Page 1 of 1

Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:55 am
by a.sub
Which do you like better?
im caught between the two but as of now im still going to have to go with world cities, even though i wont vote
PS this poll makes the assumption that you can only have 1 map

WORLD CITIES
CLASSIC REVAMP

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:21 am
by Army of GOD
Would the new-classic replace the classic shapes?

If yes, then new-classic.

If no, then World Cities.

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:22 am
by a.sub
Army of GOD wrote:Would the new-classic replace the classic shapes?

If yes, then new-classic.

If no, then World Cities.

yes it would

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:24 am
by Army of GOD
a.sub wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:Would the new-classic replace the classic shapes?

If yes, then new-classic.

If no, then World Cities.

yes it would


Then it's a yes! =D>

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:55 am
by angola
In theory I like World Cities, but the Pacific Ocean as the middle bothers me.

It would take me awhile to get use to that.

I dig it as the new classic.

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:07 pm
by Georgerx7di
Classic revamp looks like exact same game play as classic. I don't think (I could be wrong) that game play is the same on world cities. So I say, make them both. Classic revamp can take over for shapes, (keep art, we're getting tired of change), and world cities can just be a new map.

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:12 pm
by pimphawks70
a.sub wrote:Which do you like better?
im caught between the two but as of now im still going to have to go with world cities, even though i wont vote
PS this poll makes the assumption that you can only have 1 map

WORLD CITIES
CLASSIC REVAMP


Sorry but could you explain the differences?

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:14 am
by a.sub
pimphawks70 wrote:
a.sub wrote:Which do you like better?
im caught between the two but as of now im still going to have to go with world cities, even though i wont vote
PS this poll makes the assumption that you can only have 1 map

WORLD CITIES
CLASSIC REVAMP


Sorry but could you explain the differences?


they both use the same concept of using cities instead of countries, classic revamp uses the classic's game play while world cities was completely different, it even used an atlantic split

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:01 pm
by spiesr
Actually, they both have the exact same gameplay. The only difference is that on World Cities South America is the new Oceania, North America is the new Asia, and so on...

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:27 pm
by a.sub
spiesr wrote:Actually, they both have the exact same gameplay. The only difference is that on World Cities South America is the new Oceania, North America is the new Asia, and so on...

oh really? i didnt actually know that

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:40 pm
by niMic
Must say I prefer the Classic Revamp.

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:21 pm
by targetman377
i like both what do i do

Re: Neo-Classic vs World Cities

PostPosted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:50 pm
by sully800
With the revamp possibility finally in the works, World Cities will now go the the recycling bin. They are indeed the same gameplay (though under different bonus region labels) and the theme/graphics is virtually identical. World Cities was just a launching pad for what has now become the revamp.