare event that you lose, you stand to lose big points, unless the opposing team is of similar rank.

High ranked teams exist because

A) You like to play with people that you trust to make the right decisions and know how to play.
B) Generally but not always high ranked people have played more team games
C) It is hard to find someone that communicates and thinks properly of a lower rank. When you do you play with them as much as possible(is a points positive experience), then if they are even half as good as you think they could be, they make LT within 3wks or so.

There is a points risk to lower ranks if they are on the same team as a high ranked players. I generally play on teams with people of a similar rank, or with clan brothers/sisters who have proved themselves.