Conquer Club

...

I am totally in agreement with your viewpoint on this issue, but,

This poll seems kind of pointless to me. This is like starting a poll,
"How much should premium cost?"
"How many hours a day should Lack spend programming updates for the site?"
"Should the mods be paid for their services?"

72o wrote:I am totally in agreement with your viewpoint on this issue, but,

This poll seems kind of pointless to me. This is like starting a poll,
"How much should premium cost?"
"How many hours a day should Lack spend programming updates for the site?"
"Should the mods be paid for their services?"

I kind of disagree 72. This is something that admin could change without loosing much. I can't imagine that there are that many multi's buying back. So I don't think that the loss of that income would be something would significantly impact CC's income. I could be wrong, but if I'm right, then the decision could be made with little consequences.

If CC admin sees that people feel strong about this, they may change it. However, seeing how many votes there are, and the spread, perhaps most of the people on the site don't feel very strongly about it.

Georgerx7di wrote:

72o wrote:I am totally in agreement with your viewpoint on this issue, but,

This poll seems kind of pointless to me. This is like starting a poll,
"How much should premium cost?"
"How many hours a day should Lack spend programming updates for the site?"
"Should the mods be paid for their services?"

I kind of disagree 72. This is something that admin could change without loosing much. I can't imagine that there are that many multi's buying back. So I don't think that the loss of that income would be something would significantly impact CC's income. I could be wrong, but if I'm right, then the decision could be made with little consequences.

If CC admin sees that people feel strong about this, they may change it. However, seeing how many votes there are, and the spread, perhaps most of the people on the site don't feel very strongly about it.

exactly georgey boy!

i was going to say the same thing you just did.

It's on the front freaking page.

When you make an account you check the little box that says 'I won't do this!'.

If you DO 'do this'... no second chance. Period.

It's terms of service, plain and simple.

never was my answer, a strict one rule would be runner up (1 being the player has to go back to their original account)...

i hope to see this changed some day

The mods should at least regularly update a list of all multi-offenders/buybackers, so it would be easy for the most concerned of us to avoid this whole issue all together. However, that leaves the less-forum-aware players at the mercy of immoral buybackers... r

BigBallinStalin wrote:The mods should at least regularly update a list of all multi-offenders/buybackers, so it would be easy for the most concerned of us to avoid this whole issue all together. However, that leaves the less-forum-aware players at the mercy of immoral buybackers... r

How about buy back multis have their names in a different color to alert us non multi cheaters to who they are? PINK would be cute. YELLOW may be better.

More money for lack -- it won't change.

created the poll so i could see a rough estimate of how many multis we have running around here... cause those are the only people that would vote for allowing multiple buy backs...

it appears we have quite a few...

or maybe one guy voting many times

In the words of the great poet and actor Curtis Jackson:

Yeah yeah, get more money, more money

They're going to stop allowing money back soon as they're going to dislike getting money.

KraphtOne wrote:created the poll so i could see a rough estimate of how many multis we have running around here... cause those are the only people that would vote for allowing multiple buy backs...

it appears we have quite a few...

I was thinking the exact same thing

jefjef wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:The mods should at least regularly update a list of all multi-offenders/buybackers, so it would be easy for the most concerned of us to avoid this whole issue all together. However, that leaves the less-forum-aware players at the mercy of immoral buybackers... r

How about buy back multis have their names in a different color to alert us non multi cheaters to who they are? PINK would be cute. YELLOW may be better.

Then to avoid the persecution of having the unwanted color, they will play on their new multi account.

Georgerx7di wrote:

jefjef wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:The mods should at least regularly update a list of all multi-offenders/buybackers, so it would be easy for the most concerned of us to avoid this whole issue all together. However, that leaves the less-forum-aware players at the mercy of immoral buybackers... r

How about buy back multis have their names in a different color to alert us non multi cheaters to who they are? PINK would be cute. YELLOW may be better.

Then to avoid the persecution of having the unwanted color, they will play on their new multi account.

Ah, full circle...

BigBallinStalin wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:

jefjef wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:The mods should at least regularly update a list of all multi-offenders/buybackers, so it would be easy for the most concerned of us to avoid this whole issue all together. However, that leaves the less-forum-aware players at the mercy of immoral buybackers... r

How about buy back multis have their names in a different color to alert us non multi cheaters to who they are? PINK would be cute. YELLOW may be better.

Then to avoid the persecution of having the unwanted color, they will play on their new multi account.

Ah, full circle...

and ANOTHER 25$ for CC... it's a win win.

jefjef wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:

jefjef wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:The mods should at least regularly update a list of all multi-offenders/buybackers, so it would be easy for the most concerned of us to avoid this whole issue all together. However, that leaves the less-forum-aware players at the mercy of immoral buybackers... r

How about buy back multis have their names in a different color to alert us non multi cheaters to who they are? PINK would be cute. YELLOW may be better.

Then to avoid the persecution of having the unwanted color, they will play on their new multi account.

Ah, full circle...

and ANOTHER 25$ for CC... it's a win win.

But of course.

Georgerx7di wrote:

72o wrote:I am totally in agreement with your viewpoint on this issue, but,

This poll seems kind of pointless to me. This is like starting a poll,
"How much should premium cost?"
"How many hours a day should Lack spend programming updates for the site?"
"Should the mods be paid for their services?"

I kind of disagree 72. This is something that admin could change without loosing much. I can't imagine that there are that many multi's buying back. So I don't think that the loss of that income would be something would significantly impact CC's income. I could be wrong, but if I'm right, then the decision could be made with little consequences.

If CC admin sees that people feel strong about this, they may change it. However, seeing how many votes there are, and the spread, perhaps most of the people on the site don't feel very strongly about it.

But really...even if people feel strongly, what will they do? How many people feel strongly unhappy enough to not re/purchase their premium account? More than the number of multi-buybacks? I doubt it. So in the end, it's a business decision.

Foxglove wrote:But really...even if people feel strongly, what will they do? How many people feel strongly unhappy enough to not re/purchase their premium account? More than the number of multi-buybacks? I doubt it. So in the end, it's a business decision.

This was my point exactly. Regardless of the poll outcome, nothing will change unless it makes dollars and sense for those who stand to benefit financially from this site. The only option you have is to vote with your wallet, as foxglove says above.

Otherwise, it's an exercise in futility, like a US poll asking, "Should Congress repeal their automatic pay increases?" Of course the poll is going to be overwhelmingly yes, but do you think Congress would propose such a bill and vote it into law? Not unless the threat of being removed from office by their constituents' votes was very serious.

hey! you have 10 or 20 members that you think very powerfull because everyday in the forum!!!!!

you think powerfull!!!!!
you are 0,001% on the conquer club

plz d ont speak for us 95% on conquer club

ETROPAL wrote:hey! you have 10 or 20 members that you think very powerfull because everyday in the forum!!!!!

you think powerfull!!!!!
you are 0,001% on the conquer club

plz d ont speak for us 95% on conquer club

95% aren't multi cheaters are they? I hope not.

nah etropal is just saying that as all of his multi accounts make up for 95% of the cc population

jammyjames wrote:nah etropal is just saying that as all of his multi accounts make up for 95% of the cc population

I said this is the same 20......

please speak in correct english, i dont not understand

I think it is ok if they buy back in, usually it is before their year of premium is up so they contribute more money to the site. eventually they will have to stop making multi's and buying back due to financial loss. I say let them keep wasting their money on the site as long as they want:) only helps CC